Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: State Of Nature State Of War - 1,345 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

According to the natural right theory, the state of nature is the original condition of human beings in regard to any common authority. In the state of nature, according to Thomas Hobbes, each individual has a right to everything, even the body / life of the other. The state of nature can lead to the state of moral chaos. Moral chaos produces physical chaos or war, thus the state of war, the war of all against all. The reason this is because no one has any connection to the other, everyone has the right to everything, just to satisfy his or her appetites. There is no rational rule to resolve conflict, in order to get around this you have to get an agreement, thus the need for a social contact.

The social contract is how governments are legitimated, or given the political right to rule. The social contract is the establishment of a sovereigns right to rule over subjects, you have to give up your right to everything except the right to life, thats the only thing you retain when you make an agreement with other subjects. The sovereign is above the social contract; its not a party to it, but an enforcer of the rules that it applies. The agreement is useless unless there is a sovereign to govern the will of an agreement. We decide what we give our rights to, and then the sovereign carries those rights out, without the interference of the people as a whole. According to John Locke, the government is legitimated in a similar means.

Except that in the state of nature not everyone has the right to everything. For Locke you cant just go into the state of nature and just kill someone; unlike Hobbes, you have to preserve your neighbor unless its your life at stake, then you must preserve your self. Its not automatically the state of war, for Locke. Thus government like, just as it is for Hobbes, can exist only by consent. To get out of the state of nature we need to retain our natural rights, the rights to liberty (self-preservation and preservation of others) and the right to property. The same rules that apply to liberty also apply to property for Locke.

Property rights are prior (in principle) to government, you have a right to life and property without government. Its settling your disputes that may make it hard to do without government. The state of nature becomes the state of war when enforcement problems occur, disagreements; thus the reason for government is to preserve pre-existing rights. To get out of the state of nature government can exist only by consent and you cant consent for anyone else, unless of course they are children. There are two major elements of Locke's social contract.

Phase # 1 is the bare agreement to agree. People have to realize the need for government, the need for something to solve problems of the people. For Hobbes this is like a bare leap into government. For Locke, there must be societies were people agree to communicate and talk in order to unanimously agree on a government.

And if someone decides that they dont want to join, well, you cant do any harm to them, or compel them to join your society. Unlike Hobbes, for Hobbes if you dont join the society and agree to the establishment of a sovereign then everyone else has the right to either force you to join your social contract or they have the right to do harm to you. The reason being is because that one individual that still resides in the state of nature has the right to everything and this by its self threatens yours and every ones safety. For Locke's phase # 2, it is the establishment of a government, society consents to form government, when they agree to establishment there is next a constitution established, rules that determine government of the day.

For Hobbes the sovereign is above the social contract. If the sovereign was part of the contract then there was a dispute, you would be back in the state of nature, thus the sovereign is above to make it work. The members of society are the contract. For Locke the members of a society are parties of the contract. Government is an agent for society, government still is not part of society, but society is above government. This is the exact opposite for Hobbes, as I said earlier.

Hobbes fears anarchy, thus he wants government / sovereign to be above society. For Locke if an agent acts un accordingly then the agents right to act as your agent is dissolved; it has acted outs side your trust and on your behalf, thus this means it is dissolved. In terms of looking at our current political system, I feel that natural rights are bases for our system, at least to a certain extent. If you look at Locke and his ideas about the right to life and right to property, then yes, there is that part of his theory in our system today.

In contrast though, I dont necessarily remember ever signing into this system we have today. I dont remember actually agreeing to a social contract, although, I suppose that our system has to work on implied consent. Which means that there is a silent consent to agree to that form of government, if you dont disagree then there fore you must agree. I think that Hobbes and Locke's view of social obligation is simple. Hobbes feels that as long as government is doing its job for you then everything is going good. You dont worry about your neighbor or anyone else.

If their life is being threatened then that is their problem, your worries only go as far as your family. As for Locke, he is more logical I think; he says that if government is threatening someone else then what is stopping that government from threatening you. Locke is more worried about tyranny, were Hobbes is more worried about anarchy. They both say that if your government is doing its job you dont have the social authority or obligation to dismiss it, dont fix what is not broken. I think that Hobbes has a much more strict idea of social obligation, after all he doesnt want a revolt of any kind, unless its you directly or your family that is being harmed. As for Locke, his whole theory is based on the idea of a right to revolt.

He still doesnt want you to revolt if the system is working, but on the other hand when it is not working. The people have the right to throw out government if it misbehaves and reestablish a new government. I think the strongest point to the natural right theory is this idea that you have a right to life and property. You can see these ideas in many societies today. These concepts of no one can take away your life or property, they were directly used in our government, Jefferson put them right smack in the middle of the bill of rights. And in my view that is one of the more important documents our government was founded on, but what do I know.

As far as weak points, I still dont like this idea of implied consent. I just dont see how it is that anyone can actually consent without doing it physically. I understand the concept behind it; I just dont like it. I never agreed to anything, I like forced consent better, if you think about it. I never had any other choice, its either use this form of government or be forced to live your life in back of a jail cell. But I guess Hobbes and Locke would say why disagree with the government if it working.

Bibliography A 5 page report on the Natural rights of humans from a Hobbsian and Lockian point of view. It discusses the state of nature and the natural property rights ect. 34 d


Free research essays on topics related to: state of war, hobbes and locke, form of government, state of nature, social contract

Research essay sample on State Of Nature State Of War

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com