NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... Without counting the historical records as to the immigration, Canada encounters the probability of inflation increase in the result of the labor cost rises. Till this time, it has never been a problem, but who knows what changes can bring? Economic Regulations can take some active actions within time to eliminate inflation rise. Such actions usually do not pass painless for the economy. We know this from the economic history of the United States.
What happened recently in 2000, when unemployment rates went so low that it caused almost a panic at the developing companies. The companies of such industries like pharmaceutical, high technology and some other felt the need for qualified workers. At that moment, there were no enough specialists at the labor market. What could they possibly do in this situation? They offered a better salary to the specialists who worked at the neighbor companies. Most probably, they agreed.
But what economic consequences did it bring? The producer prices began to rise with the production costs increases. In this case, Federal Open Market Committee did what they usually do in such cases. They raised rates. Raising rates always puts a burden on the developing economy.
But the USA economic history, it took a very small period of time and size, so that it did not have much influence. This chain of events can be easily traced from the macro economy principles. In this case, can bureaucracy goals and desire to put a better filter be put on the same scale with the economy? What if the change in Canadas Immigration Policy is the first step towards slowing of Canadas economy?
What other possible consequences such changes can bring? But from the other side, being compared again with Canadas neighbor, the United States did not have favorable laws for immigrants for a substantial period of time. Americas outdated immigration law simply was not geared to admit the very ones the country needed most. Following a principle that had remained unchanged since 1952, the law offers the right of immigration based on family preference. As a result, the vast majority of new arrivals were spouses and children. Once newcomers became citizens, they in turn brought in their families.
Since these immigrants skills were never a factor in whether or not they were admitted, any benefits that they brought to the United States economy were coincidental. 3 Only about 10 per cent of the American immigrants possessed important skills. Usually, such applicants qualified solely on the basis of their education or ability. At that time, Canada had a more sensible policy which aimed to expand opportunities for those immigrants who possessed skills in short supply. Basically, the United States did not suffered much of the absence of the sensible policy.
And it remains only to hope that the changes in Canadas Policy would not influence much the economy. The previous immigration system was much better at selecting the high-in-demand skilled workers. It incorporated an occupation demand list. This is no doubt Canadian identity as a strong economic country is shaped by some factors including immigration policies.
It is in the need of immigrants, especially during the current labor shortage. The immigration Policy played the essential part of the economy development throughout the history. The people who want to immigrate to Canada are not just garbage. It is historically seen what importance they had in building one of the strongest economic countries in the world.
My specific view as to the policy is that the rules have to be made more loyal and friendly for the applicants. Canada has to look into the future and care about the coming generations. The concept of applying new rules to cases already in process is not acceptable and does not have plenty of common sense. What about the money that people already spent for taking the immigration procedures. There is no reasonable justification for doing this. Many exceptional skilled worker applicants will be needlessly refused.
This is also not acceptable in any way for an adequate government behavior. The economic demands have to be satisfied. Or it will create the problems one day. The immigration department claims they are doing this for administrative convenience since they do not want to spend extra time assessing cases under both systems. Yet it takes no extra time to do this and actually takes more time to assess cases under the new system. It happens since additional information from each applicant is required.
All submissions to the Immigration Department by legal experts, employer groups and the House of Commons Standing Committee on Immigration warned against this policy of retroactivity, but the Immigration Department refused to listen. 6 This is a fundamental shift from the previous policy. And this shift can be the dramatic mistake, the possibility of which we discussed before in the paper. The immigration department will process cases under the old system until March 2003, but a huge number of cases will not be finalized by this date. It looks like nobody knows what to do with the cases, except for stamping them denied.
This is not the way serious political decisions have to be made. Such applicants should qualify under the old rules. This is the minimum to be done. The new selection criteria, to my opinion, has to changed to give more chances for decent people.
More applicants will qualify. They will fill the work places and will gain make input into Canadas Economy. The new selection grid must give chance to single applicants and applicants who do not have job offers or family in Canada. The people, who have not worked or studied in Canada, also require some positive attitude in the selection process. But historically, it had a very important issue. As it was already said that under the previous system an applicant needed 70 points out of 110.
