Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Black Holes Hasn T - 1,750 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFS ARE LIKE AOUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFS ARE LIKE A ROAD MAP WHICH HELPS US AVOID WRONG TURNS, BUT WHICH NEEDS TO B? OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFS ARE LIKE A ROAD MAP WHICH HELPS US AVOID WRONG TURNS, BUT WHICH NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED WHENEVER IT IS CONTRADICTED BY OUR EXPERIENCE OF THE WORLD? Discuss this simile from the point of view of three of the fields you have examined during your TOK course, and of your experience of the TOK course itself. Since the dawn of mankind, Man has striven first to understand, and later to control, the World that surrounds him.

Patterns have been noticed, connections inferred, questions asked and answers proposed. Why are the stars always in the same place when the Nile floods? That? s the way our brains work, we are nothing less -and nothing more- than symbolic computers. We see things, we draw conclusions, we build up simplified versions of reality, models, that we can understand. And, more often that we?

d like to admit, we get it wrong. Having some form or the other of failsafe is, therefore, vital if we are to stay on track The distinction between reality and model, between Truth and metaphor, however, is all too often blurred, or ignored entirely. Often we consider Models, mere derivations, and Reality itself, to be one and the same. ? Tis not so: the map is not the territory!

All our knowledge amounts to is a simplified, digested, approximate, accessible bastardization of reality. It is our map, marking out the straight and narrow. Of the path less trodden it says nothing. From the moment we first open our eyes to the moment we breath our last, we are immersed in a flood of sensory information; and we do more than passively wallow in this sea of input. We (subconsciously, more often than not) select, edit, and subtly modify the data that our senses feed us; we simply cannot deal with it all, not in detail, at least. Thus, perception is very much an active affair: we build our vision of the world.

We spot relationships, pick out familiar features; associate the sweet scent of roses with the red flowers we see before us. We choose what features to draw on our map. Homo Sapiens Sapiens, however, is a creature wrought by merciless Nature to fulfil a task, and that task alone: to survive in the Savannah. That the skills evolved for outwitting various predators and prey are any use for anything but hunting / gathering is one of the most fascinating and incomprehensible quirks of natural selection. And sometimes, our information processing systems, designed with lion-detection in mind, are fooled. Who hasn?

t seen the optical illusion of the Penrose Triangle, and, more importantly, who hasn? t been fooled by it? We can see the triangle, but, until we look at it, its impossibility fails to register. Once we become aware that it is weird, the source of the weirdness is immediately apparent, but, in passing, our subconscious fails to notice anything special.

This is because understanding the Penrose Triangle requires a holistic judgement, only when we consider the big picture does it become evident that the shape is not self-consistent when considered as a whole. Each individual corner, however, taken as a self-contained unit, makes perfect sense. This simple optical illusion is one of many that demonstrate just how fallible our interpretation of the surrounding world is. It is indeed an example of our model, our metaphor, our map, leading us astray. If we don? t look closely at the errant frame, we will not notice that we?

re off track, and the implications of such a statement are truly horrific: how many things do we fail to notice, with what certainty can we ascertain that what we in passing perceive as being self-consistent is indeed so? How much of our knowledge contradicts itself? We, or our visual system at least, seem to be worryingly pragmatic in our perception of the world. Reassuringly, Science, based upon a rigorous foundation, is immune to such obscenities. Or isn? t it?

Science is a tool. A powerful tool to map the world around us, based upon the scientific principles of coherence, correspondence and reproducibility. But a mere tool nonetheless, it does nothing by itself, someone has to wield it. Let us consider, for example, the Queen of Sciences, Physics. It is hard to argue against it? s universal significance: whatever process our eyes fall upon, Physics has something to say about it.

An edifice laboriously constructed over the past three hundred years, observation upon observation, all cemented together by rigorous logic. A (reasonably) coherent whole. Reassuring, objective, monolithic, eternal: theories may be written and disproved, measurements taken and discarded, but Physics will remain, always. And yet, Physics too is nothing but a particularly successful model, a collection of Russian dolls, approximation within approximation, each successive level of mathematical complexity accounting for glitches in the previous theories; first Newton, then Einstein, then, well, who knows? Quantum gravity? How much of this vast corpus of knowledge is nothing but an artefact of its formulation, how much of it is a product of the underlying language -mathematics- in which it happens to be written?

