Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Twelve Angry Men Reasonable Doubt - 694 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

The play Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose, is a play about 12 jurors that in an uncomfortable room have to discuss a life and death case about a boy that is accused or killing his father. the jurors do not really know eachother to talk to and wish they were anywhere but in that jury room. Every juror has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. In my opinion there were 3 main jurors in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is important because he is smart, brave, and fair.

Juror 3 was important because he was the antagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant. Juror 9 was important because he wasnt afraid of confronting other jurors. Juror 8 was a very important juror, he was the protagonist. He was the one that proved the truth. Juror 8 was very smart, he bought a knife similar to the one used in the crime to prove that is easy to get an identical knife, and he proved that it was impossible for the old man to make it to the scene of the crime in 15 seconds like he testified. Juror 8 was also brave.

He was the only one that voted not guilty in the first vote and he standard for what he believed in and confronted everybody. In addition, Juror 8 was also fair. He said Its not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die with out talking about it first when he was the only one that voted not guilty in the first vote. He also listened to everyones opinions and never insulted anyone. Juror 3 was also a very important juror in the jury room. Juror 3 was the antagonist.

He was the main enemy of Juror 8 and he was trying to keep people from believing that the boy was not guilty. Juror 3 was also mean. He wanted everyone to think the way he did, and lost his temper whenever they didnt. In addition, Juror 3 was also intolerant.

He didnt want to listen to anybody's opinions and in the discussion that he had with Juror 8 on page 147 in the book, it seemed that he personally wanted the kid to die. Another very important juror in the jury room was Juror 9. Juror 9 was a fair man. He voted not guilty because he had a reasonable doubt in his mind and he listened to everyones opinions, Juror 9 was also smart. He made a reasonable doubt by saying that the old man might of lied to get attention because he noticed that he was a quiet, frightened, insignificant man who has probably never been nothing all his life. He also remembered that the woman in the train had bifocals, and that she never took them off.

that made a reasonable doubt on everyones mind because it would of been very hard for the woman in the train to see the crime because she testified that she saw the boy kill hi father while she was trying to sleep and no one sleeps with their glasses on. In addition, he wasnt afraid to confront other jurors. He was the first one to support Juror 8 and he didnt care what others said and when he made some points, such as the old man and the bifocals, he didnt care what others said. In conclusion, Juror 8 is important because he is smart, brave and fair. Juror 8 was the main reason why the truth was proven, thats why he is the protagonist, he standard for what he believed in until the truth was proven. Juror 3 was the antagonist.

He was mean and intolerant. I think the main reason why he was so mean and intolerant is because his son wasnt a good son and that made him have a bad image of young kids, thats why he voted guilty, because in a way he thought that the accused was like his son. Juror 9 was fair, smart, and he wasnt afraid of Bibliography: Twelve angry men, by Reginald Rose


Free research essays on topics related to: juror, didnt care, twelve angry men, reasonable doubt, main reason

Research essay sample on Twelve Angry Men Reasonable Doubt

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com