NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
There is a negative relationship between support for abortion and the importance of religion, while controlling party affiliation. Among males, there is a negative relationship between support for abortion and Among females, there is a negative relationship between support for abortion and A persons religious background greatly influences whether or not they support abortion. When religion plays an important role in someones life, they are less likely to support abortion. Most religions strongly disapprove of the taking of someones life. They consider it one of the highest sins a human can commit.
They believe that abortion is considered murder because even a fetus has a spirit so it shall be considered a living human. When religion plays a less important role in a persons life, they are more likely to support abortion. These people are more likely to consider reasons for the abortion rather than never permitting it. These people tend to look at the women and why she is requesting the abortion.
They are less likely to consider a fetus a living being until it is The first hypothesis indicates that the higher the importance of religion is to a person the less supportive they would be of abortion, with regards to that persons political party affiliation. The party in which a person identifies with will have a direct effect on the link between support for abortion and the importance of religion. Political parties, as well as a persons religious background, play a major role in attitudes towards different issues. By nature, democrats are more likely to approve abortion than republicans. A persons religious background usually has an effect on which party they associate themselves with. Therefore, there must be a link between a persons party affiliation, religious background, The second and third hypotheses indicate that gender has an effect on support for abortion based on their religious beliefs.
I believe that men are less likely to approve abortion than women because of the womens movement that has been going on for years. Many women are more apt to approve of the idea of pro-choice. They want to decide what is best for them, not some politician in Washington, D. C. A 90 s women is more independent than say a 50 s women. They are battling for womens rights.
Abortion is a very controversial issue which directly effects womens rights. I believe that men are less likely to support womens rights because it will take power away from them. Most of our government positions are held by men. By giving the decision of abortion to women, it is taking away more of their power over us.
In order to test my hypotheses, I chose two variables and two controls. My dependent variable was support for abortion. This variable was based on four responses: never permitted, for rape or incest, if there was a clear health need, and always permitted. My independent variable was importance of religion.
Originally, this variable contained four scaled responses: high, 3, 2, and low. In order to receive more obvious results, I recoded the responses into to categories. The high consists of high and 3. The low consists of low and 2.
My first control variable was party affiliation. Originally, this consisted of seven responses: strong democrat, weak democrat, independent democrat, independent, independent republican, weak republican, and strong republican. In order to receive more accurate results, I recoded them down to three responses. Strong democrats, weak democrats and independent democrats were recoded to democrats. The independent response stayed the same. Finally, the independent republicans, weak republicans, and the strong republicans were recoded to republicans.
My second control was gender. These responses were simply male and female. Support for Abortion by Importance of Religion: 1996 Support for Abortion Low High Source: National Science Foundation, University of Michigan, 1996 Table 1 is the original table. It shows that 20. 6 % of people with a high importance level of religion never permit abortion. Of the other people with a high importance level of religion, 38. 5 % permit it for rape or incest, 13 % permit it if there is a clear health need, and 27. 9 % always permit it. Of the people with a low importance level of religion, 3. 4 % never permit it, 19. 9 % permit it for rape or incest, 19. 6 % permit it if there is a clear health need, and 57. 1 % always permit it.
This indicates that when religion plays a less important role, a person is more likely to support abortion. Pearson's Chi-square equals. 000. This shows that the relationship between religious importance and support for abortion is statistically significant. Kendall's tau-c equals -. 405. This shows that there is a negative relationship between the two variables and that relationship is statistically significant. Support for Abortion by Importance of Religion Among Democrats: 1996 (In Percentages) Support for Abortion Low High Source: National Science Foundation, University of Michigan, 1996 This table shows the relationship between the importance of religion and support for abortion among democrats. 19 % of Democrats with a high importance level of religion never permit abortion; 32. 3 % permit it for rape or incest, 13. 6 % support it if there is a clear health need and 35. 1 % always permit it.
