NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Our country was founded on the belief that it is every mans right to express his beliefs. Who are we to decide if another persons ideas are out of line. We can not now give in and let our government tell us what we can and can not think. Fuck the Draft these simple, and to some, offensive words landed a man, Paul Robert Cohen in jail after walking down the corridor of the Los Angeles Courthouse. In 1971 this man was arrested under the penal code 415 for malicious and willful disturbance of the peace. Is you today.
Would you find a man, who had done nothing to offend anyone in the court house, by his actions or speech, guilty? I challenge you to consider this as you listen to the events that took place February 22, 1971. Paul Robert Cohen s constitutional rights to freedom of speech were violated. The first amendment states, Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, of the press; or the right of people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This means that Paul Robert Cohen is fully protected from judgment and interference from the government by the constitution. First of all, we should look to see if what he did was truly disturbing the peace.
Since he was not being vocal about his opinions and instead had only written them on his jacket it is easy for offended people to just look away from the words. This means that Cohen is sending his message only to those willing to read it. Though his words are harsh, some may agree that these words are needed to send out his extreme feelings toward the draft during the Vietnam War. The word Fuck may be distasteful to some people but it is said that one mans vulgarity is another mans lyric. Secondly, the public is allowed to express itself.
As Mr. Justice Frankfurter was quoted saying, One of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures and that means not only informed and responsible criticism, but the freedom to speak foolishly and without moderation. (end quote) Because it is impossible for government officials to make distinctions in the area of proper word use, the Constitution gives the individual the power to distinguish what is in good taste. Maybe it is true that Paul Robert Cohen s words and median were chosen poorly, but has the right to express himself in anyway that he feels is appropriate as long as it is not violent. This leads us to the fact that, if the government has the ability to ban certain words, it runs the risk of suppressing ideas. If given this ability, the government may censor certain words to ban the expression of unpopular views. We have to allow views that we don t agree with to be said as well as the ones that we do agree with.
We must accept the benefits and consequences of this freedom. There seems to be very little social benefit when comparing the risk of censorship and the suppression of ideas and beliefs. It is obvious that Cohen stood as no real threat to the peace. He meant for the words written on his jacket to inform others around him how he felt about the draft, andthe Vietnam War. He did not threaten anyone, nor did anyone threaten him because ohio jacket. He made no disturbances or loud noises prior to his arrest.
An arrest that was based on the idea that he had a tendency to provoke others to acts of violence or to injury disturb the peace. As we have seen, Paul Robert Cohen was arrested under the unconstitutional circumstances. His rights to freedom of speech were violated. He was in no way disturbing the peace. And though he might have been foolish to choose the words he did, he has that right and should not be suppressed. I believe J.
Brandeis sums this all up when he said, The constitutional right of free expression is a powerful medicine in a society as diverse and populous as ours. It is designed and intended to remove governmental restraints from the arena of public discussion, putting the decision as that views shall be voiced largely into the hands of each of us, in the hope that use of such freedom will ultimately produce a more capable citizenry and more perfect polity and in the belief that no other approach would comport with the premise of individual dignity and choice upon which our political system rests. (end quote) This means that are allowed to speak as we wish, without fear of oppression. This allows freethought, without which we would not be where we are today.
Free research essays on topics related to: cohen, draft, freedom of speech, jacket, vietnam war
Research essay sample on Freedom Of Speech Vietnam War
