NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Stanley Kubrick was one of the great filmmakers, died in his bed of a heart attack on Sunday morning, March 7 th 1999. When I first heard the report, I blinked twice in disbelief. It just seemed WAY too soon to bid good-bye to Stanley. Somehow, he was one of those people you get to think will always be there. And its appealing to have known all these years that up there in Hertfordshire, he was working away on some new project or other. SOMEone had been doing something new and special.
After all, creative perfectionists have become nearly an anathema as the centuries increment. So much of what we are asked to read, to hear, to look at, even to eat, seems the result of expedience, a matter of pure commerce. Intelligence, even touches of genius (as he had ample times, ) have become quaint relics of an earlier age. Our loss, more than you may think. I was one of the few artists to have worked more than once with him. The experience and memories are indelibly etched on my brain.
The face-to-face meetings for spotting music to compose for A Clockwork Orange and The Shining couldnt have lasted very much more than a week or two each for me and my then partner and producer, Rachel (it would be unfair to Rachel to characterize her impressions here, and so these are only my observations, although she was present and worked with me throughout the details that follow. ) Since my none-too-portable studio was located in New York, and Kubrick didnt travel, the rest of the collaboration took place via long phone calls and messages, express packages of cassettes, tapes, film and video footage, and written memos and notes. If faxing had been more available, and the Web had existed back then, its certain wed have used these media to communicate in great detail, too! Stanley Kubrick was not an easy man to work for. He was vastly interesting, completely open about all his secrets, and had a dry sense of humor. You were always stimulated working with him. But it was seldom painless.
I would truly have preferred to be another director or friend. Read Arthur C. Clarkes The Lost Worlds of 2001 for another parallax on this observation even if its essentially a congruent conclusion. (Once Stanley told me that aside from A. C. C. I was the most outspoken, candid person he had worked with.
This merely means in my case that I had a big mouth, and sometimes still say too much, perhaps even here. ) One works (damn, I keep using the present tense) worked with him for other good reasons. All of this is completely in keeping with a demanding, even obsessive person of great depth who is trying to find the optimum answer for the smallest decision, however much time and effort it takes. Im rather tarred by the same brush in many ways, close ( = brave) friends inform me; -), and understand, even empathize with such an attitude, including the times when it bites back. Its just that my new media music medium is more tractable to watch-making godzinthuh details, than the large-scale collaborative and social inter activities of making feature films. Whos to complain if I go for a fifty-seventh retake except my lazy side alter-ego (or possibly Heinz? ) Whereas Stanley got tagged early on as overly demanding or inhumane.
Having been the target myself of redo after redo, I empathize with both sides of this coin. You can understand why recent attempts since his death to paint a revisionist (revisionary historians right out of Orwell feh! ) image of Kubrick as some kind of warm and fuzzy fond old uncle are both ignorant and bizarre. The world has plenty of avuncular supportive seniors already. Whats in short supply in the world is Stanley Kubrick's: artists who will spare no effort to do work of the highest caliber. Yes, its impractical, and not a role most artists are able to inhabit with comfort, unless you command the respect and financial support system he needed.
It allowed him to wing it, the way most creative projects are intuitively steered, kind of groping forward towards some kind of inevitability. Hed often risk experiments, creative trial and error. When Stanley liked what you were doing he supported you all the way; youd be hard pressed to find a more canny supporter. Many young directors got messages and calls from him if he loved their newest film. (Ill bet Hitchcock, another real master, never did that! ) Kubrick assembled a support system / nest to avoid most usual external needs to compromise. We may all envy him in this. Stanley loved animals, and was often surrounded by assorted purring cats and affable dogs.
He was mostly quiet-spoken and easy to take in person, a bit detached like the cool chess expert he also was, and I seldom heard him angry. That left me to be the more volatile and voluble one in our meetings and conversations. He would meet you and at once gather closer and focus on you, your thoughts, experiences, and collected tidbits of knowledge and expertise. It made one feel rather important, and valuable to the project afoot, you know? But it did not seem to me to be either planned or phony. Since he also held his own methods and secrets as fair game to any impertinent question (my spe-ci-al-i-ty; -), what transpired probably could be best described as a mutual brain-pick.
And why not? A chance to showoff and absorb, play with the language and ideas, and feel intellectually stimulated. Its a style of personal interaction thats quite familiar to me, especially in New York City, which is where he was born and grew up, not so coincidentally Its also said that he was a recluse. Not really. A true recluse does not enjoy meeting new people, having hour-long phone calls with friends and associates, and inviting many of the most able people in a given field to come work with him. That allowed him to study them and their Stanley Kubrick...
Loved life. His ideas, to figure out what makes them tick, in those most agreeable, flattering ways. I had the feeling Stanley enjoyed getting to know people. The reasons he seldom traveled were due more to human foibles: the risks of flying, or even driving much in a car, were unacceptable to him. Its an understandable matter of fear and statistics. With modern communications technology, it gets easier to pull this off each day, without becoming a hermit or misanthrope.
Sad that with all the precautions he took, he did not gain a notably long life, as one might expect as fair trade for so modest a lifestyle. Many others knew him and his wonderful wife (Christiane is a genuinely gifted painter and artist, ) daughters (Vivian's a fine film maker and talented musician, ) and family much deeper than I did. Others worked much longer right there with him, not remote control as we had to. Still others, like his urbane and witty, ultra-sharp Brother-in-law, Jan, were truly close, and knew him when no project was in progress, when he was relaxing, in off mode.
They will have to speak for themselves. We shall miss him not as a mere celebrity (which many news reports and broadcasts did, damn them), but as a gifted artist and creator of some of the best films ever made. They will be watched, studied, and remembered long after the rest of us are gone, too. Pace, Stanley.
Free research essays on topics related to: kubrick, support system, phone calls, stanley, stanley kubrick
Research essay sample on Stanley Kubrick Phone Calls
