Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Making Drugs Legal Legalization Of Drugs - 2,538 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Drugs Should Not be Legalized The question of whether to legalize drugs or not is A Very controversial and important issue. Drugs affect so many areas of society. Several groups have formed and spoken out regarding their position. After learning about the issues regarding both sides of the argument, I would choose to support those who oppose legalization of any drugs. Drugs simply create problems which affects society in several ways. The governments have made several efforts to control drugs and their users, however, to most the problem appears too out of hand.

Society s answer to the problem is to trick the drug user by giving him what he wants. People believe that making drugs legal will take away the temptation to use them. This idea is wrong and far from logical. If drugs are legalized then they will be more accessible to the young, addicted, and ignorant. As a result the ready availability of addicting drugs, and as a result of their heavy use for medical problems, many individuals became addicted to the narcotics contained in these potent medicines. The only resulting effect will be a negative one.

There are no positive aspects of putting drugs on the streets with a label reading legal. There are plenty of people in society that find enough trouble on their own without the help of their country. Legalizing drugs would have a devastating result that would affect society badly. People need to understand that 70 % of drug users are employed, and that the school bus driver who drives your children to school could smoke marijuana or that a doctor that is going to make a surgeon had consume it before doing it. There is an idea that the drug user is a low class unemployed person. This is false.

The drug user is often a worker with a family and a future. They are not all dirty with missing teeth and poor grammar. The common un conception of the consumers are dangerous to those members of society trying to rid the world of the problem. One of the greatest concerns of drugs is their contribution to the crime rate. Crime will always be a problem as long as drugs exist and are abused. Crime too often is the result of a drug problem.

The crime rate would probably lower if drugs were illegal because the drug abusers wouldn t need to steal to pay for their drugs. Legalizing drugs would just add to an already rising problem. This should be reason enough to make all drugs illegal. Legalizing drugs will just feed the problem that teenagers and young adults face daily. Making drugs legal makes them more conscience accessible and easier to them. The problems that society already faces with the unemployed, homeless, criminals, and high school thrown out rate will simply increase.

What society would want such problems to increase. The thought of how seriously this could impact our entire nation is both ridiculous and terrifying. I strongly believe that there are a great deal of people who have not tried drugs out of fear of getting caught. If this fear were taken from them, they would probably become drug addicts. I believe that our country should uphold a few basic standards, and keep drugs and the problems they create out of our society. Legalization of any drugs is an act of stupidity and ignorance.

DRUG LEGALIZATION Every time I read a report on a newspaper or hear news on television about drug problems in our society, I always question about the law processors have to confront with drugs. Drugs are the fathers of all descending law violations such as raising market prices, black market, and crime. People still discuss the legalization of drugs. Some can argue that we should legalize drugs in order to govern the consumption rather than spend millions of dollars and face problems in controlling drugs if we do not legalize it.

However, I think there are many unacceptable results of legalization of drugs that most supporters avoid; those are the increase of drug users, the inhumanity aspect, and the provoking of crime. In It Isn t Working, William F. Buckley Jr. insists that legalization of drugs will bring an end to drug-related crime and illegal profits (Buckley 422). He mentions that the law processors seem to be unable to forbid the importation of dope, heroin, or marijuana. The addicts still have crack to inject.

If the governments legalize drugs, besides the financial benefit earned from trading drugs, they can also save the money from spending in preventing drugs processes such as breeding 50 million drug-trained dogs to sniff everyone getting off a boat or an airplane (Buckley 423). In contrast, legalization of drugs could raise the amount of addicts because it becomes easier for them to obtain this poisonous substance. If drugs are not legalized, the addicts have to overpass many barriers of laws to get the marijuana or sneak in the black market to purchase crack; these partly isolate them from drug attraction. Recently, a San Jose resident has received a business license to open a club to sell marijuana to people suffering from AIDS, cancer, and other ailments. (Buckley 468) The buyers must show their doctor s prescriptions. How about the addicts?

To them, getting a prescription is un troublesome; they could make an imitation one. Furthermore, the sellers always desire the amount of consumers to increase in order to make a profit, and the addicts are the essential source to consume their customers can easily purchase drugs. Otherwise, these will come back to the black market. The other disadvantage of legalization of drugs is inhumanity. The harms of using drug are so clear that we can not deny or ignore it. You can see that nowadays people are making affords to eliminate the drugs by their special strategies between country and country.

Even they offer the worst punishment for people who buy and sell drugs: death. Furthermore, buying and selling drugs are one of national bans. Those things are enough to make you wonder about their effects, harms, and consequences. In addition, Preventing Drug Problems, by Taha Baasher, said that The drug scene is infested with a wide range of socio-economic problems including criminality and violence, as well as posing serious health hazards. Concern is growing in an ever increase number of countries. Essentially, in order to develop effective preventive measures, it is important to identify the underlying motivation for using a drug. (Baasher 6) Drugs cause more damages to the mind or body than alcohol or tobacco many times.

Violent crimes from drugs might rise up more after the end of prohibition instead of decreasing. As everyone knows, dope addicts, under the excited affect of drugs, will do any thing to get the next dose of cocaine. They will certainly never give up to commit violent crimes. I have heard that people feel extremely happy, rapturous, and satisfied after they use drugs. They feel as if they are in heaven.

Thereafter, they are often addicted and hardly get risk of it. It is like they put their heads in the rope; the more they free themselves, the more they tie. Moreover, how can the addict ignore a vivid drug attraction when it always exists in front of them; most of them will not hesitate to burn their money for drugs. Gradually, they often forget their responsibility to make the money for their family and the responsibility as a family s member. Killing each individual, drugs gradually kill a generation and a society. In another article, Violence, Crime, and Drugs, the Libertarian Party states that violent crimes, in general, increase more and more in the United States society, so the government has had to spend a great deal of resources to solve these problems.

