NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Historical Macbeth Compared To Shakespeare's Macbeth Essay, Historical Macbeth Compared To Shakespeare's Macbeth Historical MacBeth compared to Shakespeare's MacBeth Although most of Shakespeare s play MacBeth is not historically accurate, MacBeth s life is the subject of the tragedy. There are characters and events that are based on true events and real persons but, Shakespeare s MacBeth differs significantly from history s MacBeth. The first example of a difference between the Shakespeare MacBeth and historical MacBeth is the death of Duncan I. In Shakespeare s MacBeth, Duncan I was murdered by MacBeth. A prophecy said to MacBeth by one of the three witches All hail, MacBeth, that shalt be King hereafter 1. was what prompted Gruoch, MacBeth s wife to plot the murder of Duncan I as he slept in their castle.
In history, MacBeth established himself as the King of Scots after killing his cousin Duncan I, in battle near Elgin not as in Shakespeare s play by killing him in his sleep. Duncan I was killed on August 14, 1040. MacBeth then reigned as king for seventeen years. As previously stated Duncan I and MacBeth were cousins, a fact not brought out in the play. Shakespeare loosely based the play, MacBeth on events he found in Raphael Holinshed s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland. Raphael Holinshed s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland, are the materials that furnished Shakespeare with his plot 2.
The chronicles were an account of the history of the country of which they came from. Another major difference, is that Duncan I was not the ageing and respected king Shakespeare makes him out to be, In real life, Fiona Somerset Fry author of History of Scotland says He was actually an impetuous and spoilt young man whose six years of kingship brought glory neither to Scotland nor to his family 3. In the play s last scene, Mc Duff kills MacBeth and automatically becomes the new King of Scots. In actual history MacBeth is killed by Malcom III but Lulach, MacBeth s stepson, becomes the king after the noblemen of Moray fight for his succession. Lulach reigned for seven months and was then dethroned by Malcom III of Caen more.
MacBeth is presented in the play as clumsy and unorganized. In reality though, he was one of the best kings that Scotland ever had. During his reign, he went on a pilgrimage to Rome for several months 4. His kingdom was in well enough order and he was in high enough regard with his nobleman that he could leave for a long period of time.
Another way you could tell that MacBeth was a good king because, He organized troops of men to patrol the wilder countryside and enforce some type of law and order 5. As far as historians know, this was the first type of law and order in Scotland before 1100. Shakespeare had financial and political motivation to change some of the historical facts. In order for him to receive payment for his writing it was necessary for him to impress King James I. Shakespeare also changed the name of his acting company to the Kings men, because he wanted to establish himself as a better writer. He could do this by having the King s influence.
Free research essays on topics related to: type of law, law and order, play macbeth, shakespeare play, shakespeare macbeth
Research essay sample on Law And Order Type Of Law
