NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... court. The testing procedure is very intense, absolutely accurate and cannot be falsified. The tests included blood tests, written and computer based testing, as well as stimuli testing with probes attached to the phallus. The stimuli testing included both still image and video forms, in addition to audio stimuli testing and written materials.
The result of these test concluded my husband was determined to be a normal male in every way. Again, these tests were on our own recourse, since we wanted the court and our community to know what kind of man Ivan Cohen is. This report was forwarded to the crown and subsequently, to the OPP criminal psychologist for comment. He agreed with and accepted the report, stating had he met my husband, he would have completed the same tests. Even with this confirmation, the OPP still submitted the original, damaging report to the court for consideration. Family Hardship. 1.
Detective Constable Anton Litchfield, on returning for the second search of our home, said that if he didnt get my husband, and he pointed at our 17 year old son, Ill be coming back for you 2. The police arrived at our home at 5: 50 am on July 2, 1997. They pulled our eldest son out of bed and had him dress in front of the officers. As they were going into our youngest childrens room, 10 and 11 at the time, I stopped them and got the children up. 3. I was questioned by Det. Cst.
Litchfield and another officer in my backyard, wearing only a housecoat, having been taken out of a bath. I was not wearing undergarments and was not permitted to return to my bedroom to get dressed, not even with an escort, even though I was having my period. After this interrogation, where I was told to tell them everything I knew and that my husband had already confessed, I ran down the street to a neighbour, in only my housecoat. This incident was never presented in court. 4. Det.
Cst. Litchfield attended at our sons high school, Barrie North Collegiate, flashing a business card identifying himself as an Investigator, Child Pornography, Project P, offering his card to the office staff and seeking to speak with our son. The Principal was concerned and phoned us at home. He found this visit highly irregular, as police officers know they cannot question a minor without the presence of a parent or guardian. When the principal refused to allow our son to be questioned, the officers left immediately, causing the principal to make notes of the visit for future reference since this was a highly irregular procedure for police. He felt this visit was to create awareness and embarrass our son, and, had the police wanted to pick our son up for questioning, they could have picked him up off the street less than 15 minutes later when school ended.
Our son was in his OAC year and due to the stress and harassment at school, he was unable to complete his winter semester. 5. The search of our home took about 12 hours, and was performed by approximately a dozen officers. I have never had the feeling of having been so violated as returning to our home after this was over. At the commencement of the search, I told the officers where to reach me if they needed access to anything in our home. Rather than contact me, they pried open and broke my sons new briefcase, a special gift received as a bar mitzvah present from his grandfather and uncle, and then hid the damaged briefcase under a bed in a corner. When I returned to our home at about 4 oclock, the house was in shambles.
I demanded the officers return the house to the condition they found it in. Since they were not finished their search I had to again leave, and when I returned at 8 oclock that evening, the house was in a visually improved condition. They had simply jammed everything in drawers. 6. My husband was employed by RadioShack as Manager, National Sales Promotion.
After the charges were laid, he was placed on leave of absence, and subsequently terminated by RadioShack. Ivan found a sales position with Modular Telephone Interface Limited, now Less Networks, in Oakville. His performance in this position led to promotion to Sales Manager, even though they were aware of the proceedings against him. However, they felt the trial publicity and the calls to the company were too detrimental and Ivan again was terminated.
Ivan is now employed in another field, outside of sales. 7. The harassment of our youngest children at their school and in the neighbourhood by both children and adults, including one adult who was one of his Navy League Cadet leaders was too hard to bear and we relocated to another community to rebuild our lives. 8. The current publicity surrounding the appeal has again put our family in the limelight, and our new community, where we had been accepted for who we are, now regard us in disdain. This is perhaps the most important reason for asking you here today, to tell our side of the story.
Actions of the police. There were many incidences of police activity that show the investigation was targeted, with disregard for information that would exonerate my husband. Throughout the preliminary hearing, information coming to light that would help prove innocence was ignored, however, any possible evidence to convict was vigorously followed up. During the trial, our eldest son became aware of some of the information contained in the RCMP report on our hard drives. In addition to information regarding his former friend found on a broken hard drive seized from our home, there was additional information on another user, who used an almost identical nickname on the chat areas. Emails were found where this individual was attempting to procure young female friends.
When investigated, at this persons home page, we discovered he was employed as a senior technical for Sprint Internet which gives him considerable knowledge about the workings of the internet. That evening, Justin searched and found him in a child pornography area on the internet. Justin engaged him in a conversation and the individual indicated he had hundreds of child pornography images. During the direct-connection conversation, Justin performed two system tests that confirm the identity of the chatter.
These tests are NETSTAT and TRACERT. The police did not follow up this information. It is important to note these tests were never attempted during conversations with the perpetrator of the crime for which my husband was convicted, or if they were, the information was never released. In reading the chat logs presented by the police to the court, there were several times the chatter offered to meet the undercover police officer. Im at a loss to understand why they never arranged such a meeting and resolve this matter at that time with an arrest. About a year and a half before the trial, the OPP contacted the Ministry of Transportation, and advised them of my husbands Record of Convictions and had his Class B drivers license rescinded.
Ivan had no convictions of any kind at that time. These, as well as many other incidents of police activity were brought to the attention of the Professional Standards Branch of the OPP. Although they initially showed much interest, because the complaint to the PSB was over six months past the time of the activities, and because this was still before the courts, under the Police Act Section 59 (4), they did not have to investigate and considered the matter closed. The appeal procedure for this is to OCCOPS, the provincial government / civilian police review agency.
We forwarded our information to OCCOPS, who supported to OPP decision not that the officers were right or wrong, but, because of the six month deadline, they didnt have to investigate their own. Summary Nothing will ever change what has been said in the media, and, after investing $ 70, 000 in legal fees, we can no longer fight. My husband will serve his 14 month house arrest sentence and have a criminal record for a crime he did not commit. We want to live in peace and harmony in the community where we reside. We want people to see us as the people who have moved to this community, participated in this community, helped in this community.
We want to again become active in this community, and hold our heads high. Our children have flourished here, with the wonderful friends they have met, through not only the schools, but the community itself. Our friends have stood beside us throughout this entire affair, and we want to thank those that know us and supported us. We want the members of our new community who have come to accept us for who we are and how we act to feel the same way now, as they did prior to the adverse publicity of earlier this week. Thank you. Nancy Cohen
Free research essays on topics related to: ivan, testing, child pornography, opp, eldest son
Research essay sample on Eldest Son Child Pornography
