NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Should cloning for human benefits or even human cloning itself be allowed in society today? That is a question we must ask ourselves. Less than two years ago, an event in genetic history changed the worlds perspective on "Reproduction" and added to the worlds conscience a new element to the study of Biology. This event immediately caught my interest and intrigued me. It was the birth of a unique sheep named Dolly.
Dolly was a clone sheep born on February 12 th 1997 and this sheep doesnt have a father or mother. Dolly's existence stuck like super glue onto the worlds mind and refused to let go. The world started pondering the true potential of cloning and how it could affect mankind. The world considered the possibility of human cloning, the advantages and the disadvantages. Ever since the birth of sheep called Dolly is a question that ceased to worlds mind: Should human cloning be a part of our society? The first attempts at artificial cloning were started as early as the beginning of this century.
The first implantation of a nucleus into an egg cell occurred in 1952 by Robert Briggs and Thomas J. King in Philadelphia. Briggs and King transferred the nuclei of Leopard Frog's eggs. However, the cloning attempt was unsuccessful and the egg cells did not develop. Successful nuclear transfer of the embryo cells did not occur until the 1970 's, when a scientist named John Gurdon repeated Briggs/Kings's frog implantation.
The Oocytes of the frogs successfully developed into tadpoles. Major breakthroughs in cloning technology came in the 1980 's and 1990 's. In 1994, Scottish scientists Dr. Ian Wilmut and Keith Campbell cloned "Megan and Morag"; the world's first cloned sheep. Soon afterwards, Dolly was also cloned.
Presently, scientists who believe that cloning should be allowed are striving to perfect nuclear transfer technology in hope of harnessing its many advantages. There are, of course, other scientists who are against cloning. At that time, all the religious people came into the play. They started to announce that cloning should not be allowed in anywhere in or out side the earth and they have to reject it in different ways. They felt that it is wrong to mimic natural creation, and play with gods creation. World religions started to make an arguing about the process of cloning and every religion got closely the same thought.
In Hinduism, the Hindus rejected the thought of cloning and they are not allowed to injure sentient beings, so the tradition rejects both animal research and the destruction of embryos. In Native American religion have issued formal public statements advising against human reproductive cloning because of legislation that could ban human cloning In Buddhism, the Buddhist rejects the process of cloning. The Dalai Lama once said if the person has been cloned then the good human qualities will transfer to bad qualities. Buddhist monks said that cloning is just a foolhardy attempt to eliminate suffering from the world. Buddhism's eight fold Path also prohibits harm to any sentient beings, which presents possible restrictions on embryo and animal research. In Islam, the Muslim people reject the process of human cloning because its wrong to playing with gods creation.
Muslims wouldn't support cloning as whole body with a soul, but they support cloning as part of body system because it would help the sickness people and donate part of bodys system. Also they said that the children are gift from God. God created man and women; he instituted marriage for their manual benefit and for the procreation of children. God told Adam and Eve to Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it.
In todays society, religious opinion about human cloning is probably the same. The supporters for human cloning argue that human cloning should not be allowed in anywhere, as the research may have to potential to eliminate many of the world's problems such as animal extinction and can also benefit mankind in many ways. On the other hand, the contest of human cloning and the religious people said that cloning is unethical and should not be defying the very foundation of natural creation. Religious opinion on cloning is still vastly divided. Many religious groups are against cloning because they feel that it is wrong to take part in Gods creations.
They believe that scientist should not take the work of god into their own hands. Others religious people felt very strongly that human cloning is immoral and unethical because human cloning could destroy their age-old concept of "father" and "mother." If an offspring is cloned from a parent, the offspring would no longer actually share genetic traits. I, on the other hand, agree with the religious thoughts and believe that cloning should not proceed into the future. The disadvantages of human cloning far outweigh the advantages. Some advantages to human cloning include: Providing better research capabilities to find cures to many present diseases.
Bringing back friends or relatives who have passed away by cloning an identical copy. Providing children for women who are single and do not wish to have artificial insemination. The choice of physical characteristics (who to look like) Some religious people say that there are disadvantages such as: Cloning is unethical Cloning reduces genetic diversity Human cloning could produce another "Hitler", "Saddam", etc. Human cloning is not at all "natural" Some people, such as Lauren Tribe (a constitutional law scholar) say that "human cloning would alter the very meaning of humanity" wrong to mimic natural creation cloning should not proceed into the future Its wrong to play with gods creature. Human cloning is totally unethical. There are many moral wrong in genetically making a carbon copy of an individual.
The individuals from the past, such as Adolf Hitler, can be brought back if human cloning is legalized. However, Individuals from the past such as Hitler can be copied in exact physical form, and exact psychological form and even worse. Nuclear Transfer is only able to copy Hitler's DNA into another twin. As for the opinion of religion that human cloning is a fake and unnatural way of birth, I have found a big justification for that thought. In cloning, a real live being is produced differently like in birth. Also, the process of cloning does involve a machine or any artificial products.
Should human cloning be allowed in our society today? That question is up to you to answer because every people have a different thought about cloning. However, keep in mind the disadvantages of human is more than the advantages in human cloning. In conclusion the human cloning is used to break the word of god.
Children should not be created through technology, but through the mating of human beings. Human shouldnt be created by anyone but God. In this case, the human cloning is a negative manner.
Free research essays on topics related to: process of cloning, gods creation, human cloning, nuclear transfer, sentient beings
Research essay sample on Process Of Cloning Human Cloning