Now applicants need 75 out of 100. The points are said to be much harder to obtain. I think, things have to change back to the old system. The Immigration Department, under the guise of opening up the system, has closed the old system. It might be the mistake. More than 75 % of new applicants do not qualify even though they are highly educated and experienced and fluent in English.
Is it not a paradox? The country needs specialists, and at the same time, denied to welcome them. There is no proof or reasonable justification for many of the items in the new selection grid. Applicants with 2 -year college degrees get more points then applications with 2, 3 or 4 -year university degrees. Single applicants are penalized and usually can't qualify.
The system relies heavily on applicants who have worked or studied in Canada, when in fact most have not. French is now a major factor in getting approval although, French is not a significant factor outside of Quebec. 7 Canadas immigration policy has to change to the one that has reasonable justification, and should be directed to easing the strict rules. It will be absolutely correct from the utilitarian point of view. The majority of people including the loyal citizens of Canada will benefit, as the economic growth continues. The mutual understanding and keeping word is important in this case. According to the new standards, applicants are required to file their application in the country of their Nationality or the country in which they have had legal status for at least 1 year.
Many applicants will be penalized and discriminated, as the processing times in their home countries are rather long. 6 This is discriminatory and unfair. Requiring applicants to have legal status in the country where they are applying will affect many qualified applicants. They are in the USA but have lost their status. Canada can no longer take advantage of these exceptional applicants, who are usually very skilled and experienced but may have lost their status due to some circumstances.
Consequently, this is also an obstacle to the economy growth. Gerald Clement of the Manitoba Labor and Immigration Department, and John Nychek of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, say statistics on the need for a greater influx of immigrants speak for themselves. According to Nychek, Canada welcomed over 226, 000 new immigrants in 2000 - more than in previous years - yet below the one per cent of the population goal (300, 000) set by the federal government. Clement said Manitoba received 4, 584 immigrants last year - only 2. 02 per cent of the national total. Seventy-six per cent of Manitoba's new immigrants make their home in Winnipeg. The province's top source country for immigrants is the Philippines, followed respectively by Germany, India and China. 7 The trend of increasing immigration size always identified Canada as the country which is looking towards development and globalization.
It has to keep going in the same direction. Consequently, the whole economy of Canada may suffer from the decision. I am not the only one who has this opinion. Winter of 2002 showed the view of the citizens of Canada. But, instead, we all know what happened. Liberals increase immigration, opposite to the public opinion.
Is it the bureaucratic system to blame? They are struggle to cope with huge piles of application forms does not justify their actions. But, now, it seams like they turn to be in a very suitable situation. It is hard to estimate the economic indicators now, but the consequences are found to be frightening. The cutbacks in staffing at the immigration department leaves small hope for the prompt decision change. One of the most influential people of the immigration policy leading, minister Denis Coderre, was called for public hearings on new immigration regulations.
But it looked like he totally ignored the opinion. There must be mutual understanding between public and the government to reach the mutual goals. These goals must provide all possible means for further economy growth. In the paper, we examined the economic goals of current immigration policy in Canada and the forces that influence the policy. We took a brave step in discussing possible economic consequences, having compared Canadas economy with the one of the United States. We also looked at the role immigration plays in overall economy.
We went further to see the importance of immigrants throughout the decades. We then described current economical and immigration situation. Finally, we concluded that: Canadian identity as a strong economic country is shaped by some factors including past and present immigration policies. Canadas immigration policies have reflected beliefs held by the population within decades. These beliefs give rise to certain values which appear to be very important not only culturally for Canadians, but also economically. It is the way the country has always lived and developed.
Canada cannot live without new labor force, who brought essential input into building of the greatest countries in the whole world. Immigration stays a vital part to Canada's growing economy. Bibliography: Bradly R. Schiller.
The Economy Today. New York: Library of Congress Publication, 1976. Gregory, M. I.
The World of Canada. New York: The Young Masters Press, 1982. Immigrant MPs Blast New Rules - Most immigrant MPs wouldnt get in: Hill Times Survey, The Hill Times, February 4 / 2002. New Frames, The Toronto Star, June 17 / 2002.
Scott Rosenberg. Canada, Economic Review. New York: Cooper Square Publishers, Inc. , 1984. web web web web web
Free research essays on topics related to: canadian identity, period of time, canadas immigration, immigration policies, immigration policy
Research essay sample on Period Of Time Canadas Immigration
