NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... methods of non violent who not only speaks but also thinks in the language of non violence will refuse to accept this as impossibility. Gandhi stating that he lives under no illusion commented on Hitler as follows. Non-violence does not mean making peace. On the other hand, it means fighting bravely and sincerely for truth and doing what is just. Like all fights, there will be a terrible loss and pain.
But a satyagraha (soldier of civil disobedience) must go on. As a satyagraha, I do believe that non-violence is a potent weapon against all evils. I warn you however, that the victory will not come easy- just like it will not come easy with violent methods such as fighting with weaponry. Further we must take note many German generals while waiting to be executed after the judgment on their deeds have left behind in writings their deeply felt regret of their actions, possibly indicating the un-sustainability of evil in human content in the long run.
In this context I would like to quote Gandhi again You do not consider for one moment that the Englishmen do not suffer when thousands of your countrymen suffer, that we are so heartless? I do not think so. I do know that you will suffer; but I want you to suffer because I want to touch your hearts; and when your hearts have been touched will come the psychological moment for negotiation. Current conflict scenario is where non-violence must be applied It is in the current conflict scenarios that the method of non-violence need to be applied and is more applicable. Fact that it cannot be made to work no longer, stems from weaker mindset. Gandhi, in actual fact is the most cunning and calculative man of millennium.
Given such mindset effective employment of non violence principal will become practical. On scrutinizing two parties at conflict, it is generally acceptable fact that historically and statistically a party seeking an end result of annihilation or extermination of the other rarely survives in its aggression. Fortunately a bold statement can be made to the effect that humanity has increasingly matured enough to understand explicitly or implicitly the impossibility of such specific exterminations and it is reflected in most conflicts and their end results. It is this fact that must be celebrated first and driven home to awareness so as to sustain progress of humanity as a whole. From this we can see that coexistence, tolerance and if not immediately collaboration are an inevitable outcome of the future for the conflicting parties.
Deeper understanding and awareness of this reality is the way to faster conflict resolution however difficult and deep rooted the conflict may be. However, its granted that conflicts and even hate are useful preferable parts of humanity in its evolution. Like Marx said revolution is eternal. It happens in an individual or in society in many forms and usually seen as a necessary step that drives humanity forward for better values. Given this understanding it is increasingly importance to understand non violence as a tool for any conflicts.
Violence increases the scar and increases the divide between conflicting parties extending dispute beyond a lifetime hence rooting the divide. In many cases it comes to be forgotten that originally there was a time, fairer or not, where parties involved were living in harmony as they will have to some time in the future for the greater good of humanity with fairness and tolerance. It is easy to demonstrate the ineffectiveness of the violent means. It undermines the end result namely coexistence, cooperation and tolerance are inevitable to win the argument of conflict, to eventually resolve the conflict. By its means it increases the divide and risks rooting the conflict beyond a generation and hence hampers the advancement of humanity. Further, it requires unjustifiable human and economical costs pushing the conflicting parties backward relative to the advancement elsewhere.
Most importantly it reduces the intellectual capacities and emotional maturities in the long run and in effect reduces the freedom that it supposed to be about. Hence it is not an option. It is also easy to demonstrate the effectiveness of non violence means. It requires analysis and proper understanding of points of conflict. It requires wide awareness and mass support for points of conflict. It requires defined stages for accomplishment seeking reduction in the nature and points of conflict.
It doesnt advocate all or nothing approach. Instead it seeks out something all the time. When seeking something, all its forces are mobilized in creating that single extra opportunity. In other words it walks towards the freedom by acquiring better rights. Tools of non-violence when employed consistently and repeatedly, offer a better chance of success especially if violent atrocities are to be committed against such protest. In addition a non-violence means is an effective progressive economical approach that is fully aware of the eventual realities.
It can be seen that violent means cannot be a valid option in the light of its effects and ineffectiveness. Further, it is also seen that a non-violent means are progressive and are intuitively more aware of realities especially of the cause. Its only natural to conclude that it remains to be re-discovered as the only means by all parties that may engage in conflict as result of disagreement for a fairer world. It is an active and always workable theory The most misguided accusation on non-violence can be to call it a passive resistance. Its as active as an active resistance can get. This question can only arise out of ignorance of what a non-violence resistance is.
Richard G. Fox correctly observes, The concepts of Gandhian nonviolence and pacifism are not at all close. Gandhi did not believe in turning the other cheek in every situation -- evil had to be resisted, best done nonviolently, but better by violence than not at all. Passive resistance was the term that Gandhi originally used for his South African protest, but he soon disowned the term in favor of his neo locution, satyagraha or soul-force. Gandhi has explicitly stated that the Passive resistance is a misnomer for nonviolent resistance. In fact, understanding the nature of non-violence as an active engagement is the key to understand the overall thinking advocated by non violence means.
When stated as an active engagement it includes limitless possibilities while including traditional tools such as civil obedience and fasting. Non-violence approach is always fresh and is always employable effectively. It emerges in the most unlikely places where the balance of power is skewed terribly on one side. As an example take Gandhi-Con from computing world. Although, a very different example from hacker-culture, it illustrates the application of Gandhi concept appropriately. The humble beginning of grander phenomenon that has seen Linux and other peer to peer clients which very well survived beyond all stages of opposition from power houses is taken as a standing proof of Gandhi-Con.
To put it simple let me quote Gandhi, First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. "Perpetual peace is no empty idea, but a practical thing which, through its gradual solution, is coming always nearer its final realization... " IMMANUEL KANT
Free research essays on topics related to: end result, gandhi, passive resistance, resistance, long run
Research essay sample on Passive Resistance End Result
