Example research essay topic: Scene Of The Crime One Of The Girls - 1,116 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

... extreme pressure by the police. Shortly after the trial Cadrain was admitted to a mental hospital. One can then conclude that he was in no capacity to testified and any of part of his testimony could not be taken very serious. Thus one can see that this part of the crowns case is worthless and cannot possibly lead to anyone believing that Mr.

Milgaard was guilty. The other part which contributed to the conviction of Milgaard was the forensic evidence found on the scene of the crime. This involved two yellow clumps found, which were believed to be semen. The semen supposedly contained type A antigens which only a type A blood person would have. Ironically Milgaard had type A blood.

However, there most be millions of people with type A blood, therefore to narrow it down to Milgaard is impossible. In addition these antigens are only found in blood. Blood which in this case could only be found in the secrete which accompanies the semen. However it was found that Mr. Milgaard is a none-secreted. Thus connecting the accused with this is not only impossible but ridiculous.

Furthermore tests run by Dr. Peter Markesteyn proved that the frozen yellow clump could not have been the semen of Milgaard or anyone in that case. He came to that conclusion because he himself froze semen. He then drooped some in the snow and concluded that the semen stays white and does not turn yellow. Thus, this clump could not have been semen. For all we know it cold have been dogs urine.

Since this test have been taken new DNA studies have proved that the sperm found on the victim was not that A further evidence presented by the crown was that of re-enactment. The crown had two eye witnesses that testified that Milgaard had shown them how he had accomplished the crime at a party and admitted to the crime. However it is very particular that the individuals were both facing criminal charges at the time. Perhaps they were pressure to say this in returned of a lighter sentenced.

Either way it has been discovered that one of the girls had provided the police with a statement in which she argued and disagreed with that version of the story. Also Ms. Hall, one of the girls which testified against him later submitted a sworn evidence to the Department of justice in which she clearly states that all that was spoken at the trial by her had been a lied. From this evidence one can then conclude that Mr.

Milgaard was wrongly accused and that he is innocent in every aspect of the word. Nonetheless there are more pieces of this puzzle which without a doubt prove his freedom from guilt. For instance take the time of the crime. It is believed that Gail Miller left her house at 7: 00 am. At the same time on the outskirts of town Milgaard and his friends were asking the manager for directions.

It was also at this time that the caretaker claimed to have seen the car in the alley way. Thus it could have not been the car in which Milgaard was traveling. Furthermore, it was a half an hour later, that they became stuck behind Mr. Danchuks car.

Both cars became stuck and the group was forced to wait for a tow truck for an hour in the Danchuks house. This would have made the time around 8: 30 am. They reached their friends house around 9: 00 am. The body was supposedly found at 8: 30 am. Thus unless Mr. Milgaard has ability to be two places at the same time.

He could not have been present at the time of the accident. As stated before the group of friends spent the day waiting for their car to be fixed. Hence, if Milgaard had committed the crime he would have wanted to leave the town as soon as possible. However, this was not the case. He also did not have money. If he would have committed the crime then he would have had some money since the pursed of the victim was found empty.

There is no doubt then, that Mr. Milgaard was In fact through the defense long investigation, the true culprit of this case was found. Mr. Fisher was charged with this crime after a DNA test prove that he had been present at the scene of the crime. It was also found that the accused lived in the basement of the Cadrain home, with his wife. It was also found that he had been responsible for other sexual assaults in the area, during and after the death of Gail Miller.

This explains why the purse contents were scattered and led a trail to the Cadrain house. Based on this evidence, it is possible to conclude that this case was treated with unprofessional, corruption, and laziness. The police had the responsibility to find the culprit of this crime. If they would have had the initiative to actually look into the case, they could have avoided the pain and suffering that the other women had to go through.

Thanks to them women were robbed of their human rights, society as a whole was put in danger and an innocent man was placed in jail. However, the police chose to pick on a poor teenager, who had no way to defend himself. They through at him false witnesses and evidence all which ended in his conviction. Instead of having put so much effort into falsely accusing someone, they should have used that effort to find the real criminal. After the efforts of a loving mother for decades and a complete investigation by Mr. Aspen, Mr.

Milgaard was finally released and cleared of all charges. He is now married and since has received money form the government reaching an estimated amount of $ 10 million dollars to accommodate any stress caused by his years in jail. Although this case had a blissful ending, what about all those others who have been convicted wrongly every year by the justice system. How are we then to trust the courts? The courts are there to protect our human rights, however, cases like the Milgaard one put our trust in the Justice System to question. The courts need to reconstruct themselves.

Situations like this ones should not accrued even by mistake. Specially situations in which the police are just too preoccupied with other things to treat cases with the priority they are invited to. Hence, in order to receive the treatment that we need, we ourselves need to protect ourselves. If we dont who will? the Justice Bibliography: none

Research essay sample on Scene Of The Crime One Of The Girls