NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
The animals use in medical experimentation has had been one of the most divisive issues since the seventeenth century. Edward Augustus Freeman, one of the most distinguished of recent English historians stated, The awful wrongs and sufferings forced upon the innocent, faithful animal race form the blackest chapter in the whole worlds history (Freeman). In the United States, it is estimated that twenty to seventy million animals suffer and die in the name of research. At least thirty-three animals die in laboratories each second worldwide, one every four seconds (Does Animal Testing... 32). People say: We have rights over animals. They are given to us for use.
Annie Besant is often described as a theosophist, educator and friend of India say: [No one has the] rights to over them. [Everyone has] duties towards them (Besant). At no point and time should we ever justify ourselves through the pain and suffering of another being. Animal experimentation is a matter of life and death, regardless of what position one takes. The better informed individuals are about the issues, the more rational and logical their actions will be. The morality is rarely questioned by researchers, who generally choose to defend the practice rigidly, rather than challenge the obvious moral issues it raises. Experimenters betray their efforts to avoid morality.
Scientists quickly learn to take on such a mind-set from their superior, as Cindy Mur, a teacher and an editor, explains: "One message almost a warning that newcomers got was that it was controversial or risky to admit to having ethical concerns, because to do so was tantamount to admitting that there really was something morally wrong with animal experimentation, thereby giving ammunition to the enemy. They sacrifice animals rather than kill them, and they may note animal distress, but they rarely acknowledge pain or other suffering (Mur). Humans are using animals in experiments without noticing that animals can feel and suffer just like humans do. Humans are heartless, wicked and merciless towards non-human animals; humans have no thought for the feelings and suffering which they inconsiderately cause on animals. Peter Singer, a professor of philosophy who has written extensively on animal rights issues, has suggested that sentience is a better criterion than species: Sentient creatures are conscious of sensations (such as pain) and respond to them. A difference of species is not a good distinction because acting purely on the basis of species is no different than acting solely on the basis of sex or race.
The word animal rights supporters have created to describe such thinking are speciesism, or discrimination against other species. Sentience is a more relevant guideline because it distinguishes animals that can feel pain. (Day 55 - 56) If a human tortures and / or kills a non-human animal, they should be penalized to the same extent as they would be for abusing another human. Yet, no one seems to care that everyday billions upon billions of innocent animals are being sickeningly, nauseatingly, hideously, vilely, anesthetically murdered for meat. In the bible, it says; Then God said let us make man in our image and let him have dominion over fish of the sea and the birds of the air, and over the cattle and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth...
Genesis 1: 28 (Gods Word 239). So many people mix this statement up, theyre like why should animals have rights, god doesnt say they should! Well in the bible, it doesnt say that we have the right to work the hell out of them, run them into the ground, brutally murder them, bash them, and maim them! Its just like the way parents have domain over their children, they hold no right to use their children as tools, and they have no right to abuse them.
It means they have the responsibility to care for them. Opposing to what many people believe, testing drugs on animals often give faulty results. More than 205, 000 new drugs are marketed worldwide every year, most undergo the most archaic and unreliable testing methods still in use: animal studies quoted from PETA, the largest animal rights organization in the world (Animal Experimentation). Although animals may seem like the perfect species for testing new drugs, the experiments are unreliable and can cause unidentified side effects. Animals are deemed necessary to develop new products for human to use. Scientists have developed many drugs by animal experimentation.
Dr. Ray Greek, MD a medical doctor and author of several books attacking the efficacy of animal experiments, dismiss the idea of physiological resemblance and Dr. Jean Swingle Greek, DVM said: "We (human and non-human animals) differ on a cellular and molecular level, and, importantly, that is where disease occurs. "We were finding, through scientific research, that extrapolating data from animals to humans is misleading, unnecessary, dangerous, or all three. " (Animal Experimentation/Vivisection) Animals are similar but not identical to humans and can develop some of the same health problems. When these problems are inside an animal it can have the same reactions as a human could. Animal experiments do not solve medical problems or help us to improve in medical field. Opposite to a majority of the human population belief, animals are not perfect species to find treatments for diseases.
An animal can experience different physical and psychological effects compare to a human experiences. It is also impossible to re-create a naturally occurring disease, therefore many side-effects an animal may experiences could not occur because of the change in the disease. The belief is held that animal experimentation is necessary in order for vaccines, cures and treatments for human illnesses to be effective. But, the fact of the matter is animals react differently than humans to various vaccines. Since humans and animals do not contract the same diseases, these diseases have to be induced onto the animals. In addition, experimental treatments that have been proven effective on animals will not necessarily work on people.
Experimenting drugs on animals can keep safe drugs off the market and keep dangerous drugs available for humans. Animal testing is unreliable, and humans should begin to not trust the information given about a drug according to an animal test. Also, humans are as almost alike as animals; we are closely related to them. It is unfair to put them through excruciating experiments just to know if humans can wear a new oil sun block. Humans are better test subjects than animals are because it is impossible to re-create naturally occurring human diseases that arise from within, in a healthy animal or even in a healthy human. This is simply because once it is re-created it is artificial and no longer the original, natural disease.
By re-creating a disease it is impossible to tell how the side effects have changed through reconstruction and the differences in the progression of the disease. When we re-create a disease, it is inevitable that vital information is lost to re...
Free research essays on topics related to: naturally occurring, side effects, animal testing, animal experimentation, animal experiments
Research essay sample on Animal Experimentation Naturally Occurring
