NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
When is it Best to Forgive? (1) In public consciousness, Christianity is being closely associated with the spirit of tolerance, because Jesus used to encourage people not to just forgive their enemies but to also take a masochistic pleasure in being repeatedly hit in right and left cheeks, which is explainable, given the fact that Jesus was a mentally deviant person. At the same time, the promotion of ability to forgive, as Christians most cherished virtue, points out at conceptual inconsistency of Christianity. As Jeffrey Murphy had rightly suggested: If one has been genuinely wronged, then a moral wrong has been done; and thus a failure to resent the wrong may be a sign that one acquiesces or is complicituos in immorality hardly a virtuous trait (Murphy, p. 381). Christians fail to understand that, according to the laws of nature, every action draws its consequence; therefore, the forgiveness, when applied to metaphysical wrongness, does not make any sense. The promotion of forgiveness, on the part of Jesus, confirms his Asiatic mentality, because Semitic worldview promotes the notion that every wrong deed, on the part of sinner, can be redeemed, with the mean of financial donation to the Church. If sin can be forgiven, why not institutionalize the process of forgiveness?
Such suggestion, although logical, is absolutely alien to European biological spirituality. Protestantism started as spontaneous reaction of Europeans against Catholic practice of selling indulgences. Therefore, we can only talk about peoples ability to forgive, as being beneficial, if it concerns their closest relatives, because such ability often helps to preserve relationships. As Murphy said: Forgiveness allows the restoration of some of our most valued relationships-relationships that would forever remain fragmented if infected by resentment (Murphy, p. 381). However, if persons willingness to forgive assumes universal properties, it becomes the subject of professional interest for psychiatrists. Forgiveness and resentment, just as love and hate, are the essential components of persons normal existential mode; therefore, it is utterly wrong to associate forgiveness with ultimate good, while referring to resentment as ultimate evil, as homeless bum from Nazarene, who was elevated to the status of God, used to insist upon.
Our genetic makeup defines our behavior, regardless of our religious affiliation Jesus failed to understand this, which comes as no surprise, given the fact that such words as science or culture are simply absent in his lexicon. In order for the notion of forgiveness to have an empirical value, it must be conditional. Jeffrey Murphy is making a very good point when he suggests that: One way to think about the virtue of forgiveness, a way that may avoid condoning servility or complicity in wrongdoing, is to make legitimate forgiveness conditional upon some charge in the wrongdoer for example, repentance (Murphy, p. 381). The history long ago has proved the sheer absurdity of Christianity, which insists that believers ability to love his enemies as thyself constitutes his most important virtue.
This is because such ability cannot correspond to the objective reality in principle. The reason why only a very small number of people take Jesus commandments seriously is that even majority of Christians understand that Christian ethics are counter-productive in their essence. The ability to unconditionally forgive wrongdoers, on the part of every particular individual, cannot be socially beneficial by definition, because only a truly insane person can be proud of his willingness to defy the biological and physical laws of nature. Such willingness always results in death in destruction. The fact is - Bible thumper's are subjected to these laws just as anybody else, even though they prefer not to talk about it. If Christian fanatic jumps off the bridge to defy the laws of gravity, it will not result in him beginning to soar in the sky as eagle, because of the strength of his beliefs, but in his death out of his own stupidity.
Apparently, mentally deficient people are being entitled with the strong instinct of death, which is nothing by natures way of insuring the steady pace of biological evolution. Therefore, those who are willing to forgive their enemies, even before harm is being done to them, should not be looked upon as highly moral people, but as those who belong to a nuthouse. (2) It is only because that we are able to distinguish between good and evil and to take an appropriate action, when faced with their physical manifestations, which enabled scientific and cultural progress in the first place. Jesus true mission was to mix metaphysically opposite notions into monogamous compound, in order to reverse evolutionary process backwards. Therefore his insistence that people must be willing to forgive, regardless of circumstances, should referred to as a proof of Jesus being affected by mental illness, just as his other commandments that encourage people not to wash hands before eating, no to marry, not to bury corpses and not to attend crops, because kingdom of heaven is at hand. Therefore, we can say that Murphy is being very diplomatic, while suggesting that: Christian tradition has perhaps been insufficiently attentive.
Such tradition is not simply being insufficiently attentive, but absolutely counter-productive, in evolutionary sense of this word. Christian vision of forgiveness is nothing but the attempt of metaphysical inferiority to deprive White people of their existential vitality. Christianity strives to make people to loath the classical concepts of physical beauty and intellectual finesse. This is the reason why closer look at Christian numerous saints reveals them as impotent's, retards, sadomasochists and homosexuals. We can only wonder why many people continue to associate Christian concept of forgiveness with wireless, given the fact that Jesus commandments, in regards to forgiveness, encourage people to choose in favor of anti-social mode of behavior. They are suicidal in their essence.
There would not be many people left referring to Jesus as son of God if, for example, he would become resurrected from the dead today and began preaching that people should only cross streets on red light. The fact is, almost every idea contained in good book has nonsensical nature. This is the reason why in Middle Ages, Catholic Church considered attempts to translate Bible from Latin into secular languages as major sin. Persons ability to forgive corresponds to his or her existential nobility.
In its turn, such nobility derives out of persons ability to operate with highly abstract categories, which closely associated with the rate of individuals IQ. Recent discoveries in the field of biology leave no doubt as to the fact that such rate is genetically predetermined. Therefore, physically and mentally healthy individual is automatically able to forgive when necessary, without having the best features of its character being exploited by Jewish prophet of chaos and destruction. Unfortunately, not many people understand this simple fact, which is the reason why preaching good news continues to remain one of the most lucrative commercial enterprises, along with weapons trade and drug trafficking.
In his article, Murphy appears to be a person who understands that the concept of forgiveness has nothing to do with the spirit of Christianity. However, the fact that he is a university professor forces him to remain within the boundaries of political correctness, when he discuses Christianity's ideological inconsistency: Forgiveness here could, it seems, proceed consistently both with self-respect and with respect for the rules of the moral order (Murphy, p. 381). While criticizing Christianity, author does not relate peoples ability to forgive and to resent to particularities of their biological constitution, which is understandable, given the fact that socio-political policies in Western countries currently promote racial mixing as something absolutely natural. This slightly undermines the value of his article.
Nevertheless, we can only agree with Murphy when he endorses natural outlook on the moral dilemmas, which are being traditionally discussed only within the context of Christianity's ideological monopoly. In fifty years from now, Christianity is going to be deprived of the remains of its religious credibility; however, this will not affect peoples ability to forgive and to resent, because, as we have mentioned earlier, it is only our racial and cultural affiliation that define our attitude towards the notions of existential ethics. Abstract: This paper discusses the reasons why the concept of unconditional forgiveness is metaphysically wrong. Outline: Part one Part two
Free research essays on topics related to: counter productive, peoples ability, forgiveness, laws of nature, encourage people
Research essay sample on Laws Of Nature Peoples Ability
