NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
A wide variety of groups that reflect on gay rights and their popular opinions are truly consequential from these many assemblage. The only major nostalgia that homosexuals yearn for is to have the same rights as heterosexuals, homosexuals want nothing more or nothing less. Homosexuals are a growing minority with nearly a million gays and lesbians identifying themselves as members of same-sex couples in the 2000 census. Exception of that the gay population is much larger, since the census didnt provide an opportunity for single homosexuals to identify their sexual orientation, and didnt count gay couples who live apart (Mason 1). There is indisputable explanation to why homosexuals should not have the same rights as heterosexuals. Our country disgraces itself when it Accepts homosexuality as a sufficient cause for deprivation of normal civil rights (Nava, Dawidoff 144).
If a homosexual is United States citizen, they should receive the same rights as all other citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation. Marriage ceremonies are ever changing. More wives are now becoming equivalent rather than subordinate partners. For exemplar interracial matrimony is now widely acknowledged and expected. In addition, marital failure itself, rather than the responsibility of one partner, may be grounds for a divorce (Stoddard 32). With all of these changes would it not be accurate to say that legalizing and recognizing same-sex marriages is the next step?
From societal and religious conventions, marriage entails legally imposed financial responsibility and legally authorized financial benefits. Matrimony provides automatic legal protections for the spouse, including medical visitation, succession of a deceased spouses property, as well as pension and other rights (Stoddard 41). Same-sex couples do not want to get wedded to front it in homosexual couples faces, they just want to do it in general to be recognized by their country, so they would like to be accepted. Homosexual couples will love each other whether they are married or not, so stopping them from being able to marry will not make them disappear. If anything, homosexuals will be more outspoken because they want to feel like they belong in the United States.
Many people argue that matrimony is a spiritual ceremony, but that is only true if a person wishes to make it religious. According to the constitution, matrimony does not have to be between a male and a female. The real implication of the constitutions statements on marriage ceremony is that, intimate association of consenting adults who want to share their lives and commitment with each other (Stoddard 34). That same-sex couples have just as much intimacy and need for marital privacy as heterosexual couples and any laws allowing heterosexual. However not same-sex, couples to marry infringes upon and discriminate against their fundamental right (Stoddard 34). More recently, a 1967 the Supreme Court announced, Marriage is one of the most basic civil rights of man essential to the pursuit of happiness (Stoddard 52).
Men and women alike all want to reach happiness, and our country may be keeping homosexuals to reach this state of mind because some people do not deem it necessary for same-sex couples to marry. Letting homosexuals wed will not hinder our society in any way, European countries that have legalized same-sex marriages have not seen any changes in their countries other than feeling more unified. If the government allows homosexuals to wed each other, our country will be taking a little step towards the future. For the most part people view the armed forces as a way to give back to their country, but are it fair to not allow certain people serve their country?
Openly homosexual people cannot be in the arm forces. Even though there have been homosexuals in the services, they are not acknowledged and that sexual preference is ignored. Several gay men and lesbians in the armed forces are ostracized for their lifestyle choices and most drops out because of the open discrimination against them, or they are dishonorably discharged. The armed forces has a Dont ask, dont tell policy where it is made clear that if you are homosexual, no one wants to know (Burrelli 1). Homosexuality acts and acknowledging ones own homosexuality is banned in the military, according the David F. Burrelli in a CRS Issue Brief in 1996.
Homosexuals are for the most part banned because, when asked in a survey, 75 % of men in the military and 50 % of women in the military strongly opposed gays in the military. The men and women, who strongly oppose gays in the services, said that if Homosexuals are allowed into the military, gays should expect violent repercussions (Burrelli 2). To many, these statistics seem like a threat to any homosexual that intends to join the services. By explanation, a patriotic American does not have to be heterosexual, so logically there should be no ban on gay men and lesbians in the armed forces.
It is unfair to not let homosexuals fight for our country if they so choose, not letting them fight seems to be giving them a special right too. It is precise to say that the people that oppose homosexuals in the armed forces do not intend them to have a special right, but that is exactly what is occurring. Is it just to tell homosexuals in the armed forces, You can give your life for your country, but you cant live your life in your country (Nava, Dawidoff 145)? It is because they are different, but that does not make it accurate.
