NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
The safety of both parties involved must be taken into consideration in the process. The first thing that must be examined is the safety of society. The refugee determination process which exists in Canada prevents migrants with a past criminal history from being granted refugee status. Many believe however that the determination process is inadequate as it is backlogged with thousand of refugee claims meaning that a possibly dangerous migrant awaiting a determination hearing would be allowed to reside in Canada until that time.
Also existing with the determination process in an Undocumented Convention Class which allows refugees whose identity documents are unable to be obtained to do civil war in their country to be admitted into Canada. Without these identity document there would be no way to back check for previous criminal behavior. But of course the safety of refugee is an issue which is not overlooked. Why else would there be a need for migrants to seeks refugee or asylum in another country. A person in need of protection is a foreign national in Canada whose removal to their country or countries of nationality or, if they do not have a country of nationality, their country of former habitual residence, would subject them personally to a danger, believed on substantial grounds to exist, or of torture within the meaning of the Convention Against Torture. With keeping the safety of both society and claimant in mind a compromise was struck in the passing of Bill C- 31 on April 6, 2000.
This bill brought forth significant changes as it now takes the place of the immigration act. In addressing the safety concern involved in the determination process one of the bills main goals as stated in s section (J) of the bill summary was to enforce the ineligibility of foreign nationals who are criminals, security threats, and repeat claimants to the refugee protection process of the Immigration and Refugee Board. This will ensure that bogus claimants are both not granted refugee status and not eligible to continuously file claims with the intention of prolonging their stay in Canada. During the Kosovar war more than 5000 refugees were accepted into Canada. Of these 5000 refugees 800 elected to remain in Canada after the war had ended.
Over the next two years the government will pay all their expenses as they attempt to get settled 1. This exemplifies the economical issue surrounding the admittance process. ? In 1997 Canada accepted over 7, 700 government sponsored and 2, 600 privately-sponsored refugees. ? When a refugee is sponsored whether it be government or privately, the sponsor is responsible for providing cost of living expenses to the refugee until they are settled or up to two years time. These are not the only costs that must be covered by tax payers. When a ship is found to be attempting to smuggle people into the country, the migrants aboard the ship are detained.
While detained the migrants will attempt to claim for refugee status and remain in detention while their past history is investigated and they await their refugee determination hearing. ? Canadian taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for the investigations or care of people who have been detained at the border by immigration officials attempting to enter the country undocumented. ? However, a Vancouver immigration lawyer says it best when he says that allowing these people who have tried to illegally enter the country the opportunity to claim refugee status is just part of Canada? s immigration and refugee process, and it has to be followed. It?
s always nice to hear that our hands are tied. There is of course another side to the economic argument which is that it is in Canada? s economic best interest to continue to accept more migrants seeking refuge. So in the economic debate we have two conflicting sides which in turn creates a dilemma. The side arguing that Canada does not have a moral obligation to admit refugee states that it is an economic burden to tax payers to have to divvy up cost of living and cost of investigation expenses. Those favoring the humanitarian policy of Canada states that economically the individuals admitted will actually benefit Canada economically.
The debate has once again been settled to some extent and a compromise has been formed in the passing of Bill C- 31. The bill brings with it improvements to the refugee determination process and by not allowing repeat claimants to continuously file the system will move quicker and those of whom are not granted refugee status will be sent back to their country and will no longer be a responsibility to tax payers. 336
Free research essays on topics related to: bill c, cost of living, tax payers, canada , refugee
Research essay sample on Cost Of Living Tax Payers