Only 2. 3 % of Democrats with a low importance level of religion never permit abortion; 16. 3 % permit it in the case of rape or incest; 19. 6 % support it if there is a clear health need; and 61. 8 % always permit it. Both Pearson's chi-square and Kendall's tau-c show that there is a statistical significance level. These results indicate that when compared to the original table, the biggest effect of this control variable comes when asked whether or not the person always supports abortion. Democrats are more likely to always permit abortion. Support for Abortion by Importance of Religion Among Independents: 1996 Support for Abortion Low High Source: National Science Foundation, University of Michigan, 1996 Both Pearson's chi-square and Kendall's tau-c indicate that there is a significant statistical level in the variables. This data shows that 16. 7 % of independents with a high importance level of religion never permit abortion; 37 % permit it in cases of rape or incest; 24. 1 % support it if there is a clear health need; and 22. 2 % always permit it.
When independents with a low importance level of religion were asked their opinion of abortion: 3. 4 % never permitted it; 15. 5 % permitted in cases of rape or incest; 17. 2 % supported it if there was a clear health need; and 63. 8 % always permitted it. When compared to the above tables, this data indicates that again the largest percentage difference is among the response to always permitting abortion. It also shows that independents with a higher level of religious importance are more likely to permit abortion in the case of rape or incest rather than always permitting it. Support for Abortion by Importance of Religion Among Republicans Support for Abortion Low High Source: National Science Foundation, University of Michigan, 1996 Both Pearson's chi-square and Kendall's tau-c indicate that there is a statistical significance among the variables.
This table shows that 22. 3 % of Republicans with a high importance level of religion never permit abortion; 47. 1 % permit it in the case of rape or incest; 10. 7 % permit it if there is a clear health need; and 0 nly 19. 9 % always permit it. This table also shows that 4. 8 % of Republicans with a low importance level of religion never permit abortion; 25. 8 % support it in the case of rape or incest; 20. 3 % permit it if there is a clear health need; and 49. 1 % always permit it. This data indicates that Republicans with a more important religious background are more likely to support abortion if there has been a rape or incest than the other political parties. It is also obvious that Republicans with a lower level of religious background are more likely to always support abortion than Republicans with a higher religious importance.
Support for Abortion by Importance of Religion Among Males: 1996 Support for Abortion Low High Source: National Science Foundation, University of Michigan, 1996 Both Pearson's chi-square and Kendall's tau-c show that there is statistical significance level among the variables. This table shows that 20. 8 % of males with a high importance level of religion never support abortion; 41. 6 % support it in the case of rape or incest; 14 % permit it if there is a clear health need; and 23. 5 % always permit it. This table also shows that 4 % of males with a low importance level of religion never support abortion; 23. 6 % approve in the case of rape or incest; 21. 8 % permit it if there is a clear health need; and 50. 6 % always permit it. This table does not differ that much from the original table. But, there are small percentage differences in the responses to always permitting abortion and permitting it in cases of rape or incest. Support for Abortion by Importance of Religion Among Females Support for Abortion Low High Source: National Science Foundation, University of Michigan, 1996 The Pearson's chi-square and Kendall's tau-c both indicate a statistical significance level among the variables.
This table shows that 20. 5 % of females with a high importance level of religion never permit abortion; 36. 3 % permit it in cases of rape or incest; 12. 3 % support it if there is a clear health need; and 30. 9 % always permit it. This table also shows that only 3 % of females with a low importance level of religion never permit abortion; 15. 5 % support it in cases of rape or incest; 16. 7 % permit it if there is a clear health need; and 64. 9 % always permit it. When compared to the original table and table 5, it is obvious that women are more likely to always support abortion. In conclusion, my hypotheses were supported. Overall, people with a higher importance level of religion are less likely to support abortion for any reason. Independents with a low importance level of religion are more likely to always support abortion than democrats or republicans.
Republicans with a high importance level of religion are more likely to support abortion in cases of rape or incest and are the least likely to always support abortion. Overall, democrats and independents were more likely to support abortion for any reason than republicans. The data also supports my theory that women are more likely to always support abortion than men. Females with a low importance level of religion are the most likely to always support abortion. Men with a higher importance level of religion are more likely to permit abortion in cases of rape or incest. Overall, the results show that people in general are more likely to approve of abortion only in cases of rape or incest rather than always supporting it.
In conclusion, I think that people with less religious background are more likely to support abortion. However, no matter their religious background, party affiliation, or gender, when a significant reason for the abortion is presented (rape or incest specifically) they are all more likely to support it. Bibliography:
Free research essays on topics related to: important role, political parties, statistically significant, chi square, womens rights
Research essay sample on Chi Square Statistically Significant
