Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Division Of Labor Neo Liberal - 2,166 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

The Third Way Throughout the past centuries, much of our worlds nations have converted from various types of governments to a democracy of some kind. Of all of the countries that have switched to this type of government, none has found this form of government to be undesirable. What is it that makes Democracy so impressive? The answer to this question is both obvious and abstract. In many ways, understanding Democracy is easily explained, yet it is also very complex because every nation has a different way of running their democratic nation. Britain, France, Germany and Italy, are considered successful, and have all been newly united under the European Union.

Although all four of the countries are considered successful, they all have their individual strengths and weaknesses, proving that each Democracy as individualistic. I will try to examine the underlying concepts of the Third Way and the solutions it has to offer on some of the major issues confronting contemporary British and European politics. I shall in no way be able to do justice in this short essay by discussing the Third Way in any detail as the Third Way itself has proven to be a very ambiguous subject. I am proposing to structure this essay in a way so that I shall be able to cover three to four central ideological concepts of Blair's Third Way. We live in a world of dramatic change and the old ideologies that have dominated the last century do not provide the answers. (Tony Blair). Do you think Blair's Third Way provides the answer?

What is the Third Way? Its critics claim that it is eyewash, void of any real substance. They hold it to be a collaboration of policies, which are with out any real content. They define the Third Way as being undefined, an elusive set of doctrines which have been taken from existing ideologies on order to form an incoherent set of policies.

They argue that the underlying concept of the Third Way is in no way unique, its remnants can be found littered throughout the twentieth century where a compromise or a third way has a always been sought to the problems of that particular time. The emergence of Blair's Third Way was the acceptance of economic globalization as a fact with all its consequences for economic growth in a highly competitive world market and the type of jobs, which it is going to make available. Globalization, however, is a highly ambiguous term. It is multidimensional in its scope and ambivalent in its meaning.

There is much evidence to support the fact that communication; effects of ecological destruction, diseases, cultural encounters and migration to a certain extent are transgressing political frontiers. The nation states are more than ever playing an increasingly dominant role on the world stage. Financial markets have undergone globalization. There yet remains to be seen a single worldwide marketplace in which all economic unities compete with each other. This is further proof that this is not synonymous to comprehensive economic globalization. Just as economic and social change were critical to sweeping the right to power, so they were critical to its undoing.

The challenge for the Third Way is to engage fully with the implications of the change. The changes he identifies concern global markets and culture, technological advance and information industries. There is now a global attempt to apply progressive values in new ways. The debate about the Third Way is vital to politics in the 21 st century. (Tony Blair) The Third Way seeks to promote global developments at both the local and national level.

Proponents of the Third Way argue that the advancement of global markets and technologies, enhance the ideals of community, locally, nationally, and globally this being a response to change and insecurity. With this there will come a new political agenda, which is founded, on mutual responsibility across the globe. These aims will have far-reaching consequences in terms of opportunities for people and businesses through the achievement of an open world and an open economy. However, its success they claim will rest on a strong mutual feeling of certain values through a global commitment to help those affected by debt, environment and genocide. According to their plans, globalization is meant to serve as a great engine of economic growth, spurring innovation and making capital and labor much more productive than they were under protectionism.

They are not ignorant of the fact that there are major obstacles to achieving their objectives such as undeveloped civil societies which leads to undemocratic regimes, there is a need for democratic leaders to announce a global war on poverty are a few. Nevertheless they stress hope in that the Asian economies who are known as tiger economies have shown great resolve and their exemplified advances has shown that the global economy has great potential. Proponents of the Third Way argue that class is no longer the driving force in politics and that the old divisions of left and right are meaningless. They base their argument on the premise that in a world, which is rapidly in a constant state of flux in terms of technology and globalization. A new innovative and powerful form of politics is vital. They stress that there are no borders that cannot be transgressed in order to find the solutions deemed necessary for the problems facing the contemporary period.

The politics of left and right should be interchangeable and no barriers to entry must exist between left and right if politics is to be prosperous. The undifferentiated neo-liberal use of the globalization argument is to a high degree ideological, mainly designed to make labor demands illegitimate, macroeconomics and the claim of all political responsibility for the outcome of the economy. Thus it is one of the crucial watersheds between neo-liberal and social democratic politics how the term globalization is defined and which consequences are derived from it. For a critical use of the argument, that takes into consideration its conditions and limitations, two consequences are vital. This is a crucial period for the European Union. We need new thinking about democracy and economic development.

