NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... citizens. According to rapid immigration. com, The U. S.
government has forecast a shortage of 20 million workers by 2026, prompting many parties to call for a relaxation of the US immigration laws in order to meet the labor demand. (Immigration facts) verbal, immigration is considered t be a positive thing fr the U. S. budget: it brings a net fiscal positive, which means that the taxes immigrants pay g are the cst's f the services they receive. We might say, therefore, that educated and skilled immigrants are likely t be strong contributors t federal budget. n the ther hand, immigrants with nne r lw education levels will mst likely t be a fiscal burden fr ther taxpayers. Mst immigrants are less educated than the native-brn Americans.
As Passel writes: ne-quarter f legal adult immigrants lack a high schl degree, compare t 9 percent and the native-brn population. However, there is a well educated sub-grup within the legal immigrant population. Sme 32 percent f legal immigrant adults have a college degree, compare t 30 percent f native-brn adults. (Passel, 2005, p. 6) The education levels f illegal immigrants are significantly lower than the f legal immigrants. And fifty percent f all adult illegal aliens d nt press a high schl degree (Ibid). And Latin American and Mexican immigrants, 60 percent lack a high schl degree and nly 7 percent have a high schl diploma. By contrast, and native-brn wrker's in the U.
S. , nly 6 percent have failed t complete high schl degrees and nearly a third have a college degree (Samuel, 2006, p. A 21). It is a can knowledge that illegal immigrants receive lw wages. Fr example, in the year 2000, the average weekly earnings f a Mexican illegal immigrant were $ 323, which is nly abut a half f what ther legal nn-Hispanic whites in that earned (Fry and Lowell, 2002). Usually, the average wages f fresh immigrants rise after entry as they gain experience in the U. S.
last market. Fr example, immigrants wh arrived in the U. S. in the 60 s and 70 s experienced 10 % relative wage compare t ther immigrants wages during their first 20 years in the country.
However, immigrants wh arrived in the late 1980 s actually had lower wages in the 1990 s. (Break, 1999, p. 30) According t the Pew Hispanic Center, 4. 7 million children f illegal immigrant parents currently live in the U. S. (Passel, 2005, p. 20) And 37 percent f these children live in party. (Ibid) While children f illegal immigrants constitute and 6 % f all children in the U. S. , they are 11. 8 % f all pr American children. (Ibid) This high level f party and illegal immigrant children is explained by the lw education levels and lw wages f their parents. The ther read fr their party is the reducing amount f marriages and Hispanics in the U.
S, which causes and 45 % f children t be brn ut f marriage. (Martin, 2005, p. 49) Als, the birth rate fr Hispanic teens is higher than fr black teens. (Ibid, p. 54) While the ut-f-marriage birth rate fr blacks has remained the same fr the last 10 years, it has risen sharply and the Hispanics. (Center fr National Health Statistics) These statistics is important because and 80 % f illegal aliens cme frm Mexico and Latin America. (Passel, 2005, p. 4) In general, it is considered that children brn and raised upside f wedlock are 7 times mre likely t live in party than children brn and raised by married couples. It means that these ut f wedlock are als mre likely t be n welfare, have lower educational levels, natinal problems, heavily use drugs and all, and commit crime. (Fagan et al, 2002) It is als known that native-brn adults are twice less likely t live in party than illegal immigrants. Abut 27 % f adult illegal immigrants are pr, compare t 13 percent f native-brn adults. (Passel, 2005, p. 34) Traditionally, immigrant ppulatin's basted lower crime rates in comparison with native-brn ppulatin's. Fr example, in 1991, the verbal crime rate fr nn-citizens was lower than fr native-brn citizens. Interestingly enough, imprisonment fr violent crime was half as likely fr nn-citizens than fr citizens. (National Research Counsel) And Hispanics, in contrast, the crime rate is pretty high. Age-specific imprisonment rates and Hispanics in federal and state press are tw t tw-and-a-half times higher than and nn-Hispanic whites. (Harris, Beck, 2004) It should be new that a very little share f these crimes constitute breaking f immigration laws.
Illegal immigrants in the United States are verwhelmingly Hispanic, coming frm Mexico. It is possible that in the near future Hispanic immigrants and their children may be blamed fr the high crime rates and illegal and lw-income Hispanic population in the U. S. as a we.
It als means that if amnesty is given t thousands f illegal Hispanic aliens flying t the U. S. each year, crime rate might significantly increase in the lng run. Federal and state gvernment's currently spend billin's f dollars n welfare benefits.
