NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Summary: My God, its full of cliches! (with apologies to the writers of 2010) A good cast, some impressive special effects, and an experienced astronaut providing technical advice. What could have gone wrong? Lets start with the script. It combines every possible sci-fi cliche (look for these movies as they appear in M 2 M: 2001 and 2010 in a big way, Dune, The Abyss, Apollo 13, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, to name only a few) in a melodramatic, hokey script. Granted, theres a really good cast hiding in this movie somewhere, but with the script theyre given, they didnt stand a chance. If, by some chance, you can overcome the dialogue and the contrived, overdone attempts at drama and suspense, youre still faced with the background music.
Constantly. It never stops. It would be one thing if it were a traditional John Williams score, but this sounds like it was composed when someone threw their cat on the keyboard and let it run free. Remember the score to the original Terminator? Mozart compared to this. The upside: the special effects were not too bad.
The technology (ships, Mars hab) portrayed was impressive. I saw the movie with a sneak preview audience of a lot of NASA and aerospace people, and everyone agreed. The shots of the Mars landscape and some of the storms (you see them in the previews) are pretty cool, but nothing we havent seen before. On the other hand, I wont go into the CGI aliens that would be too much of a spoiler but lets just say that Marvin the Martian would have done just as well. Oh, and I didnt realize that Mars would look so much like Utah But all in all, eye candy is only eye candy. Mission to Mars tried to be many things on many levels action / adventure , quasi-romance, hard sci-find failed at all of them.
Save your $ 8 and go rent 2001 instead. Gary Since, what were you thinking? Mission To Mars boasts a very impressive visual style. Brian De Palma takes his camera and turns it all around in space and gives you the feeling that youre actually floating around in a Mars bound spaceship. Mars hasnt looked this good since Total Recall and the sandstorms that occur on Mars are quite spectacular.
There are two scenes that really work. The first deals with the first Mars expedition and the ensuing calamity that causes a second mission to the angry red planet. The second good scene is one in which the rescue team has to abandon their ship and try to make it to an orbiting supply vessel. Those scenes, however, are book ended by scenes that go on too long.
These scenes are filled with dialogue that goes nowhere. The point is made in the first few lines, but the writers deemed it necessary to have the actors spout it out at every given second. With a cast like Gary Since, Tim Robbins, and Don Cheadle, youd think youd have it covered. To their credit, they give it all theyve got, and they do manage to have some fine moments.
Too bad they were hampered with lines that didnt move the story forward. Brian De Palmas mastery of the visual medium makes for some interesting visuals and he of course borrows things from 2001, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and Star Wars. Mission To Mars has some interesting ideas, but ultimately, the climax left me feeling cheated. I wanted more.
Mars is an alien planet that holds many mysteries. From that thought you can cook up any number of scenarios that are fought with danger. Overall, two really good scenes, some good visual effects and a great production design are hampered by many bad scenes supplied by a weak script that gives good actors some really bad lines. Summary: Solid sci-fi with Hitchcocki an cinematic feel As a long-time aficionado of hard science fiction, both in print and on film, I am mystified at the intensity of negative reviews that have accreted around MISSION TO MARS.
Consider the typical criticisms that hard-core fans level at screen sci-fi: 1. Its all special effects, and the plot is not character driven. ' Well, this film is all about characters and their very human emotions: wonder, love, loss, frustration, gratitude. If this movie had been any more character-driven, it would have been a Bergman flick. 2. The writers obviously dont understand science or simply cheat on the scientific angle to squeeze the budget or get around plotting difficulties. Again, it seems to me that the producers spared no expense to give good, rock-hard science here. The shots in the Mars-bound spaceship were incredible.
One-upping both Stanley Kubrick on centrifuge shots, and APOLLO 13 on free-fall shots, de Palma incorporated both reference frames seamlessly. Its a brilliant piece of cinematography, directing, and editing. 3. Theres nothing new here. This was all covered by Heinlein/Asimov/Clarke/Dick by the end of the 1950 s. Well, Ive got news for you: all literary plots and themes have been covered at some point in the past. Even Shakespeare borrowed shamelessly from earlier works.
Actually, theres plenty thats new in MISSION TO MARS. The Hitchcock method of continuous panning so beloved by Brian de Palma is used to great effect heretic first sci-fi film to be so shot. For comparision, take a peek at de Palmas previous effort, SNAKE EYES, to see the same technique. Although I consider MISSION TO MARS to be a top-notch science fiction film, beautiful to look at and listen to, I certainly cant give it a perfect 10.
While the physical science is good, the biology is substandard. The ending is relatively weak, but I cant judge the whole book by its last chapter. I give it a solid 8, and I recommend it for theatrical viewing.
Free research essays on topics related to: third kind, science fiction, sci fi, special effects, close encounters
Research essay sample on Sci Fi Close Encounters
