Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Death Penalty Drug Addiction - 2,406 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

PROPOSAL ON DRUG ABUSE PROGRAMS Introduction Drug addiction is considered as a gnawing problem because of its persistent negative effects not just to individuals but also to society. This paper looks at this problem exhaustively and proposes solutions as to how this can be remedied. There are different approaches that have been explored with regard to this matter. Tougher measures are encouraged here.

However, death penalty for drug-related gang killings simply would not work too well in the long run. At an opening hearing, drug-control experts express their policy strategies. One group favors putting money into hiring new law enforcement agents who will patrol borders, target large dealers and make drug raids here and abroad. They also call for such "get-tough" measures as the mandatory waiver of drug dealers to the adult court system, strict punishment for drug possession and sale and the death penalty for drug-related gang killings.

In fact, executions may even increase the murder rates rather than deter crime. Criminals are more afraid of the idea of being imprisoned his entire life, with no chances of getting out rather than the death penalty. The accused and the criminals view life imprisonment as robbing and controlling their lives, which is hard for them to accept. Death penalty could be their easy way out of the miserable situation they may live in inside the prison bars. Crime rates even shoot up in the event of executions because it makes criminals angrier and more vengeful of the society. They see a life sentence without parole as more tolerable than death penalty.

Crime deterrence can possibly be effective more through a crime prevention program rather than sentencing a criminal to face the death row. More of the criminal justice money actually goes to the murder trials, appeals and death row convictions. Research indicates executions are three to six times more costly than life imprisonment. According to a study by the New York State Defense Association, the cost of executing someone is actually, on the average, more than three times as high as keeping that person in prison for life. The higher cost is partly the result of the numerous appeals and other safeguards required to insure that an innocent person is not put to death, as well as the added costs of security on death rows and the cost of the execution itself. (Hintze, 4) The Gallup Poll in May 2004 found that a growing number of Americans support a sentence of life without parole rather than the death penalty for those convicted of murder. Gallup found that 46 % of respondents favor life imprisonment over the death penalty, up from 44 % in May 2003.

During that same time frame, support for capital punishment as an alternative fell from 53 % to 50 %. (DPIC). Death penalty for these criminals suggests that Capital punishment lowers the value of human life because it is associated with the notion of revenge. Death penalty robs the sacredness of human life. It also abuses the society in a way that it forces the society to accept the premeditated murder the government disguises in the death penalty law. It sends a message that killing is the way to solve a problem. As a result, the society slowly accepts the view that killing and violence is not at all shocking.

It actually violates our belief in the concept of hope and change, that humans have the capacity to learn and change. Now can it be said that the death penalty should not be abolished? A second group believes that the best way to deal with drugs is to spend money on community treatment, expanding the number of beds in drug detoxification clinics and funding research on how to reduce drug dependency clinically. The use of a community treatment centers can be a big help but not over the long haul. There will be an increase of more people like these and the state shall be spending more and more money unnecessarily. There will be more and more number of beds that will be crowded and will then have another set of problems.

In Dr. Patrick Dixons book, The Truth about Drugs he states that addiction is a significant threat to civilization. According to Science World, scientists have found that drug addiction is a brain disease in which drugs of abuse change the way the brain functions (Anonymous). This characterization of drug abuse agrees to the factors that increase the likelihood that a person would be addicted to drugs (MFMER).

According to MFMER, these so-called risk factors are personality; social environment; anxiety, depression and loneliness; genetics; and type of drug. Some of the reasons cited by Dixon on why this happens is because drugs have a relatively low price and is easily accessible (MFMER). A third group argues that neither punishment nor treatment can restrict teenage drug use and that the best course is to educate at-risk kids about the dangers of substance abuse and to legalize all drugs but control their distribution. This would, they argue, help reduce crime and violence among drug users and help balance the national debt by heavily taxing narcotics. The best way to approach this problem is still to educate the at-risk adolescents on the dangers of substance abuse.

This group maintains that it would be a difficult task to punish or restrict teenage drug use so that it may be even effective just to teach and educate the at-risk kids. Society is not, and could never be a collection of autonomous individuals. We all have a stake in ensuring that each of us displays a minimal level of dignity, responsibility and empathy. We cannot, of course, coerce people into goodness, but we can and should insist that some standards must be met by society itself on which the very existence of the human personality depends. For instance, the fact that these drugs are easily accessible already poses a great threat to society. This can lead a society to be numb and desensitized such that they can ignore it altogether.

Cited as one of the most common effects of drug addiction involves the change in the behavior of an individual (MFMER). This encompasses the whole gamut of the effects of the drug addiction because these changes in the behavior of a drug addict can be considered the root of all the effects of drug addiction. Thus, a constant vigilance and education efforts on drugs will be helpful in the long run. There are no scientific grounds for predicting who will and who will not become dependent on drugs. Neither socioeconomic background nor personality traits differentiate between causal and intensive users.

Thus, the only way to settle the question of who is correct about the effect of easy availability on drug use is to try it and see. But the social experiment is so risky as to be no experiment at all. For if drugs is legalized and if the rate of its abusive use increases dramatically, there is no way to put the genie back in the bottle, and it is not a kindly genie at all. All the many efforts to contain it by concerned individuals will be plunge back to zero. Changes in behavior affect not just the individual hooked up to drugs but the whole society where he or she belongs. This means that complications in his / her relationship with other people may arise such that it contributes to the disintegration of a well-established society where things are in order.

