NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... antics need to have it constantly beaten into them for some reason. In regard to # 5, the first sentence is blatantly false (the composers of the oldies song "Ebony and Ivory" ought to be ashamed to put that sentence into their lyrics), and anyone could bet all their money against it and easily win. And in regard to the second sentence, sure all individuals are unique (i. e. no two fingerprints and EEG brain waves are exactly alike) but that doesn't mean that patterns don't exist among groups of people, nationalities, or genders.
Now, though there are various degrees of PC fanaticism, some PC fanatics only use the "you can't generalize or stereotype" accusation when someone identifies a pattern they don't agree with or like, but don't use it when they themselves agree with the described pattern. In a way, this is a double standard, for this type of semi-PC fanatic will demand scientific proof from the one they disagree with, but when they agree with the pattern, then they don't need proof for it, and in fact base it on nothing but their own observations as well. PC fanatics should take note of the following. At the very least, as the enlightened have said, "Every stereotype is based on some grain of truth." Suggested criteria in resolving disagreements In such cases as the above, those who disagree on their experiences and the patterns they observed ought to compare their qualifications - namely, a) the vastness of their experiences, b) how well-traveled they are, and c) the number of people they " ve known or met, in relation to the subject at hand.
Those with higher qualifications in these areas ought to be considered more credible, and ought to be able to back it up as well. For example, as it applies to a and b, someone who's been to a hundred countries (such exist by the way, for I have met them) is far more qualified to make culture comparisons, observing and identifying patterns between them, than someone who has never left their own city, state / province , or country. And likewise, someone who has lived in a foreign country for at least a year, immersing themselves with its culture and people while living amongst them, is far more qualified to be stating patterns than the typical American who only knows about that country from their media. Now in regards to c, when you know or have met many people who are well traveled, you will notice that patterns exist among their stories and experiences. For example, as a traveler myself who has met many others, here are some common consensuses I've noticed. Most Americans who have been to Spain, Italy, Greece or similar countries have reported that people there are far more festive, lively, and open than in the US.
Most Europeans I know who have been to the US usually cite their dislike of how fake and cliches the way people smile and greet each other there. Therefore, if you cite a pattern yourself that other well qualified people have agreed with, it gives the pattern even stronger credibility, which you can argue. And even if you find a minority of qualified people who disagree with that observation, you can logically overrule them based on the numbers, but to be fair, you should nevertheless take note of the minority opinion into consideration (e. g. 8 out of 10 people I know find Spain more lively and festive than the US; 7 out of 10 Spaniards I've met dislike American culture and their fake smiles and cliches greetings). PC fanatics' denial of the science of genetics Another feature of PC fanatics is that they seem to deny the existence of genetics altogether, dismissing and ignoring an entire branch of science. They have this fanatical belief that everyone's personality, behavior, characteristics, mindset, and beliefs are COMPLETELY determined by their environment, culture, and how they were raised.
In simple terms, in the nature vs. nurture debate, they completely side with nurture. They have little or no evidence or sound reasoning to base this on, yet believe it fervently, even ignoring all contrary evidence. This belief is especially prevalent in America, where the values of individual liberty, freedom, and "taking control of your destiny" dominate popular thought and culture. But around the world, it varies though, for in some countries (e. g.
Asia and Africa) people lean more toward predetermined destiny and fate, with less of a belief in the individual's power to control his / her fate or destiny. You can see in this graph here what people in different nations believe about fate: web The truth though, is that most of the research by science in the field of genetics and heredity have concluded that our personalities are determined about 50 / 50 by nature and nurture. The evidence, tested, observed, and researched for many years, indicate this. Yet most Americans and PC fanatics believe that personality is 100 percent nurture and 0 percent nature.
Perhaps they have a need to believe that they are in control, and despise the notion of being a slave or prisoner to their genes. The research which proves the PC fanatics wrong, is well documented. Most of it indicates that its about 50 / 50. See the following: web nurture. htm web web web 10 - 20. html web nurture.
htm web It is clear that there is a genetic or inherited element involved in our personalities, temperament, and in what makes us "tick." For example, two siblings can grow up in the same families and environment, yet turn out to be totally different in personality and beliefs. Also, studies have shown that fraternal twins who were reared apart tend to still have striking similarities in personality, habits, choices, etc. some of which are very eerie. That strongly favors nature over nurture, for example. And, some are born with phobias that have no environmental learned cause. For instance, I've always had a fear of heights, and as a little child was even afraid to go down slides in the playground.
Yet I had no bad experiences or trauma that caused this. I was born like that. And some are born with natural talents as well, that aren't learned (e. g.
Mozart could play the piano as a child without ever having been taught it). Another consensus among behavioral scientists and specialists is that behavior and habits are mostly learned and therefore changeable. That is the good news, which is that undesirable behavior, bad habits or cyclical addictions, can in fact, be changed by behavioral modification techniques. However, our basic core personality, who we are, and what makes us tick, cannot be changed, only enhanced to varying degrees.
Though we or others may try to change who we are, we simply end up coming back to being the same as before. There is a saying that "people never change" and it does have some basis in truth, but those who utter it ought to understand that behavior and habits can be changed. Perhaps this person who goes by "list" on Planet Papers. com, summarized the relation between genetics and environment best: web "The most fundamental way to rationalize my opinion is quite comprehensible. It is that heredity determines ones potential, but environment devises how far one will reach that potential. Nature designs blueprints and nurture modifies them each step of the way (Dempsey and Zimbardo 164). (For instance), some genes increase our risk of heart disease: but if we know this and eat less fat, we reduce the risk (Tue). " As it's not always easy to recognize the difference between what is changeable and what isn't, perhaps the following serenity prayer applies: God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, Courage to change the things I can, And wisdom to know the difference
Free research essays on topics related to: pattern, fanatics, patterns, nurture, e g
Research essay sample on Web Nurture Htm Nurture Htm Web People
