NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
The fates of young women Jocasta's destiny is really cruel in play Oedipus. Jocasta is an integral part of the play, Oedipus the King, by Sophocles. Her actions and thoughts are important to the reader as well as the characters within the play. In this passage there are several themes and significant items that she is addressing. Jocasta is trying to help relieve Oedipus of his fears that come from the oracles. Jocasta states at the beginning of her speech to Oedipus (977 - 984), that since chance is against him there is no need to worry; he can not know what will occur in the future. (Begley 156) Jocasta, on the other hand, does not follow her own advice, and decides to kill herself instead of living with the guilt of sleeping with Oedipus.
She continues to say that because of fate man should live life without thinking of the consequences of his actions. It seems as though Jocasta advocates a world without morals. It is almost as though Jocasta does not see anything wrong with a man sleeping with his mother. Jocasta is being hypocritical when she says that person should not think about his actions because he can not avoid taking them [ 971 ]. According to this logic, her discussion to marry Oedipus, even after the oracle stated that she will marry her son who will kill her husband, was inevitable. When she finally becomes aware that Oedipus, her husband, is also her son she is horrified [ 1060 - 1061 ].
If she really believed that a person should live life unthinkingly, " then she would have been able to continue on with her life, and not to have been so distraught by the news. However, she goes so far as to kill herself [ 1246 - 1252 ]. While Jocastas speech point to her hypocrisy, it also points to a world without morals - a world where man should do whatever he wants and does not have to worry about his actions. Best to live lightly, as one can, unthinkingly, " Jocasta says, painting a portrait of a society without morals. One might say that Sophocles here argues that fate is responsible for everything and that man can do nothing to avoid it. In this play we realize that man is punished for acts that may be considered immoral.
The fate of a person still rests on the actions that he commits. If Oedipus had not killed Laius, then the oracles decree would never have come to pass. Lined throughout the play are examples of people suffering for the actions that they committed that were immoral: the people of Thebes suffer from a plague because they have not avenged the murder of their Laius; Oedipus suffers for killing his father, and sleeping with his mother. In Oedipus case he punishes himself by blinding himself.
He does this because he knows that the acts that he committed are so horrible. He is unable to live with himself, seeing the results of his actions, Immune and Antigone. Oedipus blinds himself, so that he would not have to see the products of his terrible deed, his daughters [ 1272 - 1276 ]. Oedipus might be physically blind only at the end of the play, but from the beginning of the play he is unable to see what his future holds for him. Jocasta infers in her speech that Oedipus, just like most other men, is blind when it comes to his future. (Begley 114) Jocasta states that because man does not determine his own future; he can not control the events that will affect his future. He is subject to what fate determines for him.
This is evident in the fact that even though Oedipus knew from the oracle that he would kill his father and marry his mother. He was still unable to predict that Polybus was not his father, and that Laius was. Oedipus thought he knew exactly how to escape the oracle, but in the end he lost. The people who he thought were his parents were not really his parents, and the man that he killed was really a king, and his father. Nothing is clear for him at this moment. Towards the end of the play everything does become apparent to him, but he can only see what had occurred in the past, and not the future.
It is ironic that the only person within the play that was able to see the future was a blind man. Oedipus even mocked Teiresias that he is blind. In the end we see Oedipus as the blind man: in both aspects, that he can not see physically, and that he was unable to see his future [ 370 - 372 ]. One of Oedipus greatest mistakes were that he was unable to see that he is sleeping with his own mother. Jocasta, in this passage, is not so against a man sleeping with his own mother. She states, man has slept with his mother many times before in many other circumstances, but only the man who does not give it much thought will continue to live peacefully.
It seems that she is telling Oedipus to be inhuman. She says that Oedipus should not fear sleeping with his own mother. Oedipus, rightly so, is very upset at this point it the play, because he is filled with fear when he thinks of committing such a vile act [ 984 - 986 ]. It is unnatural for a person to sleep with his mother, yet Jocasta insists that it is fine. Jocasta's speech is one of great importance it has several ideas that Sophocles is trying to stress throughout this play. She states that man can not get away from his fate.
She also offers several pieces of advice to Oedipus which seem to go against what she feels or does. Overall this passage is important for the reader to understand the themes, characters, and their positions within the play. In Moliere's The flying Doctor, the young women depicted in the play also have a terrible fate. The character of Sganarelle first appears in The Flying Doctor; his namesake recurs in no fewer than six other plays by Moliere, though in different guises: as a servant, a fiance, a husband and a father. In introducing a wily serving man into his play, Moliere was adapting a personage from commedia dell? arte and also setting a pattern for himself and later authors.
Sganarelle illustrates the dichotomy in Moliere's writing; he seems like a crudely drawn personality at first; later he proves to have nearly in exhaustive resources of sophistication as he works himself into a sweat, apparently for the sake of his master, but actually because he delights in exercising his ingenuity. When he first appears, the spectator wonders whether this simpleton can possibly impersonate a doctor. But surprise! He puts on a corpse-side manner more convincingly than a genuine doctor could.
Moliere's classic 17 th century comedy views the world through the eyes of its characters and reveals the pretense and posturing amongst the so-called witty literati of the 17 th century French court. It shows us two extremes between the real and the ideal. On the one hand, we have Alceste, disgusted with the hypocrisy of the world, who has declared that there is no good in man, and who has vowed never to lie about the virtues of others. He is, of course, the misanthrope of the title. (Weizner 160) This attitude gets him into a considerable amount of trouble, including a law suit which he loses because he refuses to flatter the judge and the equity of Oronte, whose poetry he cannot bring himself to praise. His big problem is that he is in love with the flirtatious and shallow Celimene (as is his rival Oronte), and continues to be so despite his knowledge of all her faults, ones which he devices in others.
On the other hand, we have his friend Philinte, (Kevin) who has the instincts of a courtier, always ready to find a word in praise of others. Moliere manages to make him sufficiently sympathetic that the audience will not blame or despise him for this in the way that it will some of the other characters. Nevertheless, the main interest for both Moliere and for us is the character of Alceste, which is only natural given that there are more possibilities for comedy in a character who is different from everyone else around him (and from the audience too - a major part of the point of the play), and who refuses to moderate his principles in any way whatsoever. The Flying Doctor is a tour de force for a comedian; except for one interlude when the lawyer takes over, he is in command of the stage for almost the entire play, and the part makes heavy demands on his verbal and physical agility, short though the text may be. Some critics have frowned on the urine scene, finding it below Moliere's usual taste. The fates of young women depicted in the play are something that Moliere is critiqued for, since they are too cruel for a comedy.
However, Moliere had his own points and perspectives when creating the story line the way he did, and the fates of those young women could become a lesson for many to learn from. Moliere critiques certain attitudes and values within his contemporary society, and the fates of those young women, however tragic they might seem to a contemporary viewer, are important for his play. (Weizner 163) Words Count: 1, 562. Bibliography: Begley, J. Analyzing Oedipus Rex. New York: Harper Collins, 1999.
Moliere, The Flying Doctor. New York: Harper Collins, 1987. Sophocles. Oedipus Rex. Michigan: Zondervan Publishers, 1991. Weizner, A. 100 famous Plays: Analyses and facts.
London: Pluto Press, 1997.
Free research essays on topics related to: 17 th century, end of the play, york harper collins, oedipus rex, young women
Research essay sample on The Fates Of Young Women