Tony Giddens gives us some vital clues about how to achieve these aims. (Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission) The first is that the real shape and amount of globalization does not render macro-economic policies and political responsibility for the entire economy being obsolete. The second is that much of the political influence, which has been lost to globalization, can be regained and re-established at a regional level, an argument that is particularly valid for the European Union. In addition, concepts to develop more comprehensive and effective transitional and even global regimes to regulate the global economy are no mere illusions. GATT shows that there is scope for political framework setting, which possibly is subject to further amplification if only there is the political, will to do so. It has been argued that Blair talks of a workforce that must compete in the global market place, no doubt against other workforces and with the cheapness of labor as their main selling point, this again is a distinctive policy framework maybe that of the previous conservatism government. They argue that Blair's Third Way has shown no intentions to alter the fact that will switch the million of pounds gifted to the transitional subsidies into investment for home based companies, which would not desert this country and their local workforce.

In short, they stop short of declaring that Blair's Third Way government is powerless to do anything at all in the face of globalization and its not so free market forces. Rethinking governance within the respective political roles of government and society is one of the central impulses of the Third Way. This concept has two dimensions. The first is a functional one; it stems from the experience that in highly complex modern societies it is increasingly difficult to try to steer the development of societies from a strategically political apex, which is placed at the top of the pyramid of society and unable to oversee to a sufficient extent its performances, problems and functions. The idea has become prominent that modern governance requires new forms of co-operation between the political system and civil society, in other words a new division of labor between state and social actors. Increasingly government becomes a partner of societal agents, acting as a broker, facilitating, inspiring and monitoring.

The devolution of power to a certain extent seems to be a functional necessity in todays complex post-industrial societies. The second dimension of the transfer of political functions onto civil society is a cultural one, based on ongoing processes and declared needs to rebalance the individual's sense of rights and obligations in modern societies. A reinforcement of the individual's sense of obligation can regularly strengthen the citizens' propensity to see first whether they can themselves jointly solve problems which emerge in their daily life sphere by spontaneous co-operation, and only inasmuch as this is not possible, delegate it for effective resolution to the political system. In this dimension, a new division of labor between state and society is not in the first instance a question of simply discarding state functions and leaving their fulfillment to the discretion of private actors.

It is rather about rendering a good deal of state intervention superfluous as the job is done in society itself on a voluntary basis. The Third Way proposes the restructuring of some key parts of the welfare state. There are changes within the society, which make appropriate changes in welfare state structures unavoidable. The most consequential ones are medical technology growth, the ratio of working-age population to old-age population decrease, unemployment insurance and the need for the new labor market.

Even though the welfare state is badly in need of reform this should be done in such a manner as to preserve the basic objectives for which it has been invented. The Neo-liberal remedy is straightforward: reduce the welfare state and resign vis-a-vis the power and the wisdom of the market. This will, so the neo-liberals suggest, immediately ease the burden on public budgets and eventually adapt workers expectations and attitudes to the facts of the labor market. As neo-liberal, thinking considers the market both an unparalleled mechanism of rational decision-making and a basic value, the social costs of such a strategy are neglected in theory and tolerated in practice. Third Way thinking is definitely considered right by its proponents in their basic assumption that it would be irresponsible and stupid to take refuge in merely defending the traditional welfare state while attacking neo-liberal irresponsibility.

Re-engineering the old welfare state structures is inevitable, but only insofar as this helps to make it sustainable. This holds true for all the classical pillars of the welfare state. In respect to old age pension, more scope for choice is needed. The individual should decide how much of his income he would like to save now in order to be able to spend it later, but a bottom line, which guarantees a dignified life after retirement, should be maintained. Unemployment benefits should be conditioned on the acceptance of job offers.

The message of the Third Way is however a renewal of the idea that each citizen is entitled to a dignified standard of living when all his own efforts have failed. The guarantee of a decent life is not dependent on economic merit but a human right. It might be more necessary than before that the individual can prove that he has undertaken everything possible to earn his own living, but in case of failure, he has a right to social solidarity and he has a right that the blame for market failures are not put on his shoulders alone. In addition, to poverty and insecurity he would be stigmatized with failure, remorse and blame. For all these reasons, the Third Way could prove a meaningful concept for the renewal of social democracy only to the degree to which it offers meaningful welfare state reforms without discarding the guarantee of social security.

Otherwise, it would not only damage the public identity of social democracy and deny its confession of basic values, but also contribute to social disintegration. Third Way project must conform by a concept not just of opportunities for all, but of social justice, which implies the guarantee of a minimum standard of material well being. Of course, such a guarantee implies the individual's obligation to seize every opportunity offered to him by the markets or the society to make his own living. Thus, employability may be one of the useful objectives for welfare state reform, but not the sufficient condition for a renewed social democratic project as long as there are not enough jobs available for everybody. Bibliography: New Statesman (In a speech of the Third Way), 22 May 1998 New Statesman (Social Capital, the economy and the third way), 26 May 1998 Britain recycling the Third Way, Alan Ryan, 1999 web


Free research essays on topics related to: economic globalization, division of labor, neo liberal, tony blair, modern societies

Research essay sample on Division Of Labor Neo Liberal

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com