NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Who, or what, is responsible for the death of Willy Loman? Was he a victim of modern American society, or did he simply lack the morals and ethics that would have led him to success and happiness? A large controversy engulfs Arthur Miller? s most famous play, Death of a Salesman, and, more precisely, the cause of the protagonist? s death. Willy Loman can clearly be viewed as a victim of the American machine, as observed through his frequently ambivalent attitudes concerning the importance place on pride and being well liked, as well as the self delusion he displays in his affair and many other aspects of life.
One of the many false, contrived attitudes contemporary America instills in its citizens is a very fierce pride, in which they cannot accept criticism and are blind to reality. Willy Loman took such a pride in his work, claiming himself to be? ? vital in New England? (Miller 14), and concurrently viewed himself as a failure. Although Willy? ?
was wonderful with his hands? (Miller 138), he saw any profession in carpentry or construction as an inadequate measure of success, although he was aware that he took pleasure in putting up a ceiling and building an extra room to his home. As a travelling salesman, the ultimate symbol of an American occupation and one he so revered, Willy also saw himself as a failure. But I gotta be at it ten, twelve hours a day. Other men? I don? t know?
do it easier. I don? t know why? I can? t stop myself? I talk too much.
A man oughta come in with a few words? I? m fat. I? m very? foolish to look at (Miller 37).
Even after being unscrupulously fired by Howard Wagner, his young employer, in his thirty-sixth year of work, he was too haughty to accept a job offer from his neighbour and good friend, Charley, regardless of the desperation he felt. Willy failed in selling because he couldn? t succeed living life by a false standard of making money by lying and cheating, despite the pride he sporadically took in it. During modern times, great emphasis has been placed on the importance of acquiring many acquaintances. Willy Loman was not an exception, maintaining? ? that a man can end with diamonds here on the basis of being liked? (Miller 86) and coincidentally acknowledged that his colleagues had little respect for him and ridiculed him when he attempted to make a sale.
He equated having success in life with earning money and keeping up appearances, rather than the greater value of love that he received from his family, which resulted in him teaching this to his sons, Happy and Biff, which consequently resulted in their unhappiness and failure. Denial, in more recent years, has been considered a justifiable means of avoiding an uncomfortable situation. This very thing played a large role in Willy Loman? s lifestyle. Years after having an affair during his marriage to Linda, Willy denied to himself that he took part in this betrayal, in spite of the fact that it was one of the main things contributing to his delusions.
He felt relentless guilt over the affair, but continually tried to ignore it and push it to the back of his mind. He realized the severity of what he had committed when Biff, as a young man, caught him in a hotel with his mistress. Willy suggested that when Biff grew up, he would understand what had transpired and rationalized that? ? you mustn? t overemphasize a thing like this? (Miller 120). This, combined with Willy?
s seeming disrespect for Linda, proved to leave an impression on his sons. Willy left the same legacy to Happy, who continued to treat women in the similar manner. Although Willy was extremely remorseful for his adultery and truly loved Linda, he was never able to admit this and make it blatantly clear. Parents in the nineteenth century have continuously been pressured to encourage their children to succeed in life. Willy Loman evidently felt confused as to whether it was necessary to push his sons, particularly Biff, into the business world to ensure their? success?
in life, or to encourage them to do just what they felt impassioned to do. While discussing their son with Linda, Willy, within a few lines of the play, said both? Biff is a lazy bum! ? (Miller 16) and? There? s one thing about Biff? he?
s not lazy? (Miller 16). He knew that, while not succeeding in the business world, Biff still had potential to succeed in what he truly wanted to achieve. As Elia Kazan once said, ? Willy is one vast contradiction, and this contradiction is his downfall? (1). His frequent ambivalent attitudes on pride, being well liked, success and his affair contribute to this contradiction, and portray Willy Loman as a victim of little more than a capitalistic paradigm. Death of a Salesman is a thoughtful criticism of the moral and social standards of contemporary America and the confusion it infuses in its citizens?
Willy Loman is simply a victim of the deterioration thereof Works Cited Miller, Arthur. Death of a Salesman. New York: Penguin Books, 1976. Kazan, Elia. Notebook.
New York, 1960. A Theater In Your Head. Ed. Liza McAllister. Williams.
Oct. 2000. Pinkmonkey. 3 Oct 2000. web Member Frame. asp .
Free research essays on topics related to: willy loman, oct 2000, business world, death of a salesman, willy
Research essay sample on Death Of A Salesman Willy Loman