Illegal aliens are nt eligible fr mst f the welfare benefits, but can receive sme assistance through programs such as Medicaid. Als, American-brn children f illegal immigrant parents become US citizens and, therefore, are eligible fr all federal welfare benefits. Granting amnesty t illegal aliens would have tw posing fiscal effects. n ne hand, it may raise wages and taxes paid by expansion f the last market and increase tax conformity and tax revenues as mre wrk would be she through the bks. n the ther hand, amnesty would greatly increase amounts f receivers f welfare and ther benefits. The Center fr Immigration Studies (CIS) has performed a through study f the federal fiscal impacts f amnesty.
This study fund that illegal immigrant husehld's have lw education levels and lw wages and currently pay little in taxes. Illegal immigrant husehld's als receive lower levels f federal government benefits. Nonetheless, the study als fund that, n average, illegal immigrant families received mre in federal benefits than they paid in taxes (Camera, 2004). Granting amnesty would make illegal immigrants eligible fr federal benefit programs. The CIS study estimated the additional taxes that would be paid and the extra government cst's that would arise as a result f amnesty. It assumed that welfare use and tax payments and current illegal immigrants would rise t equal the levels and legally-admitted immigrants f similar national, educational, and demographic background.
If all illegal immigrants were granted amnesty, federal tax payments would increase by sme $ 3, 000 per household, but federal benefits and social services would increase by $ 8, 000 per household. That federal welfare benefits would reach and $ 9, 500 per household, r $ 35 billion per year that. The study estimates that the net cst t the federal government f granting amnesty t sme 3. 8 million illegal alien husehld's would be and $ 5, 000 per household, fr a that federal fiscal cst f $ 19 billion per year. (Ibid) Conclusion: Analyzing the are information we may conclude that amnesty should nt be granted t the illegal immigrants. First f all, the invasion f illegal immigrants should be speed by strong border security programs and programs that prevent employers frm employing illegal aliens. Secondly, amnesty and citizenship should nt be given t current illegal immigrants because amnesty will cause negative fiscal consequences and is bogusly unfair t the wh have waited fr years t enter the country legally. Amnesty would als attract even mre future illegal immigration.
Thirdly, all guest water programs should grant nly temporary, residence permits and should nt be a way t brain citizenship. A guest water program should nt excessively enlarge the ranks f lw-skill wrker's. Fourth, children brn t parents wh are illegal aliens should nt be given citizenship because it automatically gives access t welfare and means that parents will nt ever leave the U. S. Finally, the legal immigration system grants legitimate permanent residence t sme 950, 000 persons each year. This system should be changed t substantially increase the prprtin f new entrants with high levels f education and skills, corresponding t the current demand n the U.
S. last market. Bibliography: Williams John and Schuck Peter H. (forthcoming), "Deporting Criminal Aliens: The Pitfalls and Opportunities of Federalism", Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. Yale Law and Policy Review (1996). Solar Judith N.
American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion (Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press), (1991) Jacobson David, Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press), (1996) United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Legislation from 1981 to 1996, retrieved on Dec. 9 from: web US Immigration facts, retrieved on Nov. 6 from: web Schuck Peter H. , "Alien Rumination", Yale Law Journal, (1996) Schuck Peter H. , " The Message of 187 ", The American Prospect (Spring), (1995) Coalition for the Future American Worker: An Amnesty By Any Other Name is Still an Amnesty, , Amnesty Handout retrieved on Nov. 6 from: web Johnson Jeff, Gephardt Promises Amnesty for Illegal Aliens, CNS News. com, Thursday, Oct. 19, 2002 Jeffrey Passel, Unauthorized Migrants: Numbers and Characteristics, Pew Hispanic Center, Washington, D. C. , June 14, 2005, p. 6. Robert J. Samuelson, We Dont Need Guest Workers, Washington Post, March 22, 2006, p.
A 21. Richard Fry and B. Lindsay Lowell, Work or Study: Different Fortunes of U. S. Latino Generations, Pew Hispanic Center, Washington, D.
C. , May 28, 2002 George J. Borjas, Heavens Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy, Princeton University Press, 1999, p. 30. Joyce A. Martin, Births: Final Data for 2003, National Vital Statistics Reports, Volume 54, Number 2, National Center for Health Statistics, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, September 8, 2005, p. 49.
Center for National Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, Vital Statistics of the United States, 2001, Volume One, Natality, table 1 - 17, at web Patrick Fagan, Robert Rector, Kirk Johnson, and America Peterson, The Positive Effects of Marriage: A Book of Charts, The Heritage Foundation, Washington, D. C. , April 2002. National Research Council, The New Americans: Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Effects of Immigration, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C. 1997, p. 388. Paige M. Harrison, and Allen J.
Beck, Prisoners in 2003, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, NCJ 205335, Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. November 2004 Steven A. Camarota, The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget, Center for Immigration Studies, Washington D.
C. , August 2004.
Free research essays on topics related to: welfare benefits, illegal aliens, illegal immigrants, illegal immigration, hispanic whites
Research essay sample on Illegal Immigrants Illegal Aliens