MFMER enumerated the areas where complication may arise because of changes in behavior affecting the whole society, not just the drug addict or his family. Negative effects of changes to behavior extend to the whole society and this poses a big problem to the perpetuation of a society living in peace and order. These range from family to work to the society at large (MFMER). This is one of the more blatant and recognizable abuse that is happening all over the country. This particular dilemma might be as trivial as teenagers smoking pot during late-night parties or it might be as encompassing as people running a drug syndicate within a town. Whatever the situation is, drug abuse is where one can find some of the most likely cases for recidivism.

The advocates of legalization will respond by suggesting that this picture is overdrawn. Ethan Nadelmann of Princeton argues that the risk of legalization is less than most people suppose. Over twenty million Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five have tried methamphetamine (according to a government survey), but only a quarter million use it daily. From this Nadelmann concludes that at most 3 percent of all young people who try this develop a problem with it. The implication is clear: Make the drug legal and we only have to worry about 3 percent of our youth (Teens, Drug Abuse, and Aids: The Deadly Connection). The single most difficult hurdle the counselor must overcome with the drug user is his or her impaired judgment and defenses (evasions, denials, and rationalizations that often amount to outright delusions).

For this reason, the users history must be taken skillfully in a nonjudgmental manner with a focus on specific, objective information. The aim must be to discover whether or not the client is in control of his or her drug-related behavior. The position taken here must be that use of the drugs must be viewed holistically as a psychosomatic social disease with interpersonal components which could be severe enough to result in death. Eradication of the motive to use drugs is not as easily accomplished as the detoxification process which cures the addict of physical dependency.

Patterns of behavior involving defenses and coping mechanisms that have been well incorporated into a personality structure cannot be easily altered except possibly to the very young, or to the highly motivated ones. Linkage to a support system which can provide an alternative lifestyle to the prevalent middle-class lifestyle that involves drug use is valuable in maintaining sobriety. Perhaps, the person can be given a healthier outlook on her problem of obesity (if that is the reason why she takes it) by other people who have been on the same drug use and who are now leaner and healthier because of natural means. This will give the user the motivation to persist in achieving her weight goal without the use of any drugs like methamphetamine (Dixon, 1998).

Recommendation to the President With the amount of money that was given to me, I will come up with a balance program between being firm and being gentle with these people. The first step must be to identify those who have toxic amounts of drugs in their body. These individuals would be the first priority of the program on drug prevention. They will be housed in a community center geared towards rehabilitation.

The aim is to shift the client from a wish for immediate magical transformation to instrumental behaviors. The client must be helped to gain control over his or her life space as a means to achieving genuine power. Addictive persons tend to resist working toward long-term goals which involve postponement of gratification and the exercise of self-discipline. It may be necessary to set short-term, easily achievable goals at first.

There must be need to teach clients to give themselves strokes when they achieve small successes. They will tend to look to the counselor for approval and he may be tempted to oblige (Ubell, 1973). Another step will be to set up counseling sessions to young abusers. Helping male clients to establish non-exploitative relationships with women with whom they have tended to fear will sometimes emerge as important aspect of counseling.

For perfectionistic female clients, the problem is that they tend to keep a distance out of fear that self-revelation may lead to criticism and rejection. Counseling will seek to help males to depolarize their views of women, and women to be more open and assertive with respect to their feelings. Consciousness-raising and assertiveness training will be important aspects of the counseling in solving the problem (Ubell, 1973). Persons who use drugs to alter reality have in common their dissatisfaction with reality as they experience it. They frequently feel hopeless in the face of their daily lives. In instances of drug abuse, feelings of powerlessness are common.

The effects vary widely and make it difficult to generalize about the concerns particular individuals may be seeking to overcome. With persons who abuse drugs, counseling is indicated. Resolution of personal feelings of inadequacy will remove the need to alter reality with a fix. Nevertheless, the physiological response of some individuals to drugs, once habituated is so compelling that counseling alone is insufficient (Ubell, 1973). The social inequalities endured by the youths handed down from generation to generation need to be looked into by the government.

The youths with low self-esteem are more likely to drop out from school and eventually indulge in violent behaviors and drug abuse than those who are well motivated to stay in school and recognize a bright future ahead. Striving for a better solution to the problems of leaving school will resolve the problems of students who resort to gangs and drug selling. The best effort will be the education of these youth so that they are aware from the start about the dangerous effects of drug use both to them and to society in general. Thus, rehabilitation programs will also have programs to strengthen family structure so that it creates a positive environment for the educational motivation and support for their kids. Parents who generate a sense of security in the family will help resolve the social insecurities, which will help these youths handle conflicts and frustrations that will keep them away from violent behaviors. Works Cited Answers.

com. July 17, 2008 at: web Death Penalty Information Center. 2005. July 17, 2008 < web >. Dixon, Patrick. The Truth About Drugs: Facing the Big Issue of the New Millennium. Hodder: 1998.

July 17, 2008 at < web >. Hintze, M. Death Penalty: Ineffective and Unfair. The Daily. University of Washington. 98. 24 (1990): 4. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

Drug Addiction. 06 January 2004. July 17, 2008 < web >. Teens, Drug Abuse, and Aids: The Deadly Connection. Science World. 61. 11 (2005): Ubell, Earl. How to Save your Life Harcourt Brace Jovanovic h, Inc. New York. 1973.


Free research essays on topics related to: drug abuse, drug addiction, death penalty, easily accessible, substance abuse

Research essay sample on Death Penalty Drug Addiction

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com