Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Time Period B C - 1,020 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Several weeks ago I visited the Museum of Man- specifically the exhibit of Egyptian artifacts. I observed the Funerary Stela of Menthuhotpe. This piece is obviously from the early Egyptians, probably during the Old Kingdom Dynasty, which spanned several thousand years around 2000 B. C...

The pieces resemblance to the reliefs during this time period is striking (one example of similar work is the relief in Tis mastaba which shows him watching a hippo hunt created between 2450 and 2350 B. C. ). This is an example of a stela or stele. A stela is a carved or inscribed stone slab or pillar. This piece could be a stele carved in sandstone, or perhaps, painted limestone. Paint used in this Although the Museum of Man calls it a stela, it reminds me of a stele- which Gardners Western Perspective defines as a carved stone slab erected to commemorate a historical event or, in some other cultures, a grave (p. 23).

The similarity of these two definitions is striking, so obviously the two terms refer to the same type of art. Whatever it is called, it is obviously what is represented in this example. This stela re-creation is about 2. 5 feet tall which could make sense if it were simply a relief placed in the tomb of a noble person or royalty. My initial thought is that this piece seems too small. If it were in fact placed within the tomb, it is an appropriate size, although portrayals subjects in isolation are rarely found in early Egyptian art.

Typically portraits of this size would be memorials to the deceased, though this was a practice more common to the Romans during the Hadrian Empire, than to the early Egyptians. I have to wonder if this re-creation is a representation of a much larger relief whose scale may have been significant enough to cover an entire wall. The composition, or arrangement of figures in this piece, focus on the individual who is centrally located. He is framed by a solid strip which borders him on three sides, and is capped by multicolored stripes which line the top of this slightly erratic piece. The multicolored stripes draw the eye vertically downward to the human depiction.

These colorful elements, though interesting, seem to serve little known purpose other than to draw attention to the main feature of this piece, the man in the center. As mentioned earlier, the subject of this work is a man depicted in isolation. He stands by himself and seems to be reading a cuneiform inscription on the wall near his head. He is portrayed in minimal clothes, a simple piece of cloth wrapped around his waist to be exact. This indicates that he is not a person of royal descent because he is not adorned with any precious stones or metals, as people of importance often were. Another indication of royal lineage which is absent is elaborate headdress and neck adornment as seen in the Death mask of Tutankhamen.

One final element that would indicate importance in society during this time period is the horned helmet as seen in the Victory stele of Naram-Sin. This element is also, quite obviously absent. The way that the artist portrayed this human figure is quite predictable for the early Egyptians. This man is shown in composite view, which shows the individuals most characteristic attributes, though it is not necessarily true to actual physicality. In other words, his body is shown from several viewpoints. This mans torso is shown in frontal positioning, so that his shoulders and arms are visible.

A composite of his legs show a profile view of his knees and feet, as though they are being viewed from the side. He is posed in a rigid stand point that suggests movement, since he is not looking at the viewer straight on, but faces the way that his feet are pointed as though he intends to travel in that direction. He holds a tall stick, but the significance of this is unknown. Further analysis of this mans physical portrayal leads us to realize that the style which he is depicted in is extremely unrealistic. There is no muscle definition or true representation of shape.

We gather that the subject was probably thin, but with no indication as to muscle tone or natural shape in arms, torso and legs, we are left to wonder whether this is an accurate depiction of his true physicality. This figure is not shown in three dimensional viewpoint, though because he is a relief, he is carved out of the stone (slightly raised). His clothing is very simplistic and also seems to be an unreal portrayal of the actual shape of his cloth wrap. The wrap comes to a point far off his knee, which is obviously not a natural movement of cloth. Another problem with the shape of his clothes is the line that indicates a break in the cloth. It is perfectly straight, which, again, is not something that most cloth is capable of unless excessively starched and starch obviously did not exist at this time.

This figures location in space is relatively unclear. While it is obvious that he is standing on level ground, the viewer is left to wonder where exactly he stands. There are cuneiform inscriptions that stop when interrupted by the border, which leads the viewer to think that the subject stands in some type of room, probably one of significance since it has writing on the wall during a time when writing was relatively obsolete. The painting on this piece, as almost every other aspect of it, is extremely simplistic. The edges of objects are clearly defined, with no attempt to shade or shadow any area of the picture.

There are no apparent brush strokes, though at this point in time, artists probably used primitive tools to apply paint rather than brushes used by artists from more advanced societies. This stele is quite typical of the early Egyptians with rigid body depiction, lack of detail, and minimal attention to the true physical state of the location and human subject depicted.


Free research essays on topics related to: cloth, b c, carved, relief, time period

Research essay sample on Time Period B C

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com