Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: History Of England Annales Cambriae - 1,431 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Clodfelter 1 Christopher Clodfelter English 201 Mr. Miller February 14, 1999 King Arthur, an Enduring Legend The mystical references to Arthur and his adventures are dated in literature in some form for over 1400 years, verifying the enduring appeal of this romantic character. Since the beginnings of the English language there have been legends of great heroes. The first settlements of Britain produced stories rooted in ancient Celtic and Germanic imagination; of the many, Arthur is undoubtedly preeminent. The earliest known description of Arthur? s noble endeavors was written by Gildas, (ca. 490 - 540) the author of De excision et conquest Britanniae makes reference, albeit vague, to an Arthurian figure; however, the name Arthur is not mentioned in the story (Strayer 564).

The full flourish of writings associated with his miraculous feats and victories do not reach a crescendo for several hundred years after Gildas (Strayer 564). During the Middle Ages, however, Arthurian myth was prominent and en vogue and attempts to discover the truth behind the myth have been pursued for generations. Arthurs history, as Geoffrey Ashe reminds us in The Discovery of King Arthur, is more than just a medley of yarns, more than just a saga in the romanticism of myth. It puts him within a definite period. It names definite places and takes him to definite countries (3). It is this fact and the fragmentary, often contradictory references of an Arthur (the Latin Artur, Arturius, or Artorius) from ancient records, that lends enough validity to the story to set researchers on the Clodfelter 2 trail of the legendary king.

However, progress has been stymied for a number of reasons and even now we can say little of substance about the man behind the myth. A major difficulty facing researchers is that the role of the historian in the Dark Ages was rather flexible; a mixture of storyteller and propagandist whose regional traditions, personal prejudices, and loyalties were bound to greatly influence the nature of its material (Coglan 214). In Arthur, Richard Barber clarifies this fact and speaks of the early tendency to use history as? an inspiration or as a warning to the men of the present, or as part of a vast divine scheme for mans spiritual salvation (Coglan 7). Another problem facing historians is that the earliest sources we have are never originals, but copies, and considering their age we must allow for the propagation of errors. One possible such error is found in the Annals of Wales, written in the tenth century.

Its entry concerning the Battle of Badon claims that Arthur carried Christs cross on his shoulder for three days, but it? s likely that shoulder should instead be shield, due to confusion between the Welsh words said and suit (Alcock 51 - 52). The search for the truth of legend continues. Perhaps the best known of all Arthurian legends is that of Geoffrey of Monmouth. His History of the Kings of Britain, (ca. 1136) Besides planting highly erroneous notions of British history, supplied a basis and framework for Arthurian romance and exerted an influence extending through Spenser, Shakespeare, and many others (Coglan 209).

In it, Geoffrey recounts the history of Britains leaders back to their beginning in 1115 BC to King Cadwalladers death in AD 689. Geoffrey's account, though most agree not strictly factual, offers a clear look into the events surrounding Arthurs death and is the starting point for much investigation (Coglan 214). Geoffrey's work was immensely popular and was not criticized during his lifetime Clodfelter 3 (Goodrich 45). Modern historians, however, have many reasons to be skeptical of Geoffrey's work. The most obvious problem is its anachronistic representation of a supposedly 5 th century king in a very Norman England; as was typical of historians in his day, Geoffrey superimposed his contemporary culture upon his depiction of the past (Goodrich 47).

Many inaccuracies exist in his description of the period. If there is an Arthur, he will not be a magnificent Christian king sitting astride a heavy Byzantine charger, accoutered in Norman plate armor. He will not be basking in a mighty castle between European excursions with a band of international knights; rather, he will be no more than an unkempt and possibly pagan military leader with little if any armor. He will likely have a small entourage of hired regional soldiers and live in no better than a crude wooden fortress. Amazingly, Geoffrey's glaring inaccuracies were convincing enough to find their way into the Oxford History of England, written in 1937 (332). Geoffrey also made huge geographical errors, such as placing King Arthur in Cornwall (Goodrich 42).

