Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: United States Army Physical Fitness - 986 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Matt Amos What exactly is a standard? According to Webster's dictionary, a standard is a level of quality or excellence that is accepted as the norm or by which actual attainments are judged. Standards are created because someone believes that a fair and efficient form of doing something is necessary. The military is full of these standards.

One of the most widely known is the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It tests the maximum amount of push-ups and sit-ups a person can do in two minutes. Along with completing a two-mile run in the allotted time prescribed. The APFT is different from any other standardized test I have ever seen. It is painfully obvious that the test is severely skewed in the females favor. About fifteen years ago, "a group of sports medicine experts in the Army decided that the standards for the females in the APFT were not fair" (web).

They believe that overall some parts of the body were weaker on females than in males, and that a new test could help females be equals in the military. This is despite the fact the women had been doing the APFT for years with out a problem, and no complaints were ever filed. Never the less, a physical fitness board was created in order to research a fairer standard. After several years of research, the board eventually came up with what is now the current APFT. They created a process called gender nothing. Their hope was that this would set the bar for all other gender-integrated programs in the military.

However, all the program succeeded in doing was creating weaker females and a bitter male population in the Army. The way gender nothing works is more of a theory than a proven fact. The idea is that by taking a handful of case studies done in a laboratory we can figure out every female's physical fitness level. There is only one problem with that idea.

Every human being in the world has different genetics. Meaning not every female is going to have the same body type and muscle structure as the next. To imply that females are weaker genetically than men is preposterous. Just as some women may be weaker in a certain event in the AFPT so might a male be as well. For example, I hate running with an extreme prejudice. I have never been a good runner and more than likely never will be.

Does this mean that now, because I do not run well that all males in the Army should have an easier standard? Of course not, that is crazy. The male soldiers would find that insulting and would not allow it to stand. The Army has created a double standard and the women for some reason seem to accept it. It is ironic considering how females in the army have been constantly asking for equal rights and how they only want to be considered as equals. It was not until three years had passed since the creation of the new female standard, that women started to complain about unfair standards.

All of a sudden the board was receiving letters on the how the Army's basic training standards were to hard for females. Thus the formation of a new basic training establishment for females and noncombatant MOS (military occupational specialty) was created in order to create a "less gender prejudiced basic training and general training atmosphere" (Athletic Medicine # 2). Now a days it is commonplace to hear about a formal complaint is being filed against the Army, saying that something is gender biased. Women claim that because they do not have the same amount of upper body strength, they should have to do fewer push-ups.

They also claim that their legs are not as strong as their male counter parts so they need a slower run time. I could agree that some women are not as strong as males and that maybe an easier standard could help make things fairer. That is however, if the Army does not have a physical training program in place. Unfortunately for the female protestors, the Army does not have one in place, and there is no reason not to be in good enough shape to meet the basic requirements for all sexes. I am not here to try to put down female soldiers. That would be pointless and select for me to do.

What I am trying to show is how two sets of standards can create animosity among a group of individuals in which a certain amount of cohesion must be maintained in order be proficient in their jobs. The fact that a group of people is thinking something is unfair and biased is enough to change major policy in the Army is scary. There is far too much fear of being put on CNN as a" female hater" so being extremely careful when it comes to creating policy is important. It is hard enough to keep a group as large and diverse as the Army together without adding to the fire by creating double standards. However, there are studies being done researching new ways to physical fitness without creating a double standard. I believe this is the only way to truly integrate females into the army.

Works Cited United States Army. Department of Athletic Medicine. "The APFT and the Army. " 06 NOV 2003 United States Army. Department of Health and Research. "Researcher find a new APFT may not be all they hoped for. " 22 OCT 2002. 06 NOV 2003 < web > Outline (Final) Matt Amos Thesis Statement: The United States Army sets high standards for physical fitness the are biased toward women. I. Introduction II.

Army APFT standards for men/ women III. Why they say women need different standards IV. Why they say its not fair V. How a new PT test could make things better VI.

Conclusion


Free research essays on topics related to: make things, basic training, physical fitness, double standard, united states army

Research essay sample on United States Army Physical Fitness

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com