NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
A child rebels against his father, because he thinks that his fathers rules are unjust; he thinks that if he rebels then maybe his father will change those rules. Rebellion may manifest itself itself in many ways: the child may refuse to eat, do his homework or even throw a temper tantrum. Some historians have argued that the above situation was very similar to the latin american uprising against the spanish crown. Although spain thought of the colonies as little sons, in need protection from revolutionary ideas. However, the source rebellious grievances differed greatly in each region of the new empire. The origins and manifsetatins of these grievances can be traced back to the pre-Columbian rulers in each region: the Aztecs, in what is now Mexico and Central America; the Incas in the Andean region of South America.
These pre- Columbian rulers left an imprint or lack there of on the people of their region; thus, shaping the indigenous society. Societies that would later rise up against the outside authority; either trying to replace it with the old Inca redeem, or they considered it weak and needed a new central government. Frist let us look at the conquest of Mexico by Hernan Cortez. Mexico and the Yucatan peninsular was ruled by the Aztecs.
The Aztecs rule was compromised by the arrival of the spanish. Cortez and his men were seen as Gods, who returned to save the poor from the tyrannical hands if the Aztecs. The pre-columbia civilization was centralized around the war god, Huitzilapochli, which meant they were constantly at war and the central system was in unrest. The Aztecs forced upon the people of Mexico, unfair trading practice, forced taxation and more importantly human sacrifice. They expand their territories not only usurp more and land from the people, but also to scarface hundreds of people to their god.
This relentless effort to expand their empire was viewed by the people of Mexico as barbaric and tyrannical. So when Cortez came riding into Mexico on white horses, promising to overthrow the tyrannical overlords. The gente corrientes cheered and reviewed the Spanish as their saviors, and embraced the Spanish rule. However, this was not the case in Peru with the Incas.
The Andean rulers although expand their empire by military means, they were more widely accepted amoung the people of Peru. The Incas has a very organized structure of power, that appealed to the people at every level. Unlike their Mexican counterparts, the Incas did not indicate the local government. The people were allowed to continue their on religious practiced. The social pmid now consisted of the Inca at the very top, followed by the ethnic chiefs, the aeolus and lastly the families. The close knit infrastructure made assimilation into the Inca society much easier.
The people enjoyed the stability and advanced technology of their new ruler; however, never were their original sense of community ever in danger. The Incas legitimization of the original community help tie the people to the old Inca way of living. After Pizarro's conquest, this communal tie to the Inca fostered rebellions as earlier as the sixteenth century. The Andean people wanted to return to what they viewed as the golden age of the Incas. The important question, however, is how did these differences were the bases of future rebellions? In the rebellion in Mexico, such as China and the rural rebellions, one can find common elements between the two Mexican rebellions.
The rural rebellions in Mexico are characteristics as being spontaneous, never having a distant leader. More importantly, they were small and short lived, never spreading outside the community. These characteristics are traced back tot eh communities ruled by the Aztecs. These communities in central and southern Mexico were fragmented; there was not a common language nor any power ethnic authorities, plus the tribes were a lot smaller. The Mexican tribes were seen as small communities, thrown together under one crown. These characteristics would manifest themselves later in key Mexican rebellions, which will be explored later in this essay.
As to Peru, it was based more upon a stable system of integration into the ruling society. The constant desire by the people to return to the Inca system is based upon the high accepted structure of Inca society. The Andean peoples been in community and its leadership played a major role in future rebellions. Both, the Taki Ongoy and Tupac Amaru rebellions tried to replace Spain rule with the Inca.
The people saw the Inca as a source of stability and prosperity, and wanted to erase the spanish and form a new and improved Inca government. Consequently the Tupac Amaru rebellion of 1780, was according to the participants, a continuation of the Taki Ongoy rebellion of the 16 th century. This essay will focus on two rebellions from each region of the new spain empire. Examining closely how each rebellion originated from the indigenous structure of society. It will also suggest that not only were the rebellions a consequence of racial pressures, but also a direct example of social violence. William Taylor defined te ebel lions in central and southern Mexico as, Localized mass attacks generally limited to restoring a customary equilibrium
Free research essays on topics related to: inca, pre columbian, tupac amaru, traced back, rebellions
Research essay sample on Tupac Amaru Pre Columbian
