NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
There is also a lot of information on the Internet and in books, which can be easily reached by hunters and fishers, provided by The Division of Ecological services. Fishermans Blue Book Online gives information about the winners of the Itasca County fishing contest and contains other information for fishermen. North Shore Fishing Guide is a guide to fishing on the North Shores. Classic Bass is aimed at popularizing bass fishing in Minnesota. The Minnesota Fishing Resort Guide gives information about the best fishing resorts and outfitters in Minnesota. Therefore, there is plenty of information available for fishermen in order to assist them and in order to make their outdoor time more pleasant.
The state regulations on fishing are aimed to protect natural resources. According to the law, anyone 16 years of age or older should have a valid fishing license to fish in Minnesota. There are also licenses available for non-residents, such as individual 24 -hour license, 3 -day individual, 7 -day individual, husband and wife 14 -day, and family season licenses. Besides license, a fisherman should also have a trout and salmon stamp to fish designated trout stream, designated trout lake or Lake Superior. Licenses are available from the Minnesota department of Natural Resources and from sporting goods stores and bait shops throughout Minnesota. Also, anyone who fishes in Minnesota waters should obtain and read a current copy of the Minnesota Fishing Regulations handbook, which is available for free.
Over the last decade, there had been some court appeals, in which Chippewa Indians sued the state of Minnesota for their fishing and hunting rights. Chippewa Indians claimed that according to the 1837 treaty with the U. S. government they were allowed to hunt and fish free of state regulations on the land ceded in this treaty. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in order to avoid the lengthy court battles had suggested a negotiate settlement. The proposal would have required the band to withdraw their lawsuit and to limit the Lake Mille Lacs walleye harvest to 24, 000 pounds per year, and adhere to a band conservation code.
The state would give the band $ 8. 6 million, 7, 500 acres of land, plus exclusive fishing rights on 4. 5 % of Lake Mille Lacs. However, during 1993 Minnesota Legislature almost defeated the negotiated deal. Legislators were claiming that the use of gill nets would negatively affect the walleye population and would harm tourism. Treaty supporters insisted that use of gill nets and spear is important part of Indian culture and religion. In 1994, U.
S. District Court Judge Diana Murphy ruled that the Mille Lacs band retained the hunting, fishing, and gathering rights granted in the 1837 treaty. A second phase of the trial was ordered to determine the band's fish and game allocation and the extent of any state regulation. Phase II concluded on January 29, 1997 when District Court Judge Michael Davis ruled that the band's fishing and hunting activities in the twelve-county region were to be regulated by the band's Conservation Code, rather than by the state's fish and game rules. The state of Minnesota filed an appeal with the Eighth U.
S. Circuit Court of Appeals in March 1997. On August 26, 1997, a three-judge panel of the circuit court upheld the lower court decisions. In November 1997, the Eighth U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request to reconsider the ruling of the three-judge panel.
An appeal was filed with the U. S. Supreme Court, which heard the case on December 2, 1998. On March 24, 1999, the U.
S. Supreme Court ruled on a 5 - 4 vote that the Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa retain the hunting and fishing rights guaranteed to them under the 1837 treaty. So in such a way this situation was solved. Besides, in 1999 U. S. District Court Judge Michael Davis ordered the state of Minnesota to pay the legal expense of the Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa and six other band totaling $ 3. 95 million.
Free research essays on topics related to: natural resources, u s district court, court judge, u s supreme court, circuit court
Research essay sample on U S Supreme Court U S District Court