He made errors in church history such as placing an Archbishop in Canterbury in Arthurs lifetime and an Archbishop in Caerleon (Brooke 202). Inaccuracies aside, Geoffrey? s romantic, fictional depictions have endured. Geoffrey is clearly a fiction writer, but there is little doubt that he drew from older works both historical and fictional.

Besides Roman historians he draws upon Gildas, Nennius, Bede, and probably the Annales Cambriae, as well as Welsh genealogical and hagiographic matter; yet an investigation into these older documents shed little light upon Arthur (Coglan 212). Gildas De Excidio Britanniae, mentioned earlier and despite its plainly erroneous historical section, is considered a key source simply because it? s the only one contemporary to Arthurs time. In it Gildas describes how a powerful ruler summoned Saxon help against his enemies only to find Clodfelter 4 that the Saxons had themselves become a threat. The Britons fought back under Ambrosius Aurelian us and had a series of victories which culminated at Badon, a battle usually attributed to Arthur (Strayer 565).

Once again, however, Gildas makes no mention of Arthur by name (Strayer 564). This silence, however, is not considered damaging to later claims. With Arthur, [Gildas] might have been silent because of his prejudices or because of a gap in his information. When he is dealing with events beyond living memory that information is certainly sparse; he leaves out important people who can be proved to have lived (Ashe 67). The next important document is Nennius Historia Brittonum, 800 AD; however, much of his work contains errors and inconsistencies and so is not trusted very much for accuracy (Coglan 404). Nennius is the first to actually mention Arthurs name and he gives a list of twelve battles attributed to Arthur.

According to Nennius, Arthur was not a king, but a dux bello rama leader of battles (Coglan 405). The earliest mention of Arthurs death comes from an entry in the Annales Cambriae, 950 AD. It claims he was slain in The Battle of Camlann in 537 AD. ? ? since everyone else who is mentioned in the Annals did exist, there is a certain presumption that a real Arthur must underlie [this] questionable [claim] (Coglan 8). While much of the information in the Annales is taken from Nennius, there is also evidence of early Celtic and Irish sources and it becomes inconsistent at certain points.

However, the dating is important in tracing a possible history for Arthur and the entries for Arthur are lent more validity because of the other figures mentioned there (Coglan 8). These are the primary sources for Arthurian studies, although there are other early documents which make some reference to a powerful warrior named Arthur. Despite valiant efforts of Arthurian historians to glimpse through the fog of the Dark Ages, Arthur has remained shrouded in mystery. King Arthur, however legendary he may be, is Clodfelter 5 still popular as a romantic hero and therefore we may expect these speculative pseudo-historical works to continue. In conclusion, I think Hollister (quoting James Campbell) summed it up rather well: as James Campbell wisely said, The natural vice of historians is to claim to know about the past. But with respect to fifth and sixth century Britain, what really happened will never be known (29).

Strayer, Joseph Reese. , et al. Dictionary of the Middle Ages. Vol. 1. New York: Scribner? s, 1982.

Alcock, Leslie. Arthurs Britain. London: Penguin Press, 1971. Ashe, Geoffrey. The Discovery of King Arthur. New York: Anchor Press, 1985.

Brooke, Christopher. The Archbishops of St. Davids, Llandaff, and Caerleon-on-the- Usk. Studies in the Early British Church. ed.

Chadwick, Nora K. Cambridge: Arson Books, 1966. Coglan, Ronan. The Encyclopedia of Arthurian Legends. Rockport: Element Inc. , 1992. Goodrich, Norma Lorre.

King Arthur. New York: Franklin Watts, 1986. Hollister, C. Warren. The Making of England. Lexington: D.

C. Heath, 1996. Collingwood, R. G. , and J. N. L.

Myres. Oxford History of England, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937.


Free research essays on topics related to: dark ages, history of england, king arthur, annales cambriae, arthurian legends

Research essay sample on History Of England Annales Cambriae

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com