Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Critique Of The Historical Debate On Versailles Treaty - 1,341 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

The treaty of Versailles that closed the First World War was set up as a way to ensure peace. It was hoped that the treaty would ensure that the first world was had been the war to end all wars however this was not to be and the treaty became the subject of much scrutiny pretty much from the get-go. Many of the youthful insiders from the American and British delegations claimed immediately after the conference that Wilson had abandoned his earlier plans and had in effect betrayed his supporters. Others felt that Wilson had kept his main objective in mind; peace while others had tirelessly sought other benefits from the treaty, mostly revenge and money. The level of hostility towards the treaty by many historians and veterans of the conference set a standard that was to continue of heightened emotion where the treaty was concerned. The unsympathetic ruling of the treaty against Germany and the strongly different opinions that emerged after it was finished set the scene for the abundance of hostile debate that was to follow for some years to come on the various issues surrounding the treaty.

The first and most famous critic of the Versailles peace treaty was John Maynard Keynes. Keynes was the senior treasury official sent as a member of the British group to the Versailles peace conference. Keynes did not agree with the terms laid out in the conference especially those related to the reparations payments that Germany was expected to begin paying. After his later resignation and possibly due in part to his annoyance at his suggestions for the reparations repayments being ignored he wrote an extremely controversial book entitled The economic consequences of the War within which he outlined his disagreements with the treaty and claimed that not only was it not possible for Germany to pay the reparations given their economic situation but and even more controversially that the issue of reparations would eventually cause further conflict in Europe and possibly the outbreak of another war. Keylor in his article A re-evaluation of the Versailles Peace reflected that Keynes strong opinions on the peace settlement may have been due to his personal sense of guilt at having served in government during the war while his pacifist friends objected to it and regularly expressed disapproval at his position. This, Keylor believed may have given him feelings of guilt thus giving him something to prove later.

Whatever his motivations were in writing his works, his book was one of the more influential books of his time and its popularity reflects the public interest in the issue. Given the ferocity of the attack by Keynes on America and most importantly on Wilsons motives in his book it is not at all surprising that Wilsons supporters were not long in penning their rebuttals to his claims. The most well-known of these and the first to be published was that of Ray Stannard Baker, a journalist who had served during the conference himself as a press representative for Wilson. His close role during the conference gave him access to a variety of resources with which he built a well informed attack on Keynes claims. Where Keynes had painted Wilson as a weak ruler who had been easily manipulated by his European Allies, Baker portrayed him as a quiet hero, alone and unwavering in his quest for total peace. Baker placed all of the blame for the lack of success and popularity of the treaty on the European Allies and had a lot of specific hostility towards the French.

Although the writings of Keynes and Baker were mostly preoccupied with laying blame for the treaties and at the same time distancing their respective countries from its lack of popularity as much as possible the public interest in the writings by Keynes and Baker (they both became bestsellers) indicates an interest and a public hostility towards the treaty out of which grew a tendency to regard it as a failure. Keynes and Baker were also not alone in their opinions. There were a host of attacks on various aspects of the treaty that were similar to theirs. One such attack came from Harold Nicholson who wrote the book Peacemaking 1919. Nicholson was another young member of the British delegation and was equally if not more negative about the treaty than Keynes; The historian, with every justification will come to the conclusion that we were very stupid men arrived determined that a peace of justice and wisdom should be negotiated; we left the conference conscious that that treaties imposed upon our enemies were neither just nor wise Interestingly, the historian William Keylor has since suggested that Nicholson's ideas were hindered by the fact that he had, at the time recently learned that his wife was having a lesbian affair which would have been a huge cause of embarrassment at the time and may have caused Nicholson's opinions to be more negative. This might under normal circumstances give reason to argue the validity of his comments were they not so similar to the comments of so many others at the time.

There was a significant change in the types of attitudes that were put forward during the cold war era most notably by the Princeton graduate Arno Mayer. His writings indicated a shift in the public perception of the treaty not as dramatic as the one experienced today but a significant one nonetheless. Mayer quoted Thorstein Veblen who had stated that 'Anti-Bolshevism was not visible in the clauses of the Treaty, but it was the very parchment on which the Treaty was written' This gave rise to a perception that the treaty had done more than influence European future history but soviet history also. More recently, historical debate on the treaty has become more sympathetic to the circumstances of the time. Also, in hindsight and with the perspective and experience of the Germans might seem quite fair considering their action during the war.

While the treaty was largely condemned during its own time and for some time afterwards by historians and interestingly by others as well. Including Lenin who said: What then is the treaty of Versailles? It is an unparalleled and predatory peace, which had made slaves of tens of millions of people including the most civilized. This is no peace, including the most civilized. This is no peace, but terms dictated to defenceless victim by armed robbers It has since begun to receive a softer reaction whereby historian have notably begun to suggest that it is unwise to criticise the treaty in modern terms when circumstances at the time would have been so different to today, and they have also begun to appreciate that the participants of the Versailles treaty would have been under immense pressure by their own governments and publics to achieve revenge and relief from the immense financial burden they were under. The treaty from the outset was and has been the subject of much debate among historical and indeed general circles.

The jeremiad of John Maynard Keynes set a standard of criticism that has been followed through until quite recently and has been supported and argued with since its first publishing. Nicholson, despite Keylor's attempts to disrepute his writings also put forward his own strong opinions on the treaty. His comments indicate a feeling of exasperation and exhaustion with regard to the treaty and discussions on the treaty. A slight shift in the perception of the treaty came about in the work of Mayer who, by using thought provoking quotations from Thorstein Veblen suggested that the treaty had paved the way for not just the Second World War but for Bolshevism as well. Finally, today the perception of the treaty is generally given due credit by historians there is considerably less debate on its pros and cons. When considered in terms of the environment within which it was drafted the treaty may be thanked for the creation of an often forgotten short term of peace and also for some valuable lessons in World treaties.


Free research essays on topics related to: john maynard keynes, treaty of versailles, put forward, public interest, european allies

Research essay sample on Critique Of The Historical Debate On Versailles Treaty

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com