However, we waste our resources to get no result at all because most of these resources are revered for a battle we never win the war on drug. Drugs are put in an illegal situation; in this condition, drug prices have been pushed up and up to lead to a great attraction for trading. That makes not only drug pushers but dope addicts also commit many more crimes to protect their great profit from drugs should be re legalized in the United States to eliminate the enormous profit of drug trade. The main causes of drug-related violent crimes, reduce our crime problem, and devote our resources to fighting other crimes we can win instead of the war on drug. What the Libertarian Party says about the possibility of elimination of drug-related crimes and reducing crime problems is really a new and interesting thing. However, I still disagree with their idea.

I think that the end of drug prohibition will lead to some other problems with much more serious results. When drugs are legal and trades of it are easy, I am sure that the number of dope addicts will increase enormously year by year. Everyone knows, cocaine is known as highly dangerous and very addictive drug. If you are already tried it several times, you will quickly become addicted to cocaine and then hardly give it up.

Following the increasing of dope addicts, drug- related death race would certainly go up. In brief, I disagree with them and think that drugs should not be re legalized forever. The last bad aspect of legalization of drugs is that it provokes crime. Whenever a person becomes an addict, people seldom dare to hire him. He can not find a job; how can he have money to buy drugs?

All the money he has is the gift from his relative or from other family s member. If nobody gives money to him, the only way to obtain the money may be to rob. When I was in Vietnam, I observed my cousin frightening my aunt in order to give him all her jewelry so that he could sell them and get money to satisfy his addiction crack. Worse, an addict can become a desperate killer if he is not satisfied. In conclusion, it must be reiterated that drug problems are among the most damaging menaces of modern life. Their effective prevention calls for the development of all-out efforts, involving clear long-term policies in close harmony with all the social sectors concerned and with active community participation.

Legalization of drugs is impossible because it can raise the numbers of the addicts, be inhumanity, and provoke crime. Therefore, we should limit possible addictions by control selling marijuana, cocaine, or any other kind of illegal drugs. Work Cited: It Isn t Working. by Buckley Jr. William F. Subject and Strategy. 7 th Ed.

Eds. Paul Eschholz and Alfred Rose. New York: St. Martin s, 1996.

Preventing Drug Problems. By Taha Baasher, Volume 4 -article # 16 from WORLD HEALTH- Aug. /Sept. 1995, pp. 6 - 9 Violence, Crime, and Drugs. Adopted by The Libertarian National Committee, 23 August 1992 Drug Legalization Since the prohibition of marijuana in 1965 there has been sparked a new heated controversy over the legalization and / or decriminalization of this and other banned substances. Many politicians and lawmakers as well as philosophers, doctors, students, etc. have weighed the facts and opinions and have come to a decision on which side of the fence to sit on. The arguments either for or against the legalization of drugs seem to stem from two main focuses of thought.

These two main ideas are that of consequential ism and deontology. Consequentialism is defined as the position that an action is right if it has good consequences and wrong if it has bad consequences (Class Notes). On the other side, is deontology, the position that believes that actions are right or wrong in themselves, regardless of their consequence (Class Notes). An easy way to simplify these definitions is to think about how these two thoughts would apply to murder. A de ontologist would believe that murder is wrong simply because it is the taking of another s life, that the intrinsic value of murder is bad so thus murder is bad. A consequential ist on the other hand would look deeper at the motive and consequence of the murder, then form an opinion from there.

Looking past the intrinsic value of it, what if the one person that was murdered, was killed because he had a bomb that was going to kill 300 people? If believing in this channel of thought, one might conclude that this one sacrifice of life saved 300 others, thus the overall outcome is good, so the action was right. Many classical as well as contemporary philosophers maintain opinions and ideals that can be classified as either consequential ist or de ontological. Classical philosophers such as John Stuart Mill and John Milton, along with more modern writers like Milton Friedman and Ethan A. Nadelmann are all examples of consequential ist thinkers. On the de ontological side of the coin reside such well-known purveyors of classical thought as Aristotle and Edmund Burke, along with contemporaries like William J.

Bennett and James Q. Wilson. The two main ideas of thought held by the two divisions of these gentlemen have a great deal to do with their positions on the legalization of drugs. It is important to keep in mind that while the opinions of Friedman or Bennett, for example, are known because of their writings and expression of these opinions, we are only assuming at this point what an older philosopher, like Aristotle for example, would think about the controversy. The de ontologist way of thought would conclude that the use of illegal substances is a bad thing and should be banned from usage by authority. Aristotle for example believed that the job of government was to make people virtuous and good.

In keeping with this idea, the intrinsic value of substance use and abuse is bad, and in keeping with the idea that it is a bad thing, it would be mistakenly backwards for a government in a position of authority to make it legal, thus implying it good to use these substances. A consequential ist, on the other hand, would not shun the drug use itself as bad, rather look past the use of the drug and place their opinion on the outcome of the usage of the drug. The consequential ist way of thought, coupled with Mill s idea of the Harm Principle makes for a deeper look into the right or wrong of drug use. Loosely paraphrased, the Harm Principle can be summarized as the rights of an individual extend as far as his neighbors face. Meaning that personal rights are only endowed upon and justly held by the bearer of these rights so as long that they do not harm nor infringe upon others rights (Mill). In keeping with this, a consequential ist would conclude that the use of drugs and the legalization to further the use of these drugs are not a bad things so as the consequences were not ill and no one but the user was possibly harmed.

It can be seen with these examples and with further in depth study of philosophy there exist many different sides to controversial topics.


Free research essays on topics related to: violent crimes, legalizing drugs, making drugs legal, legalization of drugs, consequential ist

Research essay sample on Making Drugs Legal Legalization Of Drugs

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com