NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
What Were the Causes of the Lebanese Civil War in 1975? Introduction Many political scientists regard the region of Middle East as worlds stability weak underbelly, just like Balkans. There are many factors that play role in it. The most important one, in my opinion, is peoples biological predisposition towards indulging in bloody bacchanalia's, where notion of democracy can only serve as propaganda tool. It appears that numerous conflicts in this region have the potential of growing into something bigger, since more worlds powers are becoming involved in it as well. There is no doubt, for anyone familiar with the principles of international relations, that democratic rhetoric, on the part on U.
S. , have nothing to do with accomplishing our countrys real political goals in this region. From very beginning, American governments goal was to insure control over the large portion of Iraq's oil reserves. But somewhere along the way, Americans started to believe in their own propaganda, which prompted them to sacrifice the lives of American soldiers, only so that Iraqis could have a democratic elections. Instead of claiming Iraq as occupied country and exploiting its natural resources, American government wants to withdraw from this region as soon as Iraqis prove their allegiance to the principles of democracy. Such policy cannot be effective, because it angers the whole Arabic world at USA, without bringing our country any particular dividends. The same applies to the situation in Lebanon.
The only reason why there is still so much of political unrest in this country is because both Syria and Israel want to insure their geopolitical priorities there, at the same time. Although, United States claim itself as being a neutral party, who simply strives to help in establishing a long-lasting peace in this region, there is doubt for everyone that American government is simply lobbying Israeli interests, causing many Lebanese, as well as majority of Arabs, to hate our country. Let us analyze briefly the provided articles that have to do with the conflicts in the Middle East, so wed be able to see whether there is a similarity can be found in all of them. (1) The article The Iraqi Elections: The Process gives us a general view of political processes in this country, which influenced the outcome of elections in Iraq on January 30, 2005. After having interviewed a few participants, authors try to conclude whether democratic government can be established in this country, at last. Many of those people that were being questioned, came to vote from abroad. Therefore, the value of their opinions about whats going on in Iraq appears to be very doubtful.
For example, G hassan al-Atiyyah refers to King Faisals government, which existed in Iraq up until 1954, as truly democratic. This is very far from true. As a matter of fact, this government was nothing but another form of dictatorship, although being backed up by U. S. Authors rightfully suggest that it is highly improbable that the ideals of democracy can be achieved under the barrels of guns. They point out to the fact that there can hardly be any warm feelings towards Americans, on the part of Iraqi people, since for many of them democracy means simple reduction of their mode of existence to pure physical survival, while under Saddam Hussein they enjoyed numerous social benefits, such as rights for free education and Medicare.
Basically, Americans deployed the same strategy for introducing the principles of democracy in this country, as the one that has been used in Afghanistan earlier. People are being bombed into the Stone Age, and then American planes drop the food parcels for the survivors and expect them to be grateful But instead, many locals load their vehicles with explosives and drive into whatever they associate with occupation of their country. Gustav Le Bon once said that it is not the government that defines peoples quality, but other way around. Iraqis, just like any other ethnic groups that simply are not capable of comprehending the principles of democracy, can name their government whatever they want: monarchy, democracy, peoples republic but the principle of such government will still remain the same a dictatorship. (2) Edward Norton's article Kurds Press Role as Deal Makers is about the role that Kurds played in Iraqis recent elections. In it, author also tries to analyze what are we likely to expect from them in the future. Norton indicates the fact that Kurds political influence has grown tremendously since the time of the Gulf War.
From being a persecuted ethnic minority in Saddam's Iraq, these people have now found themselves in position to be able to form the second largest political block in Iraqis new parliament. From now on, there no political decision can be made, without Kurds supporting it. Author naively thinks that Kurds political agenda is now being fully satisfied and they wont indulge in anything else, but peacefully pursuing the ideals of democracy with Shiites, whom they hate with passion. As the matter of fact, Kurds have never considered Iraq as their country; they strive for nothing less but gaining full political independence. This will inevitably turn Kurds from American allies to enemies, since their desire to have their own country will directly endanger Turkeys national interests, which is a member of NATO. The problem here lies in the fact that world powers want to maintain status quo in international politics, while proclaiming that every nation on Earth has the right to strive for independence.
These two principles contradict each other, on one hand UN wants contemporary international borders to stay intact on the other, it practices the policy of direct involvement in internal affairs of independent countries, like it happened in Yugoslavia in 1998. Kurds are very likely to become associated with international terrorism in the future, like Chechens, since it appears that will never be able to acquire political independence legally. In my opinion, America is going to get another major headache, by supporting Kurds. (4) The article Assassination in Beirut analyses the possible political links to the recent assassination of Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Author clearly tries to relate it to Syrian military presence in Lebanon, since it is rumored that late Prime Minister was against such presence.
This approach is very naive. There is an ancient principle that needs to be applied every time, while dealing with political issues we need ask ourselves, who is interested? Syria could never be interested in assassination of Hariri, because it would automatically result in political pressure on Syrian government to withdraw its troops from Lebanon. This is exactly what is happening now.
Syria is on the brink of being proclaimed the supporter of international terrorism, while the only country that openly practices international terrorism Israel, stays in the shade. I personally have no doubt that Israel is behind this assassination. We constantly hear that there are Syrian troops in Lebanon and this intolerable, but the same applies to Israeli military, that are present in so-called safety zone, which is a part of Lebanese territory. How come there are no bleeding hearts throughout the world because of that? Syrian military presence in Lebanon is nothing but a counter-measure to prevent Israel from practicing genocidal practices against Palestinians in this country. It is not Syria but Israel, which is known to have perpetrated the covered-up acts of terrorism, like an attack on USS Liberty in 1967, which was disguised as Egyptian attack and was meant to get America involved in war against Egypt.
Still, even without Israeli and Syrian involvement, is appears to be very problematic that the political stability could ever be established in Lebanon. It is not only that its population divided on ethical groups that want to eliminate each other, but also there is a religious division, on top of that. This creates dangerous mix, which very often causes in explosions, in the literal sense of this word
Free research essays on topics related to: prime minister, military presence, political independence, matter of fact, international terrorism
Research essay sample on Matter Of Fact Prime Minister
