NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
In the Shakespearean play Hamlet, the character of Hamlet goes through a great ordeal. His father has been killed and to make matters worse it was by the hands of his uncle Claudius. On top of all this his mother, marries his uncle Claudius for unknown reasons. It is hard to imagine how one would deal with such a catastrophe. Hamlet however does so in a very unique fashion, instead of mourning his father like most would, he dreams about revenge and it becomes his whole life conquest.
Hate and revenge fully consume him. Hamlet does not act on these feelings right away. He plans to do something but never does. Hamlets actions prove him to be very idealistic and non-impulsive by nature.
At the beginning of the play when Hamlet finds out about his fathers murder, he is angered and wants to take immediate action. Hamlet however seems to be all talk and no action. He goes through this big speech on revenge and how sweet it will be. O cursed spite, That ever I was born to set it right" (Act I, sc iv, ll, 184 - 185). He does not take action until he is perfectly sure of the crime and when his own life is in danger.
This shows Hamlets non impulsiveness or cowardliness to the situation. He probably was not a coward because he obviously does not care about his life which he mentions throughout the play, he was just waiting for the right plan and the right time. Throughout the play Hamlet has many chances to kill Claudius but does not. He makes the excuses as to why he should not. This happens when Claudius is praying. Hamlet assumes that he is praying for forgiveness when in fact Claudius really is trying to but can not Now might I do it pat, now he is praying; and now Ill dot.
and so he goes to heaven; (Act II, sc iii, ll, 67 - 68). If Hamlet had stuck around to see what Claudius was realy doing he could have killed him right then and there. Hamlet decides that killing him after he repents is not true revenge. Instead he will wait until he can catch Claudius in a sinful act and then take his life while his soul is tainted. This shows Hamlets non-impulsiveness. Another reason that Hamlet might not have killed him right away is because it would be boring.
Hamlet is far too complex of a character to just stab a foe in the back. In other words Hamlet may have said he would kill Claudius right then and there but he would definitely prefer a shameful, sin revealing death for Claudius. If Hamlet had stabbed him in the back he would have no real proof of what happened except for Claudius reaction to the players Give me some light Away! (Act III, sc ii, l, 256). Instead he would have two deaths by his hand with no explanation that anyone would believe except for Horatio, because of Hamlets false madness which he uses hide his true intentions of revenge.
Hamlet is very idealistic as proved previously. He is definitely not impulsive. If anything he tends procrastinates. He seems to be all talk and the only reason he got his vengeance was because it was handed to him by fate and circumstance. If he did not take the chance during the duel he would have obtained his vengeance. However if he had acted sooner his mother and Laertes and Polonius would not have been killed, and Ophelia would also not have killed herself.
Free research essays on topics related to: hamlets, uncle claudius, kill claudius, play hamlet, praying
Research essay sample on Uncle Claudius Kill Claudius
