NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Sane vs. Insane To be insane or not to be insane; that is the question. In Act IV Scene II, Hamlet appears to go insane after Polonius s death. There are indications, though, that persuade me to think other wise. Certainly Hamlet has plenty of reasons to be insane at this point.
His day has been hectic; he was finally determined that Claudius had killed his father, the chance to kill Claudius confronted him, he comes very close to convincing Gertrude that Claudius killed his father, he accidentally kills Polonius thinking its Claudius, and his fathers ghost visits him once again. These situations are enough to bring Hamlet to insanity, but he remains sharp and credible. Hamlet is able to make smart remarks to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, comparing them to sponges. When he (Claudius) needs what you have gleaned, it is but squeezing you and, sponge, you shall be dry again, (pg. 98, line 20).
This is random and unexpected, as many of his other actions, but the comparison makes sense. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern soak up all the Kings favors, only to become dry again after they mop up the King s mess, spying on Hamlet and finding Polonius s body. Later, with Claudius, Hamlet tells how modest a king can be by saying, A man (beggar) may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm, (pg. 99, line 29). This also makes sense, and is not quite as random.
When Hamlet confronts Claudius, and the King asks where Polonius is, Hamlet immediately begins the comparison by telling Claudius that Polonius is at supper (the worms are eating him for supper, and so on). This proves that Hamlet had some kind of planning for this degrading comment, and that his thoughts are not scattered and he is able to stay focused. There is a question of what insanity really is. Since it is agreeable that Ophelia was crazy, it s possible to use her as a guide to make this argument valid. Hamlet and Ophelia both shared the trait of having calculated thoughts. Ophelia s singing and Hamlet s verbal attacks.
They also shared calmness before their deaths. But was Hamlet spraying rude remarks to everyone before he died, as Ophelia had sung floating down the river? No, in fact, Hamlet was the opposite of what he was before. If he were crazy, like Ophelia, he would have remained hectic and random up until the time of, and after, the duel. Hamlet, though, was not. He even reasoned what death for him was, finishing his question of whether life was worth living for.
Hamlet can truly be seen to be sane. The facts that Hamlet was smart and swift thinking, and in such a reversal of emotions; from after Polonius died; in the end, leads strongly to the opinion that Hamlet was not insane.
Free research essays on topics related to: killed his father, polonius, rosencrantz and guildenstern, makes sense, insane
Research essay sample on Killed His Father Rosencrantz And Guildenstern
