NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
One of the most interesting and influential thinkers of all time was Socrates, whose dedication to careful reasoning helped form the basis for philosophy. Socrates applied logical tricks in the pursuit for the truth. Consequently, his willingness to call everything into question and his determination to accept nothing less than an adequate account of the nature of things made him one of the first people to utilize critical philosophy. Although he was well known for his philosophical ways of thinking, Socrates never wrote anything down, so we are dependant on his students, like Plato, for any detailed knowledge of his methods or ways of thinking.
One of the early dialogues in which Plato had written was Euthyphro. The Euthyphro dialogue begins with Socrates becoming involved in a touchy conversation with an over confident young man, Euthyphro. Socrates finds Euthyphro perfectly certain of his own ethical morality even in the situation of prosecuting his own father in court. Socrates asks him to define what piety, or moral duty really is. He asks for something more than just lists of what pious actions are. Euthyphro is supposed to provide a general definition that captures the very basic nature of what piety is.
Euthyphro claims that he knows what it is to be pious, but every answer he offers is subjected to the full force of Socrates critical thinking. Socrates systematically refutes Euthyphro's suggestion that what makes right actions right is that the gods love, or approve of them. First, there is the problem that since questions of right and wrong often create endless disputes, the gods are likely to disagree among themselves about moral matters just as often as we do, making some actions both right and wrong. Socrates lets Euthyphro off the hook on this one by agreeing with him, but only for purposes of continuing the discussion.
More importantly, Socrates instigates a formal problem for Euthyphro from a deceivingly simple question, " Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods? " Neither choice can do the justice for which Euthyphro intends his definition of piety. If right actions are pious only because the gods love them, then moral rightness is completely optional, depending only on the impulses of the gods. But if the gods love right actions only because they are already right, then there must be some non-divine source of values, which we might come to know separately from their love. Plato's final answer to the question of what makes a pious act pious is to say that there is a form, piety itself, by virtue of which a pious act is pious.
Free research essays on topics related to: ways of thinking, euthyphro, pious, socrates, gods love
Research essay sample on Ways Of Thinking Gods Love
