Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Marx And Engels Political Philosophy - 1,114 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

The Egoism of Max Stirner (The following extracts are taken from my booklet entitled THE EGOISM OF MAX STIRNER: SOME CRITICAL BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTES to be published by the Mackay Society of New York) Albert Camus Camus devotes a section of THE REBEL to Stirner. Despite a fairly accurate summarization of some of Stirner's ideas he nonetheless consigns him to dwelling in a desert of isolation and negation drunk with destruction. Camus accuses Stirner of going as far as he can in blasphemy as if in some strange way an atheist like Stirner can blaspheme against something he does not believe in. He proclaims that Stirner is intoxicated with the perspective of justifying crime without mentioning that Stirner carefully distinguishes between the ordinary criminal and the criminal as violator of the sacred. He brands Stirner as the direct ancestor of terrorist anarchy when in fact Stirner regards political terrorists as acting under the possession of a spook. He furthermore misquotes Stirner by asserting that he specifies in relation to other human beings kill them, do not martyr them when in fact he writes I can kill them, not torture them and this in relation to the moralist who both kills and tortures to serve the concept of the good'.

Although throughout his book Camus is concerned to present the rebel as a preferred alternative to the revolutionary he nowhere acknowledges that this distinction is taken from the one that Stirner makes between the revolutionary and the insurrectionist. That this should occur in a work whose purpose is a somewhat frantic attempt at rehabilitating ethics well illustrates Stirner's ironic statement that the hard fist of morality treats the noble nature of egoism altogether without compassion. Eugene Fleischmann Academic treatment of Stirner is often obfuscating even when it is not downright hostile. A marked contrast is Fleischmann's essay STIRNER, MARX AND HEGEL which is included in the symposium HEGELS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY. Clearly preferring Stirner to Marx, Fleischmann presents a straightforward account of his ideas unencumbered by psychiatric interpretations and ad hominem arguments. He correctly points out that the human self signifies for Stirner the individual in all his indefinable, empirical concreteness.

The word unique [einzige] means for Stirner man as he is in his irreducible individuality, always different from his fellows, and always thrown back on himself in his dealings with them. Thus, when he talks of egoism as the ultimate definition os the human essence it is not at all a question of a moral category... but of a simple existential fact. Fleischmann contends that Marx and Engels critique of Stirner is notoriously misleading.

It is not just that ridicule of a mans person is not equivalent to refutation of his ideas, for the reader is also aware that the authors are not reacting at all to the problems raised by their adversary. Stirner is not simply just another doctrinaire ideologue. His reality is the world of his immediate experience and he wants to come into his own power now, not after some remote and hypothetical proletarian revolution. Marx and Engels had nothing to offer the individual in the present: Stirner has. In his conclusion Fleischmann states that Stirner's view that the individual must find his entire satisfaction in his own life is a reversion to the resigned attitude of a simple mortal. This is not a serious criticism.

If I cannot find satisfaction in my own life, where can I find it? Even if it is my satisfaction that I experience, any satisfaction that the other may have being something that he or she experiences not me. If this constitutes being a simple mortal then so be it, but that it is a resigned attitude is another matter Benedict Lachmann and Herbert Stourzh Lachmanns and Stourzh's TWO ESSAYS ON EGOISM provide a stimulating and instructive introduction to Stirner's ideas. Although both authors give a good summary of his egoism they differ sufficiently in their approach to allow the reader to enjoy adjudicating between them. Lachmann's essay PROTAGORAS NIETZSCHE STIRNER traces the development of relativist thinking as exemplified in the three philosophers of its title.

Protagoras is the originator of relativism with his dictum Man (the individual) is the measure of all things. This in turn is taken up by Stirner and Nietzsche. Of the two, however, Stirner is by far the most consistent and for this reason Lachmann places him after Nietzsche in his account. For him Stirner surpasses Nietzsche by bringing Protagorean relativism to its logical conclusion in conscious egoism the fulfilment of ones own will. In fact, he views Nietzsche as markedly inferior to Stirner both in respect to his style and the clarity of his thinking. In contrast to Nietzsche's work, he writes, THE EGO AND ITS OWN is written in a clear, precise form and language, though it avoids the pitfalls of a dry academic style.

Its sharpness, clarity and passion make the book truly shattering and overwhelming. Unlike Nietzsche's, Stirner's philosophy does not lead to the replacement of one religious spook by another, the substitution of the Superman for the Christian God. On the contrary, it makes the individuals interests the centre of the world. Intelligent, lucid and well-conceived, Lachmann's essay throws new light on Stirner's ideas. Its companion essay, Stourzh's MAX STIRNERS PHILOSOPHY OF THE EGO is evidently the work of a theist, but it is nonetheless sympathetic to Stirnerian egoism. Stourzh states that one of his aims in writing it is beyond the categories of master and slave to foster an intellectual and spiritual stand-point different from the stand-point prescribed by the prophets of mass thinking, the dogmatists of socialism, who conceive of the individual only as an insignificant part of the whole, as a number or mere addenda of the group.

Stourzh draws a valuable distinction between the imperative approach of the moralist and the indicative approach of Stirner towards human behaviour. He also gives an informative outline of the critical reaction to Stirner of such philosophers as Ludwig Feuerbach, Kuno Fischer and Eduard von Hartman. Stourzh mars his interpretation, however, by making the nonsensical claim that Stirner's egoism need in no sense mean the destruction of the divine mystery itself. And in line with his desire to preserve the sacredness of this divine mystery he at times patently seeks to sweeten Stirner by avoiding certain of his most challenging remarks. References: Camus, Albert: THE REBEL: AN ESSAY ON MAN IN REVOLT.

Knopf, New York. 1961 Fleischmann, Eugene: THE ROLE OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN PRE-REVOLUTIONARY SOCIETY: STIRNER, MARX AND HEGEL in HEGELS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY. Cambridge University Press, London. 1971 Lachmann, Benedict and Stourzh, Herbert: TWO ESSAYS ON EGOISM. To be published by The Mackay Society, New York.


Free research essays on topics related to: stand point, egoism, political philosophy, marx and engels, marx

Research essay sample on Marx And Engels Political Philosophy

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com