NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Modern Human Cloning: BAD Human Cloning Modern science has gone beyond the boundaries of ethics and Catholicism to the point where they are trying to take over the role of God and create a human life without yield. Anyone who thinks that they can take the role of God and create another life has no respect for the morals and ethics this country was born on. Technology should not have to prove its power by being the first to create a human life for fun. By going through with this procedure, scientists are raising dangers as well as severe consequences. No one knows what this semi-human may bring to out society.
Human cloning is not something that should be employed in our culture today or any other day. This method is wrong and anyone that believes in Catholicism or even God for that matter would agree. The American people, and the world, are not ready and never will be for this kind of technology. This method will raise so much controversy over the morals that arise, that we will have no other choice but to abort this method or reproduction. Human cloning is a procedure in where a cell is taken from one person and combined with an egg from a donor woman.
Once they are both taken, they are combined, fertilized, and then placed back into the uterus for incubation. By taking this cell from another person, you are giving the child-to-be an exact replica of the subjects DNA. Everyone knows that each persons DNA is different. This procedure would totally redefine everything technology has worked on for the past one hundred years.
Not only is this against a Catholics moral by taking the egg out of a woman and fertilizing it in a petri dish, it against the ethics of many people throughout the world because you are making a copy of a person. Each person has the right to be unique. If this method is made possible, not only can there be duplicates of people running around, but if put into the wrong hands, someone could be able to clone someone just by taking a glass that person has drank out of. The cloning of animals is only three years old and is only successful one time out of twenty.
Yet, the world is in a mad rush to duplicate the first human being. Is the world prepared to kill human fetuses for the mere pleasure of being the first to create a human life? Someone needs to put a stop to this ludicrous research before it even begins. Cloning a human life should be banned throughout the world because it endangers the child-to-bes individuality. Who are his or her parents supposed to be? Should the scientists that developed the fetus be held responsible for this child?
There are many questions people need to ask themselves before consenting to this particular form of child reproduction. Mr. Leon Cass M. D. , PhD and a Professor at the University of Chicago went before the Committee on Energy and Commerce to propose a bill banning human cloning. In his testimony Mr.
Cass states that he believes human cloning is unethical both in itself and in what is surely leads to (Cass, p. 5). Cass also states that he believes that it constitutes an unethical experimentation on the child-to-be for it exposes him or her to the risk of abnormalities. No one can be sure of what kind of abnormalities can take place in the cloning of a child. If the experiment does not go exactly accordingly, many things can occur. Physical appearance can be botched; internal problems may occur if not right away, possible later on in the childs life. Cass also states that Permitting human cloning means saying yes to the dangerous principle that we are entitled to determine and design the genetic make-up for our children (Cass, p. 2).
Parents should not be able to make such a decision as what their child will look like, or what kind of attributes it may posses. This decision should be left up to one person, and one person only, GOD! If parents are given this type of option, what does that say for a persons individuality? You may be causing that child psychological problems later on its life. A ban on human cloning sounds like a good idea, but what kind of problems or obstacles must one overcome to get this bill to become a law? If you were to ban human cloning, at what stage would cloning become illegal?
There are births being done today that require eggs to be taken out of the female uterus and fertilized, and then place back into the uterus. This stage also takes place in the process of human cloning, only the egg is combined with a cell from another human being. If a ban is proposed on human cloning it should be done before experimentation even begins. The ban should state that no egg shall be taken out of the uterus and combined with a cell from another person. Also, this ban should take affect as soon as possible. There are already plans being made all over the world for producing a human clone.
All experimentation, research, and tests should come to a halt at once. If human cloning is eventually banned, there is not need for these experiments, etc. What kind of dangers are in store in the near future if human cloning does begin? What if this procedure falls into the wrong hands? Agreed, this does sound a little far-fetched, but it is always a possibility. Take the present day conflict with Afghanistan.
What if Afghanistan were to become the first to develop human cloning, and were able to develop a kind of super-human? What will result of this? Could this develop into a new type of biological warfare? Given, Afghanistan does not have the technology or the equipment to do such a thing, it is something to keep in mind.
Other dangers that are more believable could include, sudden abortions, stillbirths, and gross birth defects. These things are already unexplainable and initially undetectable problems of today. Who says that utilizing someone elses used DNA to make a new organism is healthy? Everyones DNA becomes damaged, as they grow older. When a fetus is developing, it is expecting new strands of DNA that are not damaged, and that carry no diseases. There is just not enough knowledge about cloning to date to begin to clone humans.
What will these human clones be used for anyway? They certainly cannot replace someone that may be deceased. Just by replicating a persons genes does not replicate the environment and the development experiences that makes a person who that are. If you do clone a human, it doesnt mean that they are going to make the same life choices that the deceased may have. Though the clone will look like the deceased person, it may not have the same personality, or the memories that person may have possessed. Some also believe that by developing clones we will finally be able to solve our organ shortage.
Are we really that barbaric to where we will develop and grow fetuses for the use of it organs? What will become of a child once it is used for its heart? Will it just be thrown into the dumpster like garbage? Hopefully people will detest such ideas, and forget this form of receiving new organ downers. Another belief is that clones will bring a new way for infertile couples to have children. There are already numerous methods for these people to conceive or receive a baby.
There is adoption, artificial insemination, and in-vitro fertilization. All these methods are know to be safe, and definitely not unethical. (I will continue this paper with more beliefs as well as opinions by doctors and the public, long term affects from this method, and eventually a conclusion. )
Free research essays on topics related to: wrong hands, role of god, one person, human cloning, human life
Research essay sample on Role Of God Human Cloning
