NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Today we try to discuss and compare two articles which concerning multiculturalism and affirmative action on a college campuses. The term multiculturalism" faced with both an historical and a conceptual perspective. This term came into wide public use during the early 1980 s in the context of public school curriculum reform. The argument was made that the content of classes in history, literature, social studies, and other areas reflected what came to be called a "Eurocentric" bias. Few if any women or people of color, or people from outside the Western European tradition, appeared prominently in the curriculums of schools in the United States. Now we have a lot of different statements and facts based on multiculturalism.
For people, who lived in other country before its something like push for action for making best education and make best results in future work. Illiberal Education "documents how the politics of race and gender in our universities are rapidly eating away traditions of scholarship and reward for individual achievement" (Robert H. Bork). In nowadays, we can clearly marked, that American society in recent years has been shocked and embarrassed to discover ugly incidents of racism against blacks. The article Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex On Campus by Dinesh D'Souza, shows how Political Correctness produces closed-mindedness and intolerance, which is to say an "illiberal education. " The author explains how Political Correctness opposes the teaching of Western Civilization. It advocates demand that professors give prime attention to race and gender issues, and abolish the classics of Western civilization.
Mr. D'Souza notes that even if they are personally supportive of the stated goals of affirmative action, "it offends against their sense of justice, and it is of little solace to tell them that they must subordinate their individual rights to the greater goods of group equality and proportional representation. " For students psychology it is very important to realised that everybody -American, Hispanic or Russian students are equal. So, the other author Cornel West in his work Diverse New World prove that Ethnic diversity is clearly the purpose of affirmative action, which Young is defending against a long-overdue assault. But far from being essential to a college education, such diversity is a sure road to its destruction. Ethnic diversity is merely racism in a politically correct disguise.
The only way to eradicate racism on campus is to make racist programs and the philosophic ideas that feed racism. It will become an ugly memory only when universities teach a valid concept of human nature: one based on the tenets that the individuals mind is competent, that the human intellect is efficacious, that we possess free will, that individuals are to be judged as individuals and that deriving ones identity from ones race is a corruption a corruption appropriate to Nazi Germany, not to a nation based on freedom and independence. Many people have a very superficial view of racism. They see it as merely the belief that one race is superior to another. It is much more than that. It is a fundamental (and fundamentally wrong) view of human nature.
Racism is the notion that ones race determines ones identity. It is the belief that ones convictions, values and character are determined not by the judgment of ones mind but by ones anatomy or blood. In literature and the arts we tend to get the messy complexities in all their detail, rather than the abstract rigidities we get from theorists, polemicists, and statisticians. This view causes people to be condemned (or praised) based on their racial membership.
In turn, it leads them to condemn or praise others on the same basis. In fact, one can gain an authentic sense of pride only from ones own achievements, not from inherited characteristics. A former White House domestic-policy analyst and now a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, D'Souza surveys the politics of racial quotas at Berkeley, the bogusness of "multiculturalism" at Stanford, racial incidents and censorship at the University of Michigan, the subversion of academic standards at Duke, and the politics of gender and race at Howard and Harvard. He argues persuasively that each case reflects the transformation of the "intellectual and moral infrastructure of the American university, " a shift that has affected who is admitted to college, what students are taught, and what they are permitted to say and believe. Echoing Shelby Steele, D'Souza characterizes this academic upheaval as "the victims' revolution" on campus, a revolution "conducted in the name of those who suffer from the effects of Western colonialism in the Third World, as well as race and gender discrimination in America...
Since the revolutionaries view xenophobia, racism, sexism, and other prejudices to be endemic and culturally sanctioned, their project seeks a fundamental restructuring of American society. It involves basic changes in the way economic rewards are distributed, in the way cultural and political power are exercised, and also in privately held and expressed opinions. "The American university is the birthplace and testing ground for this enterprise of social transformation. " This insight is critical, because it recognizes that many of the current fads of the academy -- from Lacanian and reader-response criticism, to deconstructionism -- are ultimately only tactical in their significance and therefore easily replaceable. As bizarre and troubling as these nihilistic doctrines may seem, they too shall pass sooner or later. But their real importance lies in the political agenda they conceal, a program which they have advanced with notable and, indeed, remarkable success to date. Again, the victims of this ideological agenda are the students. As D'Souza puts it: students are not only deprived of full exposure to the Western tradition, but they do not even get a genuine and comprehensive understanding of non-Western cultures.
Their curricular diet now consists of little more than crude Western political slogans masquerading as the vanguard of Third World thought. Not only does the new multiculturalism deprive students of an opportunity for learning about themselves and others, but it distorts other cultures and peoples and makes future global understanding more difficult. For conclude todays review lets reminded some worlds of Dudley-Grant "If we can't change a person's internal understanding of people with difference backgrounds and if we can't change someone's innate attitude toward other groups, there will always be a division and difficulty in gainful parity or equality, not only of opportunity, but interaction as well. "
Free research essays on topics related to: race and gender, affirmative action, political correctness, ethnic diversity, western civilization
Research essay sample on Race And Gender Ethnic Diversity
