NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Kingship crucial to political workings of all kingdoms? dynastic ism very important as were strong kinship tires in binding together monarchies? also problematic? Charlemagne forbade sons to kill, blind, mutilate nephews, of force them to be tonsured Kings and aristocrats marriage alliances? conduits property, power, peace weavers, foci of interest groups, kin by marriage could offer political support, maternal and paternal kin could transmit claims on wealth and prestige to the next generation. Dead as well as living royal women acted as a focus for the loyalties of a subset of Carolingian kin and enabled one group to define itself against others?
women? s identity Charlemagne choose Hildegrad in rent east of Rhine due to her Alemannic lineage? legitimized Charlemagne? s rule here, significant channels of patronage, second marriage and kin v. kin caused civil war in case of Louis the Pious Carolingians choose aristocrats as wives? queens ran households, dispensed annual payments?
a king? s wife? s kin were his own? in laws offered support. ? Carolingians rarely allowed daughters to marry? kept in convents, widen too much the circle of kinship. ?
Carolingians faced with no greater threat than the sterility of their wives? too much on binding-power of marriage alliances? who could predict? women? s infertility or her arousing irrevocable odium. Kingship scare resource and sub-kingdoms limited?
King? s sons surplus to requirements had to be shed? few kings escaped problem of rebellion by close kinsmen? only after Carloman, Charlemagne? s son was blinded did aristocratic support diminish. Names to include and exclude in Carolingians?
Bernard name with illegitimacy, unlike Pippin? Charlemagne calls sons Clovis and Chlothar? neither illegitimacy or canonical disqualification proved definitive bars to royal succession? 887? 870 Charles the Bald? s long tonsured son found support. Potent's? powerful one at court?
due to closeness to the ruler? ploughed benefits back into roots of their social power? King? s job to make sure such men did not focus of faction or rebellion? kingdom hold together if aristocrats functioned and saw themselves as givers of counsel? Konigsnahe.
Young nobility around court for Konigsnahe, military political and social skills, queen surrogate mother and gift giver, same with clerics. King had access to lower social levels? important for support but such people, with royal protection had power? but maintenance relationship with Lords aristocracy as important if not more so than with kin. ? Kingship and lordship went together and reinforced each other, main danger to a king was noble conspiracy.
Free research essays on topics related to: women , kin, charlemagne, charlemagne , king
Research essay sample on Charlemagne King
