NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
The Right to Bear Arms The right to bear arms is a constitutional guarantee, and is not open for discussion; however the United States Government has used its power to limit and regulate this guarantee. Our government has been attacking this right for years, and like a covert terrorist organization, it denies its action. Pretending that they just want to limit the right to bear arms is their blanket of protection. They will slowly move from under that protection only when the nation is ready to accept the loss of this right and when it doesnt appear to be huge a movement to give up that right. At some point in the future, the right to bear arms will be so limited that it will just be a natural move to ban firearms altogether. The Government believes that the banning or restricting of the right to keep and bear arms will decrease violence.
This has been the demand for the Government movement against gun rights for years. If you really think about it though, this notion is simply absurd. To demonstrate you must first separate Americans into two general categories. First there are the upstanding citizens who work to support themselves and / or a family. These people may experience some trouble with the law only because nobody's perfect.
The next category is the criminal. Many categories could be made out of this one, but to keep it simple, well just use one. These people generally have little respect for the law, and this is why many of them are in our jails and prisons. These are the people responsible for the murders, rapes, robberies, and other violent crimes in our society today. Now, if you present gun restrictions or a ban on guns to both of these categories, what will be the outcome? The outcome is the entire basis for why gun restriction has a reverse effect.
What happens is that you end up with a population of upstanding property owning citizens that are unarmed. This population generally yields to the laws, and therefore they freely give up their right to bear arms. The other side of that picture is the criminal. A man that robs liquor stores and shoots people gets the news that he will no longer be permitted by law to own a certain gun. What are the chances that when this person commits his next crime, he will stop and say, wait a second, I cant use this gun because its illegal. I will just have to beat my victim with a baseball bat instead.
Obviously this makes no sense at all. Why would a criminal that is willing to shoot someone with his gun, listen to a law that says he cant use that gun anymore? Creating bans or restrictions on gun rights leaves the upstanding citizen unarmed and helpless against the armed criminal. There are many studies that support this idea that more gun control results in more crime, but the idea is so basic, it almost needs no confirmation to know that its true. The United States Government would like us to stop using our brains and picture the whole world holding hands, singing out in harmony because guns no longer exist. What some government officials and politicians are trying to do here is interpret the constitution, and they are doing that through their own biases and opinions.
The politician s state in many articles that the government and militia were made of the people of the communities at the time the constitution was written. Why then do we need lofty politicians interpreting the constitution today? The constitution was written by men of the community and now is interpreted by the white house? The second amendment states that the right to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.
To me this is a simple statement, and I dont need the Chief Justice to tell me what it means. This essay is just one tiny spec of dust in the load of garbage the United States Government is throwing at the public regarding gun control and gun related violence. There are two opposing sides in the fight for individual rights. There is the public, full of individuals, against the government. I fall into the category of individuals, and my opponents include the Chief Justice. I cannot respect the opinions and articles of those who have agendas other than to spread the truth.
I ask you why should we listen to the spokesmen or puppets of the government s movement against our rights. How many rights do we have to lose before our fellow countrymen see the truth
Free research essays on topics related to: united states government, chief justice, gun control, constitution was written, bear arms
Research essay sample on United States Government Constitution Was Written
