NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... d trust their partner rely on them to care and help them with their needs. Holmes and Rempel stated that trust in an intimate relationship go through three different stages; the partners observe one another's actions, dependability- after watching their partner they decide whether or not they can depend on this person, and the last stage is faith- people being to feel secure about their relationship and start to wonder where it is headed. When people develop trust through a self perception process can also be caused by situational variables. When someone has an increased objective self awareness, it affects the self perception process in two ways. The first way is when someone has an increased level of self awareness which is brought on by high levels of attitude behavior consistency.
The second way self perception is affected is when an individual who is being objective and aware of themselves, see themselves the way that other people see them. Not only can self awareness affect the way people see their intimate relationship, but also a person's individual differences affects the development of trust. Individuals, who concentrate on their partner's needs, and not on the sharing of needs and exchanges in the relationship, are happy with themselves and their behaviors. People who got communally oriented do not have to worry about trust to make sure that their partner's answer to their trusting behaviors.
Communally oriented people do look at their partner's behaviors and they do so to figure out if their partner's behaviors will give them some information. People who get a high score on the communal orientation care more about their partner's needs and did not care whether or not their partners were concerned about their needs. Even if self perception theory says that a person's own behaviors cause internalized attitude change, it also known that the way an individual's behaviors may lead to a difference in publicly reported beliefs only. Article 2: Methods This experiment included students from the United States who are in a heterosexual relationship. The design of this experiment included 2 males and females subjects, 2 (relationship orientation: high/ low exchange), 2 (actor/ recipient), 4 (type of behaviors: trusting with mirror, trusting with no mirror, trusting and anonymity with no mirror, and irrelevant with no mirror).
The people who take part of this research are first put through an orientation which determines how different the individuals are out side of the relationship in a community like setting. The subjects are then randomly chosen and put into 2 groups. The 1 st group was exposed to trusting or irrelevant behaviors with or without a mirror. The 2 nd group was taught with or with out a mirror, that their partners had shown trusting or irrelevant behaviors.
Each person from each couple was exposed to the same condition. After being exposed to the same condition, the subjects who were part of the study then took measurements of trust. Participants 64 students who attend psychology, human development, and human sexuality classes at the University of Maine volunteers to participate in this study. When these students volunteered they were told that this study was about relationships and their partners needed to a part of it, even if they did not attend the University of Maine. There were 128 people in the research. Their ages varied from 18 to 47 years old.
These couples had been in a relationship with one another between 1 to 96 months. 96 % of the participants in this study were Caucasian. Measure Personality inventories were completed by the subjects as a group. After the inventories, the couple signed up to come back for another session. The "Relationship Orientation Scale" by Zak and Gold was one of the tests which were given during this study.
Another test given was the Murstein, Wadlin and Bond's Exchange Orientation Scale which shows what kind of exchange or non exchange behaviors happen within a couple. The participants gave their responses to the Relationship Orientation Scale using a 19 point scale, with one being the strongly disagree, and 19 to be strongly agreeing. An example of one of the question on the scale was, "I usually remember if I owe my partner a favor, or if he / she owes me a favor. " This is an example of an exchange. Procedure The couples then returned for their second sessions. When they returned they met with both a female and male researcher. The researchers then went on with the study, but first they had to separate the males and the females.
After each couple had been split up by gender, they were brought into laboratory rooms by researchers of the same gender. Actors in the trusting behavior conditions followed the following information that was given to them by the researchers. (See attached next page. ) The conductors of the research waited for the subjects and how they felt about the information given. The results were all similar, no one allowed their significant other to dance with someone they did not know. The researchers then left the room and told the subjects that there were going to inform their significant other of their response.
Recipients in trusting behavior conditions. The subjects in this group were given the same information as the previous group, only this time the roles were switched around. In this group, the partners had been asked if they would let they present person who is participating dance with the stranger. The researchers then left them in the room for a little bit. The researchers then returned and told the subjects that their significant other did not care of the participants danced, even though they never did ask their significant partners. The partners who were still in the separate room were then asked to finish the dependent measures.
The trust scale and the Dyadic trust scale. Trusting behavior and anonymity condition. The way this experiment was set up was the same way as it was for the actors and the recipients. The only thin they added was some instructions before the dependent measures were completed. (See attached page for instructions given. ) Actors and recipients in the irrelevant behavior condition.
The procedure for these groups was identical to the group of actors and recipients who were dealing with trusting behaviors. The only difference was that the researchers told this group of participants that information was needed from one member of the couple who listened and then danced with another member of the opposite gender. Self-awareness manipulation. The actors and recipients got an increased amount of self awareness which included another trusting behavior situation which included a mirror. The subjects sat in a room with boxes and folders in front of a big mirror and let each other know that they conductor of the experiment left their supplies in that specific lab room.
The experiment without a mirror was the same as the experiment which had a mirror, except for the fact that the mirror had been turned so that the only thing showing was they back. The subjects were told in this situation that another conductor of the research had left his supplies in that lab room. Dependent measures. Rempel, Holmes and Zanna's (1985) 17 -item Trust State was first completed by all of the people participating in the research. The 7 -point scale was changed to a 19 -point scale, where (1) is the strongly disagree, (10) is neutral, and (19) is strongly agree. The scale had been changed to give an opportunity for high variance in the results.
After this Trust Scale had been administered, the subjects were given the Lazeler and Hutch's (1980) Dyadic Trust Scale, which is an eight point scale where (1) is strongly disagree, and (7) is strongly agree. Debriefing. The subjects were asked about the way they reacted to the experiments after they finished the dependent measures. The subjects said that they felt the dancing or listening to music part of the experiment would actually happen. None of the subjects ignored the reasons of the manipulations. The subjects were told that they would not be asked to dance or listen to music.
After a long debriefing, they were informed that the researchers just wanted to know if trusting behaviors had an effect on trust. They were informed that letting your significant other dance with someone from the opposite sex is a trusting behavior. The subjects were told that in the group of actors, the subject's significant others were never aware of their choices, as it was also the same in the recipient groups, the subject's significant others were not asked if they would let them dance or listen to music. To end the experiment, the conductors of the research said they were...
Free research essays on topics related to: strongly disagree, intimate relationship, listen to music, point scale, strongly agree
Research essay sample on Listen To Music Strongly Disagree
