Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Number Of People Remaining Employees - 1,277 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

According to a 1997 survey by the American Management Association (AMA), the most often claimed reasons for downsizing are organizational restructuring, business downturn, and reengineering of business processes. Downsizing has adversely affected 43 million jobs since 1980. Many organizations are realizing that downsizing may not be the best solution for reducing costs. The time and money it takes to train employees often make downsizing a wasteful procedure. By changing their business strategy, companies can find ways to maintain their workforce. Many organizations are now looking for alternatives to downsizing that allow them to save their employees, which are now seen as large assets.

Downsizing of staff is often undertaken when an organization needs to quickly improve its profits. A company under siege (or claiming to be) takes a look at its largest expense typically payroll and benefits and starts slashing. Many accounts exist that depict the sad consequences of worker displacement: the breakup of families, the loss of homes, and the blow to self-esteem from which the downsized never recover. Some researchers go so far as to describe the downsized worker as clinically traumatized, comparing the experience of downsizing as similar to that of other trauma: death, combat, abuse, violence, natural catastrophe, crime, chemical dependence disease and terrorism (Bumbaugh 30). The most well-known of these is a seven-part series published by The New York Times entitled The Downsizing of America. This series of articles (since enlarged and published as a book with the same title) was the largest set of related articles printed by the paper since it covered the Watergate scandal.

Some proponents of downsizing claim that the media has distorted the statistics on the number of people downsized, their fate and the impact on their former workplaces. The New York Times series has especially been attacked for too freely extrapolating statistics. There is no doubt that downsizing reeks havoc in the lives of those who lose their jobs, but critics claim that downsized workers find employment fairly quickly, and point to the statistics that show that jobs have been created at record numbers throughout the 1990 s'. Record numbers of jobs have been created, but U. S. Labor Department figures show that now only about 35 % of laid-off full-time workers end up in equally remunerative or better paid jobs (Uchitelle 3).

Downsizing does indeed increase profits for the organization that undertakes it, but these profits are short-lived. A survey by Wyatt Associates of Canadian downsized businesses found 40 % reported that downsizing did not result in reduced expenses and more than 60 % did not experience higher profits after cutting staff (Est 28). These and other studies show that at least half of all eliminated positions are refilled within a year after a major downsizing effort. One of our group members was the victim of downsizing, or what the company called a re-structuring effort.

Being a single mother of a pre-school child, this was very difficult to handle. The fate of her childs life was left unknown. Fortunately, the company announced this downsizing effort six months in advance, giving her the opportunity to search for another position. At the time she lacked higher education and could not find a job that would pay as well as her previous one. Looking for an answer, she made the conscious decision to better her and her daughters lives by continuing her education. Looking back on it now, she is thankful that she was given the opportunity to go back to college.

Unfortunately, many people dont have this opportunity and must take whatever job they can find. The negative effects of the remaining employees can be almost as serious as that of the victims. Many of these employees, still holding a position within a downsized company, have a constant fear of losing their job next. The morale will tend to tail off and an I dont care attitude will often set in.

Remaining employees may have a hard time concentrating on their work because of emotional distress. This can cause a lower performance, which may threaten productivity. Successful planning and innovating for the future require staff that is well-trained, willing to take risks, physically healthy, and committed to an organization. Downsizing, time after time, leads to exactly the opposite result. Organizations that think of and treat their employees as assets rather than liabilities can retain their staff, retrain them if necessary, and keep productivity up. Creativity and true strategic planning that includes close attention to capital costs and increased revenue generation can enable most organizations to avoid the quick fix of downsizing.

Downsizing drains an organization of the talent and loyalty of its workforce its most precious resource for growth and innovation. Whoever retains organizational memory has a priceless asset. The people who know what make an organization perform maximally are assets not costs to be reduced (Piturro 37). In many cases, employers lose money when they eliminate employees. Evan Schnade, representative of Patagonia, says employees are an investment. It takes a long time before an employee is fully trained.

At Patagonia, Schnade notes that it usually takes up to a year before an employee becomes productive. After such a long and costly investment Patagonia needs to hold on to its employees. To do anything else would be bad business. Management should adopt an intelligent approach and understand the repercussions that might entail the downsizing. Instead of adopting downsizing as a short-term plan for ineffectual performance, it would be better to adopt a long-term solution to improve the bottom line. One could look at the alternatives to gain cost savings within the organization.

Introducing new products, entering new markets, and cutting costs elsewhere within the company, are some of the many alternate ways that are worth considering (Rayburn 49). These can produce the desired outcome without jeopardizing the employees jobs. Showing employees that they are assets to the company can ultimately optimize their attitude, performance and productivity. They need to know the work they do is important and beneficial to the whole scheme of things. Unfortunately, In the modern competitive business scenario, many companies are pressured to make a quick decision to reduce costs and improve the bottom line. Although this is the case, there are some important questions that need to be asked before blindly falling into the downsizing trap.

Taking the time to ask these questions can save a lot of trouble in the future. Some of the questions that need to be considered to avoid any miscalculations that might have a negative backlash are as follows: What mix of skills do we need today? What skills are we likely to need in the future? Do we have the right number of people employed today? How will these numbers change in the future? How do our staffing costs compare to others in our type of business?

These are difficult but essential questions to consider when making hasty decisions that could have a disturbing foreboding. Research shows that downsizing is a risky gamble, with less than half of companies seeing improvements in productivity (Maurer 12). There is usually a need for a business plan change and calculated risk strategies before jumping to what most people think is the obvious way to cut costs. There is an array of alternatives to downsizing that a human resources department can exercise in times of pressure to save money. Many of the alternatives rest on two important pillars, the share pain and long-term linked vision. Share the pain deals with an extent of adopting painstaking measures on even terms among the high brass as well as the commoner working in the company without granting immunity to anyone (Maurer 12).

Long ter...


Free research essays on topics related to: long term, remaining employees, bottom line, number of people, york times

Research essay sample on Number Of People Remaining Employees

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com