NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Lord of The Flies Lord of the Flies a novel of pure brilliance or a novel of utter disgust? William Golding, a man to be looked upon in history as a man of sickening insights on human nature, wrote? Lord of the Flies? with complete lack of confidence in the human spirit. He looks at humans as if to say that we are born evil and we act proper only to live up to the expectations of society and not for a man, woman, or child? s own personal feeling of satisfaction.
This of course is true in certain cases but a man doesn? t go to a blood donor because he feels like losing a bit of blood, he goes because he knows by doing so he could be saving the life of another man. Thus contradicting Golding? s view on human nature. The novel even though I do not agree with the points presented within it, will be an inspiration to any and all novel writers from now until the end of time. Golding was able to display the scene?
s of violence so strongly in our minds through this novel that when the boys murdered Simon you can feel a painful sensation in the gut so strong you need to take a time out from reading to recover. His use of imagery makes it almost impossible to feel anything but shear sadness and pain every time one of the boys sharpened sticks penetrated Simon? s tattered body. Golding knew exactly the word to use in presenting a devil within us all. His novel presented the characters as individuals; he gave every one of them a personality and built on them as the novel progressed. The details he left out in describing them led our imaginations to fill it in and helped each character build a stronger persona.
He showed Ralph as a character so programmed into societies ways he was willing to give his life for it. He was a born leader, his public speaking techniques were so precise and hypnotic even Jack followed his order for a time. His desire for fire led to the break up of the boys, he was so caught up in getting rescued that he forgot that everyone on the island were only small children and couldn? t be expected to work every waken hour. He was stubborn in his ways and would not let himself feel defeated even when he had seen he had lost. His unwillingness to join Jack?
s tribe led to the death of his most trustworthy ally, Piggy. William Golding used Piggy as a boy infected with a disease that society placed in him, he was reliant on adults and democracy. When both failed he used his intellect to try to manipulate Ralph into preaching what he wanted the other boys to hear. He was used as a safeguard for the boys; if times were bad then the problems were put on Piggy with a simple? SHUT UP FATTY? . He was ridiculed because he was more intelligent than most of the boys; he used scientific answers to explain everything.
He didn? t understand that the laws of science could not explain life and human nature and welfare. His death symbolized the fall of democracy, the fall of realistic explanations and the fall of Ralph? s boys. Jack was shown as a boy who needed power and followers through the way he arrived the sound of the conch in the start with his choir following his every direction. He was smart in an evil way; he could use any loophole in his favor.
He used manipulation as a technique to get followers when he abandoned Ralph? s leadership. He used fun as an alibi to leave and told there would be no responsibility in his tribe, only hunting. He used dirty tricks to lower the boy? s trust in Ralph and used meat as a way to lure the boys he couldn? t recruit.
He was the definition of all that is wrong and all that is evil; he became a Hitler among the boys. He wanted only the strong to survive and used methods of torture to scare the boys into following his commands. Simon was made to show that we can? t kill all that is weak because he became the favorite character of the majority of the people.
If we used methods of totalitarianism then all boys like Simon would be lost so all people that were pure and sensitive would be staring death in the eyes. He was different then the rest of the boys in that he knew what was happening but he was too shy to do anything about it and he was looked upon as batty by all but Ralph. His death was made to show that even the brains of the smartest people could not handle the thought of a terrible word such as murder and to show that excuses are made to explain horrible things, even with the most intelligent of our society. In conclusion to the essay I feel that Golding? s novel illustrates a false view of human nature, he makes all men seem like ruthless savages when men are what they are and no study can explain the nature of any man or any living thing because no creation of God is the same. I think that placing the novel before a group of students who are not ready to face such a horrible fiction is disgusting and does not aid my life in any way except giving me a grim, bitter look at humanity and what it produces.
Free research essays on topics related to: lord of the flies, william golding, golding , ralph , human nature
Research essay sample on Lord Of The Flies Golding