Mathematics is very much the metaphor of physics, physics depends upon maths. But they are not the same thing, in the same way that, although Shakespeare? s Romeo & Juliet is written in English, it is not English itself. It has been said that [The greatest misconception about black holes is] that they actually exist [] the black holes that [] physicists study are only approximations [] of these collapsed stars.

In the strictest sense of the word, there are no black holes. Ideal black holes, whether their real counterparts exist or not, arise from, quite simply, divisions by zero. Thus we are presented with a model of extreme conditions, the basic ingredients of which come from far less extreme conditions. Is it possible that just as the corners of the Penrose Triangle disagree with each other, bits of physics might also not fit together well? Can our map be distorting the picture? Indeed, such embarrassing situations do arise, where the theories of relativity -gravity- and quantum theories -matter and most other forms of energy- meet such as at the core of a black hole.

General Relativity, a classical theory, predicts an infinitely dense singularity, or point with zero volume. Furthermore, it predicts that this point, this thing, is absolutely stationary (because there is no time for it to move through). Unfortunately, Heisenberg? s Uncertainty Principle, one of the basic tenants of Quantum Field Theory, states that it is impossible to know both the position and velocity of an object accurately, as measuring one parameter automatically interferes with the other.

Clash; who are we to believe? The theory of the immensely big or that of the unimaginably small? Does this single contradiction invalidate all their predictions? Again our map has led us astray, again conflicting counter-claims to knowledge spoil our fun.

Even mathematics itself, it turns out, suffers such maladies, although of a subtly different kind: not incoherence, but rather incompleteness. It is impossible for us to map every corner of a mathematical system from within that system itself, sometimes one must refer out of the system itself, just as if we needed aerial photographs to accurately map a coastline. It has been shown by G? del in his famous incompleteness theorems, that any formal mathematical system is unable to self-explain itself; there must exist within it theorems (true statements) that cannot be proven to be true.

However, one can prove such a statement to be undecidable by referring out of the system that contains it, and, provided that it is impossible to prove false statements, then the undecidable statement is proven true by proxy. Granted, this may seem a rather academic problem far removed from every-day reality. But what, then, about numbers with an infinite number of decimal places, those that cannot be expressed as a fraction, irrational numbers? Could they, too, be a mere artefact of our mathematical system, a simple counting system devised to number sheep? How can such numbers exist in a finite universe, one where there are insufficient objects to represent them. Are they some form of necessary evil, some little quirk not worth worrying about, something that emerges from the model itself, and not the reality that model is based upon?

It seems obvious that there cannot be knowledge without symbols to represent that knowledge; thus all knowledge must be presented as some kind of metaphor. What escapes our feeble minds all too often is that all symbols for representing information necessarily alter (or distort) that information. To further the simile, it is impossible to roll out the Earth? s curved surface onto a flat map without warping it somehow.

This is the only way we can manage information; all that we know is the result of a laborious process of collection, collation and simplification. Paradoxically, it is this very process that allows us to understand the world that surrounds us, to impose a semblance of order upon all those random nervous impulses delivered to our cortex. Maps, it seems, are truly ubiquitous. The danger, however, is that we let ourselves be led astray by our imperfect understanding of the world, that we seek Truth in the metaphor and not where it truly lies, in Reality.

Is it not possible that at least some of our purported knowledge of the world amounts to nothing but mere features of the model used to describe reality? This is the very essence of correspondence: if our model diverges from reality (or, more pragmatically, if it diverges significantly from reality), then it? s out, it is nothing but a curious collection of ideas. This ruthless housekeeping is essential if our maps are to be as accurate as possible, it is vital that we discard any inaccurate view of the world as soon as it fails to agree with what we see. Otherwise we risk confusing reality and our models of it. Of course, even if the model works, this tells us nothing about the actual principles that make the model tick, the clockwork inside.

As long as it works, one can hear the pragmatists scream, does it even matter? We may well know the map like the back of our hand, but of the world we know nothing.


Free research essays on topics related to: map, hasn t, black holes, physics, metaphor

Research essay sample on Black Holes Hasn T

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com