The only discrepancy between homosexuals and heterosexuals are the people they are attracted to, something that cannot be change. However, people that discriminate do not share this view. As more homosexuals are Coming out of the closet, hate crimes against homosexuals are also increasing. In addition, That hate crimes against homosexuals are up about 260 % from 1988 to 1996; these numbers are still underestimates because not everyone reports a crime (Jackson, 1). According to a different study, 14 % of the crimes not reported to the police because, The victims feared more harm from the police (Nava, Dawidoff 144). Homosexuals are more likely to suffer violent attacks compared to any other group; six times more likely than Jews or Hispanics and two times more than blacks.
Gay men and women seem to becoming the new minority that the majority victimizes. The labeling of gays as sexually degenerate and unnatural is the same kind of labeling that has always been used to justify the denial of rights to individuals belonging to minority communities (Nava, Dawidoff 150). According to a 1989 survey done by Benjamin Jackson, 45 % of lesbians and 29 % of gay men had suffered through at least one violent attack. The president of the United States, George Bush is totally, Opposed to same sex marriages, and that administration lawyers were working to ensure these terms.
He has said, He opposes extending marriage rights to homosexuals, saying he believes marriage is between a man and a woman (CNN). In a 2003 poll that the USA Today did ask, That many people would favor a constitutional amendment that would define a marriage as between a man and woman, thus barring marriages between gay or lesbian couples. Here are the results, Yes: 50 %, No: 45 % (Page). Gay marriage: The state recognizes that civil marriages between gay or lesbian couples, who then would have the legal protections and rights of wedded heterosexuals in state and federal law. It is not legal in the United States, and are not obtainable anywhere in the United States of America.
Except that In Canada, an appeals court in June acknowledged a right for same-sex couples to get married under the Canadian constitution (Page). Why are homosexuals looked at as, Aliens (Nava, Dawidoff 148). They are still human beings with just one slight variation, and that is whom they are involved. Our government helps point out homosexuals differences by continuing denying basic civil rights to lesbian and gay Americans, which in turn Sends the message that their lives are less valuable than the lives of heterosexuals (Nava, Dawidoff 148). There is no evidence to prove that a homosexuals life is less valuable than a heterosexuals life, because it is not true. We are all humans, the only difference being who we sexually love; is that really something to hate someone for?
Homosexuality will not vanish if they do not get the rights they deserve; it will just make them more adamant about the justice they ought to have. People have always engaged in homosexual practices, with or without the sanction of family, church, and state (Nava, Dawidoff 148). Gay men and lesbians warrant the same rights as heterosexuals because we are all humans, the only difference being in whom we want to spend the rest of their our lives with. For the reason that there is only one difference, homosexuals should not be treated as outcasts in society. Furthermore, the services should not be able to ban different people. Our country is supposed to support and promote diversity, not hinder it.
Same-sex marriage should be legalized because there is no law stating it is illegal, but 48 states, all but Vermont and Hawaii, will not acknowledge a gay wedding. If a homosexual is United States citizen, they should receive the same rights as all other citizens, in spite of their sexual orientation. Gay men, bisexuals, and lesbians ought to have the preference to get married, they should not be discriminated against, and to be in the armed forces. Does it seem reasonable to keep all homosexuals from what they justly warrant? Reference: 1. Jackson, Benjamin. (2002) Anti-homosexual Crime Pages 1 - 2 Southern Poverty Law Center 2.
Bush wants marriage reserved for heterosexuals (2003, October 28) Retrieved from web 3. Mason, Margie. Census Figures on Same-Sex Couples. Page one http: //speak out. com /activism / issues / 4. Musbach, Tom, (2003) 'Don't ask, don't tell' discharges decrease.
web 2003 / 03 / 25 / 1 5. Nava, Michael, and Robert Dawidoff (1994) The Ick Factor: Yes. Taking Sides Pages 144 - 151 PG. 6. Page, Susan, (2003) (c) USA TODAY, Gay rights tough to sharpen into political 'wedge issue'. web x. html 7.
Stoddard, Thomas (1996) Gay Marriage: Make Them Legal. Current Issues and five Enduring Questions, Pg. 633. Bedford Books Boston
Free research essays on topics related to: hate crimes, homosexual couples, armed forces, gay or lesbian, sexual orientation
Research essay sample on Gay Or Lesbian Armed Forces
