Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Terminally Ill Patients Legalize Euthanasia - 625 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Voluntary euthanasia is a very contentious issue in todays society. This is where a terminally ill patients life is ended at their request. The law allows doctors to withdraw treatment or administer high doses of pain-relieving drugs even though they expect this will result in death. However, euthanasia is still considered a serious crime. Advocates of euthanasia argue that it prevents terminally-ill patients from pointlessly suffering and that it lets them die with dignity. For instance, Ken explains to the judge that he doesnt want to continue living such a degrading life where he cant even urinate for himself and has to be rolled over by nurses so he does not rot away from bedsores.

It is also argued that we have no right to prevent people doing anything that does not harm others in a free society. Therefore, we should legalize euthanasia. Ken is a good example of this. He is prevented from dying despite the fact he has made a calm rational decision to die as Dr Scott explains it at the end of Act One.

The final argument is that since the law already allows the removal of treatment or the administration of high doses of painkillers, hastening the patients termination, euthanasia should be legalized to make the law consistent. The most emphatic opponent of euthanasia is the Catholic Church. Its beliefs on this issue are based on the Doctrine of the Sanctity of Human Life. This doctrine states that it is utterly wrong to destroy human life.

Based on this premise the main arguments for euthanasia can be debated: The advantages of avoiding suffering and preserving dignity are negated by the evil of taking a humans life. The law is obliged to ban acts that are grossly immoral, and therefore we should not allow euthanasia. By removing treatment or administering high doses of pain-killers the doctor does not actually do anything that is immoral. There are also many practical problems with legislation. It is possible that euthanasia could be misused by unscrupulous people who want the patients legacy, or by hospitals trying to save money.

Then there are also problems with creating legislation. For example, who decides if a patient is mentally ill and unable to make a rational decision about euthanasia? In the play Ken has to be examined by a psychologist named Dr Barr who decides he is sane and suffering from reactive depression and that he is reacting in a perfectly rational way to his situation. However, Dr Barr could of easily made a mistake and diagnosed Ken with a mental illness, and Ken could of been forced to live the rest of his life with the high spot of his day being a new catheter or an enema. Opponents also argue that cures may be found for patients such as Ken. However, the fact is that most patients can not bear to wait for a cure when they live such debased lives, and they believe their life to be a hopeless cause.

For instance, Ken says I am almost completely paralysed and I will always be that way. , when he talks to Mr Hill. To summarise, the arguments for and against euthanasia are fairly clear if we are objective. However, I am subjective and on the basis that that a large majority of terminations are comfortably decided by our present system there is no need to legalize euthanasia. To do this will open the right to a good death to the vagaries of theologians, legislators, medical practitioners, etc. who may be divorced from the realities of lying in a bed of pain, excreta and debasement!

Bibliography: Bibliography Clark, Brian; Whose Life Is It Anyway? , published by Samuel French. Taylor, Barry; Euthanasia-is it a good death?


Free research essays on topics related to: human life, good death, high doses, terminally ill patients, legalize euthanasia

Research essay sample on Terminally Ill Patients Legalize Euthanasia

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com