NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... Censorship is not taking away the rights of citizens, it is protecting the rights of people who do not wish to be exposed to certain things. It is also a great tool in preserving morals and social order. Violence in things such as movies and pornography obviously encourage criminal, or immoral behavior. Restricting such materials to certain times and places may keep them being viewed as taboo, and not allow them to become the norms of society. When these grounds are considered, we can see that censorship is a beneficial tool and must be applied in order to keep society at a safe, respectable, and just level.
Con Censorship To look at the other side of this subject, the question to be asked is censorship in libraries and schools is justified. The answer is no, and that is what will be explained. Censorship is ridiculous, unfair and selfish, and censors are hypocritical, intolerant, and arrogant. What I mean when I say censorship is ridiculous is exactly that.
In censorship opposing Viewpoints, it states that the American Heritage Dictionary was banned from Anchorage, Alaska because of words considered to be obscene, like bed, tail, ball, and nut. At first we laugh at it, but we stop when we hear it has also been banned in Cedar City, Indiana, and Eldon, Missouri. The percent of other dictionaries were banned in Texas. These people that ban them call themselves People for Better Education. I thought dictionaries help you learn? An article in Scholastic Update entitled The Case of the disappearing Books it says last year there were 338 cases of parents trying to remove books, among these was the classic Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain.
A teacher was fired because she assigned a book with a lesbian as a main character. A parent, Ruth Somoro, said this was being intolerant of religious beliefs, and schools arent supposed to promote religious beliefs. The Supreme Court ruled books couldnt be removed because they dislike the ideas in them. A student says, They dont let me bring God into school, so I dont think they should be able to bring the devil into school. This boy thought homosexuals descended directly from the devil. Religious Right people seem to think that if you have a word in your vocabulary such as, academic freedom, analysis, career education, creative writing, human growth, identity, parenting, racism, world view, and self-understanding, (there are others but this gets all of the human race), you are a secular humanist.
This has now become known as anyone with other beliefs than the Religious Right; it is a code word for communism. These people are part of a conspiracy against America and dare also communists who shouldnt have a say in anything. This is from an essay in Censorship opposing viewpoint, by Michael Scott Cane. The second aspect that censorship is unfair and selfish deals with our rights and the First Amendment. A quote from Nat Hent off in The Case of the disappearing books, says, The First Amendment doesnt just give you the right to express ideas, theres also a right to receive them. We have the right to read any book we want and educate ourselves: the library plays a big part in this.
Guess what, we also have the right to choice and we can choose not to read something if we dont like the content, that doesnt mean we have to force others not to read it. The Religious Right seems to be forcing their beliefs on us, and we also have freedom of Religion. The Religious Right is trying to take over the libraries locally. The libraries would then be family friendly with parental advisory sections because they feel it is Gounaud in an article from the education Digest, The Religious Right Hits Libraries. The Religious Right doesnt agree with ALAs Bill of Rights, which is totally anti censorship.
I think these people must be protecting themselves from the outside world, not watching news or reading newspapers to see what really happens and the horrors people have to go through every day, we learn about them sometime. I feel bad for their kids. The last point is ever so true. Censors are the most arrogant, hypocritical, intolerant people ever. In Censorship Opposing Viewpoints the essay by Michael Scott Cane also says, Secular humanism causes falling test scores, declining values, lack of Christian morals, poor grammar, situational ethics, and other things they disapprove of.
It is destroying the family, wrecking society, and wiping out the minds of children. I dont see this happening. They also said how much better everything was when in Public School they taught praying and the bible, back in the old day. I dont think so. A problem is that there is no compromise; there are no neutral parties. In The Religious Right Hits Libraries Karen Jo Gounaud says there is too much material that undermines traditional values and traditional family.
The term traditional is problems. They cannot solve all problems by forcing beliefs on you. They think if you do not have their beliefs you will corrupt society? The Religious Right also says the Liberal Left censors and undermines education, how hypocritical is that? The Religious Right also says the Liberal Left censors and undermines education.
Who is to say whose moral beliefs are correct? With censorship you are saying with absolute certainty that your, and not being tolerant of others. Conclusion Many believe censorship keeps the U. S. from being corrupted, other say that it takes away from our rights as an American. Without censorship we are exposing our youth to criminals favorite viewing and hobbies.
The youth will become more corrupted thus giving in to more criminal activities. If you do not support censorship then you are supportive in the act of making our youth into criminals. If we do not expose our youth to the evils in the world then how do they know right from wrong when they run into it? If we do not show them what effects drugs, sex, and violence can have on them then they will not know what is the harm in those things. If we show a kid, on TV a person that got shot and the sadness it brings to that persons family or other love ones then they will be more likely feel sadden themselves, or at least angered by the gunman. Censorship has many pros and cons to it, many people disagree with it, and many support it.
The debate on censorship will go on forever without ever being resolved. In this day of age censorship is more of a choice with programs on TV, Internet, and even Video Games that allow to block ones son or daughter from viewing. Censorship is a controversial word that has been with us far back as we can remember.
Free research essays on topics related to: libraries, opposing viewpoints, first amendment, religious beliefs, censorship
Research essay sample on Opposing Viewpoints Religious Beliefs
