NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
A Review Of Oliver Stone s JFK When Oliver Stone created JFK in 1991 he produced a historical drama that works as a mystery and a thriller. Not only did he create a movie that crossed multiple genres he did well. How does a movie that runs over three hours long find success? It realizes that the world is filled with conspiracy junkies and tapes into what may be, at least in Stone s opinion, one of the largest conspiracies in the history of mankind. Whether Stone s opinion is the true history of what occurred or not, his power of his chosen medium is strong enough to sway me. JFK is a film that blurs the reality of history with fictional dramatizations creating an image of what might have been.
Following the texts written by real life district attorney Jim Garrison Oliver Stone weaves a tale linking all levels of government to the murder of John F. Kennedy. The movie s plot revolves around Garrison s (Kevin Costner) attempt to charge Claw Shaw (Tommy Lee Jones) with the murder of the president. With Joe Pesci, Walter Matthau, Kevin Bacon, Sissy Spacek, Gary Older, Jack Lemmon, and many other well known, successful, actors Oliver Stone s has created an ensemble cast that pushes the movie to greatness.
It is the actors who, due to their skill in their profession, who blur reality from fiction. Their performances are so good we forget that we are watching actors that we have seen as someone else. We believe that they may be the person who saw the bullet fly out of the bushes or saw two men running away. There are for components that make this extremely long film (3 Hrs +) not only viewable, but also unforgettable. One, the acting is superb (If more detail is needed refer to previous paragraph). Two, the editing is fluent and effective.
Stone creates his own perception of the events by cutting in between his footage and actual footage seamlessly. Likewise, suspense is created through his editing that the best horror directors wish they could create. Three, the music is selected in hope of emphasizing what the action is trying to say. This links sound and video in a coherent way not usually achieved by directors. Four, the cinematography in the film captures not only the style of the time, but also the emotion in the scene. Yet there is more to JFK.
Stone has a valid excuse for the length of his film. It is detailed. No corners were cut in the research and development of this story. Each minute is used effectively to further the development, the style and the motion of the film.
Therefore, instead of complaining of the length we should appreciate the each minute of it. For JFK is one of the monumental films of the 90 s. If anything it certainly changed the way docu-dramas were viewed and made. Great film, watch it if you can.
Free research essays on topics related to: length, oliver, actors, jfk, oliver stone
Research essay sample on Oliver Stone Stone Opinion Film
