NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
The reinforcement for Clair's behavior was mainly dependent on the approval she received from her popular peer group. She has a notion that she needs to be popular or approved in order to be seen as better in her school. Reinforcement would also be abiding by her parents so she is able to shop with her families wealth. After she had bought something materialistic, it makes her feel good. There was a battle of the reinforcement values in this movie. One was, as stated above, to seek approval of her older known peers known to be stuck-up, condescending, and popular.
The other is reinforcement of a more positive virtue. This virtue is as stated, thinking independently and making choices in ones life for oneself instead of seeking approval from her snobbish peer group. This would help he correct her choices of behavior so they do not become repetitive. At the beginning of the film Clair wasnt to open to the later reinforcement but then discovered it via introspection through group discussion. They discussed peer groups, virginity, suicide attempts, and assaults.
Although many of the ways they talked about each other had been derogatory in some way. Clair still introspected. When Clair was confronted about negative evaluations and opinions about herself, she became upset. Her expectancies had been almost the same throughout the movie until her introspection. She would either get upset, denial, switches the blame to person discussing the problem, or rationalized her behavior. An example of rationalizing would be her assuming that Andrew would say Hi.
To Brain in the halls, then Andrew would bash Brian in front of his sporty peers. This means possibility of being categorized as a defensive external. If Clair is a defensive external, then the Social Cognitive Learning Theory would be in hot water. This is because the theory states that people who indicate that they are controlled by the outside are not suppose to be competitive. This is a hypocritical theory in comparison to the external locus of control. Clair needs to be approved by groups immediately or she feels left out.
Therefore, her expectancy in this situation is to be approved by others. This would also be known as social desirability. Clair also jumps in on bashing another person verbally when her peer does it. Thus, her expectancy would be to get on the bandwagon. An example would be Andrew bashing Bender, then Clair joining it to feel part of the popular crowd with Andrew.
Clair, by the end of the movie, did show some deviation in her expectancies by being more empathetic to others and independent with her thinking. This showed that she had an external locus of control but was starting slightly to pitch off to the internal side of the E-I scale. But none the less, my estimation would say that she has a way to introspect before she gets out of the predominately external territory. The interaction ists view from Clair's standpoint is her need for approval and popularity around peer groups and social situations. Expectancy of Clair is shown to be low at the beginning of the film, but brought up after the group discussion. Her expectancies become more internal via introspection of herself brought on by group advocation.
The advocation may have been harsh and blunt at times, but it helped in the functioning of Clair finding other ways to think about herself, old peers, new peers, and parents. I believe this shaped her character in a positive way to think for herself instead of a group-think automaton looking for approval from other condescending teenage girls. Firstly, Clair was using her expectancy outcomes. Her competency became more prevalent, she seemed more concerned about advancing her newly independent self and peers (The Breakfast Club).
This could mean Clair would be more open to a self regulatory plan. (Bandura) A personnel agency became more prevalent within Clair as time went on in the movie. She looked upon herself from the pressure put on her from the group. The group of five teenagers in a Saturday Detention helped bring out bottled up factors of anger against parents, approval of peer groups, and the truth that most peer group dynamics are the same. There was reciprocal causation involved in Clair's character as well.
Her personal agency and the detention groups collective agency are both involved in a reciprocity relationship which helped her introspect. This introspection helped her influence her behaviors towards different peer groups and people other then her primary peer group. This also helped Clair in the development of her forethought. There were a few examples of observational learning Clair showed in this film. The 1 st would be Clair covering for Bender when he escapes from the closet because the rest do as well. The 2 nd would be Clair smoking pot via observational learning.
Feeble topics, but those are the examples. I believe an act of model or modeling occurred when Clair did her cleavage lipstick trick. Clair admitted to herself she has had approval issues with her popular peer group and didnt want to pull there line anymore. I would consider this a self-criticism. The conclusion of the movie showed that Clair had made several attempts at self-influence.
Therefore, Clair is utilizing her self regulatory processes. Clair's self-efficacy has also improved since she walked through Server High Schools doors. Clair could have response facilitation brought on by her automaton popular friends. An example of diffusion of innovation would be smoking pot with the group as a new experience to be learned. I believe she did this because she didnt want to be known as a prude. The extrinsic rewards she was interested in were money and material goods via shopping.
The intrinsic rewards she had received was self-influence and a very new love in John Bender. The Defensive behaviors would line up with Rotters defensive external definition associated with Clair's expectancies. The idea of social comparison had been used by Clair and the new group during there circle discussion. They compared each other socially via peer groups and attitudes. Clair did use dehumanization as a tactic in conversation as well.
Clair proclaimed herself better then the others solely because of her group and monetary status while calling Brian an academic nerd and John a criminalistic drug burner. The burner remark was a little hypocritical after she had smoked it herself. She used the advantageous comparison method to explain how each of them would treat each other on the Monday after the detention they would be back in school. She discussed how she would do the same thing to Allison as Andrew would hypothetically do to Brian. Use this as an example: (Andrew [Clair] would say Hi. To Brain [Allison] in the halls, then Andrew would bash Brian in front of his sporty peers [stuck-up popular girls]. ) Lastly, Clair was using displacement, blaming her condescending peer group and parents for her condescending behavior.
Free research essays on topics related to: group discussion, observational learning, peer groups, locus of control, beginning of the film
Research essay sample on Locus Of Control Beginning Of The Film
