Example research essay topic: Dred Scott Decision Northern And Southern - 617 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

1) The relationship between the nature of northern and southern society, and the fundamental causes of the Civil War were labor. Labor was the most disputed topic for over 50 years, in particular the type of labor to be used, slave or peasant. For years politicians battled using every excuse and major institution they could to prove their side correct. From science, and religion to politics and life. It is rather obvious that both of the authors (Beard s and Schlesinger) were influenced in very different manners. The Beard s take the stand that the north is forming a revolution similar to that of the French, attempting to overthrow the southern aristocracy as the peasants fought to overthrow their French aristocracy.

They place northern industrialists as the evil of the nation, stating, capitalists, laborers, and farmers of the North and West drove from power in the national government the planting aristocracy of the South The Beard s apparently are referring to some of the limitations put on their slave laws such as the Wilmot Proviso, which forced the south to stop expanding their slave empires, and the rejection by Congress of the Lecompton constitution. Alternatively, Schlesinger takes an outside perspective finding it inevitable that there was going to be a moral choice, siding with the north in calling slavery an act of aggression forcing that choice. It can be argued on Schlesinger s side that the south forced war upon themselves with actions such as the Dred Scott decision, which allowed slave owners to move their slaves anywhere they pleased whether it was a free or a salve state, and the attempt in passing the Lecompton constitution. Although both authors find the relationship between the nature of northern and southern society was labor, each feels that the fundamental causes of war, while based on labor, were for totally different reasons.

Beard supported slavery, and Schlesinger opposed it. 2) Beard and Schlesinger take opposing sides when it comes to the fundamental causes of the Civil War, . They also would more then likely be on opposing sides when it came to the rise of the Republican Party, conflict over slavery in the territories, and the causes to southern secession. Assuming that to be true Schlesinger more than likely would have favored the rise of the Republican Party as they were mostly northerners against slavery praising them in the fight against the democratic southerners. With favoritism towards the north he definitely would interpret the conflict in the territories as the south s fault just as it would have been in the Dred Scott decision. With Respect to secession Schlesinger would interpret it as the south being immature in their actions and decisions finding secession unnecessary and as a way to stamp their feet like little kids. Beard would find the south righteous in their actions against the overpowering monarchy of the north.

Interpreting the rise of the Republican Party as a front for the beginning of a new England (with respect to form of government only). All the while proclaiming the south the victor and the underdog of the instigating north during conflict over slavery in the territories and secession. The most irrational interpretation of all would be the proper action taken with respect to secession from the union. Finding it a necessary tore-gain their god given power to do as they wish for labor forces.

We now see the sectional division is not only between politicians but historians as well, some of it might have had to do with time period of the authors, as Schlesinger was thirty years latter than Beard, by that time the whole outlook towards that period had changed, thus the distinction between them.

Research essay sample on Dred Scott Decision Northern And Southern