NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Marxism and Fascism Even though that the promoters of left wing-agenda try to assure us that the rise of Marxism in 20 th century was absolutely natural, because it corresponded to people's inner drives towards equality and fairness, in this essay we will prove that the only reason why utterly degenerate social ideas became popular among great many people, is because people themselves had biologically degraded, through continuous process of racial mixing. It is only the reason why obscure political theory appealed to them. Yet, it is not Europeans, as a whole, that were susceptible to the poison of Marxism in 19 th - 20 th centuries, but European intellectual elite. It has to be noted that the spiritual essence of Marxism had never been fully realised even by majority of its adherents, who only thought that it is simply a theory that helps working people. That is why, in European countries, people turned from Marxism to Fascism within very short period of time, once they realised that the promoters of international brotherhood of workers only using them for pursuing their own secular agenda. Trotsky used to openly refer to proletarians as the firewood in the chimney of international revolution.
In 1848 Karl Marx and Frederic Engel published a so-called Communist Manifesto, which stated that all people in the world are divided on bourgeoisie and proletariat, which are the biggest enemies and there can be no reconciliation reached between them. They predicted that historically, the bourgeoisie is doomed to physical annihilation, to prevent it from exploiting proletariat any further. Marx and Engel suggested that there is no other purpose of ones existence, but materialistic one. If person isnt hungry all his needs are satisfied. Nevertheless, it is only in semi-feudal Russia, where Marxists were able to take over the political power, even though that in theory, the Communist revolutions were supposed to occur in highly industrialized countries. The attempts of Communists to overthrow governments in European countries, before the begining of the Second World War, had failed, because the majority of people were strongly against it.
Let us not forget that Russians have endured 300 years of Mongol occupation, which resulted in fact that even now, many Russians' anthropological features are of clearly Mongoloid nature. This explains the fact why Russians had never revolted against the political tyranny, which was the form of their government throughout the history. Also, the majority of Russians were much more devout Christians than their Western counterparts. The Communist theory appealed to their inner subconscious drives, as it is basically nothing but a Christian doctrine, designed for the twentieth century. Right after they took over the power in 1917, Communists began to destroy Christian churches, as they rightfully considered the Christianity to be the poison for masses.
Yet, as it turned out, people remained absolutely indifferent, while within their churches being blown to the sky. After the end of Communism in Russia, people started to indulge in religious superstitions again, as if nothing happened. This shows that the real reason why Marxism was able to prevail in Russia is because of Russians' biological and spiritual corruption. Russians never belonged to Western civilization. It was being said about Russians that they occupied on the world's map much more space than they do in history. Marxism's biggest appeal to the Russians was in fact that it points out to the easy way of obtaining riches.
Just as Christianity, that teaches not to be concerned about anything, since a true believer would get everything in the kingdom of heaven, Marxism also promotes the notion that happiness can be obtained very simply, by taking money from rich people and dividing it. The significance of Marxism, as political philosophy, can be compared to the significance of Christianity, as the religion of death and decay, which helped to seal the fate of Roman civilization. Both are based on the denial of scientifically proven fact of natural inequality between men. Also, the practical implications of both doctrines resulted in enormous amount of suffering among people. The Marxism prepared the ground for Communism, which almost succeeded in destroying Western civilization. Today, many progressive historians suggest that Communism, Fascism and the National-Socialism posses essentially the same spiritual properties.
This is the classical case when people look at something at point blank range, yet they still cant see the essence of it. Fascism is essentially a cult of physical health, beauty and intelligence. Many historians refer to the rise of Nazi party as conservative revolution as opposed to liberal revolution with ideas of equality and progress. This only partially is a truth. The twelve years of Nazi rule in Germany is nothing else but an extraordinary attempt to adapt the ideas of ancient Greeks to the realities of modern times. It is no secret that all our concepts of democracy, beauty and progress derive from ancient Greece and Rome.
Hitler just made one step further he applied these ideas to German society, making this nation the happiest on Earth within a few years. So, in broader sense, Hitlers revolution was also based on ideas of progress and equality, but only equality among equal. Today many people are puzzled with the fact that nation of philosophers and composers had so easily adopted the ideals on National-Socialism, they think of it as something incomprehensible. European culture was developing as a succession of the same ideas from ancient times, through Renaissance, to comparatively recent historical past. Thats why Fascism came as very natural worldview for not to just Germans, but to majority of Europeans. As war drew closer to Europe in 1944 - 1945, millions of Europeans were willing to join SS so they could fight advancing barbarians from the east, just like in times when the whole Europe had to unite in order to defend itself from invasions of Huns and Mongols.
Even the most hard-core critics on National-Socialism admit that from the time when Hitler came to power to outbreak of Second World War, Germany from country with staggering inflation rate, with 60 % of unemployment and being deprived of its historical territories, became the most powerful and happy country in Europe. If it wasnt up to the war, Hitler would go down in history as greatest German that ever lived. National-Socialist party deployed a racial approach in its social policies. It has to be said that its only after 1945 that such approach became inappropriate, yet right up to the war, even the U. S. government was successfully using eugenics to improve the quality of its population.
Hitlers party wanted to do the same. In years after the Versailles great many Germans became alcoholics, many of them were being constantly undernourished. This, of course, would heavily impact the next generation of Germans. It has to be remembered that in years 1930 - 1940 Communism was at its strongest, striving for no less than spreading over the whole world. Up to the collapse of Soviet Union its emblem was a hammer and sickle over the globe.
In years, prior to Hitler acquiring political power, Soviet Union used to send marginalized elements to Germany in order to undermine its political stability. They were suppose to spread fire of Communism to Germany as well. There is absolutely nothing in common between Marxism and Fascism, except for the fact that Communist and Fascist countries promoted militarism. It is important for us to understand that the Fascism, in fact, was nothing but a spiritual vaccine against the poison of Marxism. As history shows, the classic European democracies were easily overrun by the communists before and after the World War 2. But it is only the countries where democracy is being reinforced' with the mean of Fascism or National-Socialism that were able to stand up against spiritual plague of Marxism.
National-Socialism produced a deathblow to international Communism. Like a wounded bear, Stalin was able to regain strength and put an end to National-Socialist Germany, yet after this, it was only the matter of time before Communism would collapse. There is no danger that Communism will ever rise again because it failed ideologically, while National-Socialism and Fascism had only failed militarily. The main difference between Marxism and Fascism is conceptual. In Fascist countries people voluntarily surrendered some of their civil freedoms, in oder for their nationhood to be able to survive. Yet, after the initial threats to the sole existence of such countries were being eliminated, they peacefully returned back to the democracy.
We can refer to Chili and Spain as the best examples. The Marxism, on the other hand, is nothing but scientifically designed concept of political tyranny and its only the purpose was to simply turn as many people as possible into the slaves. Bibliography: Communist Manifesto. in Marxism Page. 2001. web (20 Dec, 2005). Marx, Karl. 1995.
Capital. A Critique of Political Economy trans. by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. New York: Random House.
Salisbury, Harrison. 1967. The Soviet Union: The Fifty Years. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. Orwell, George. 1992. 1984. Afterword by Erich Fromm.
New York: Signet,
Free research essays on topics related to: soviet union, communist manifesto, national socialism, second world war, western civilization
Research essay sample on Second World War Communist Manifesto
