NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Destruction of 1 st Amendment Rights In Our Schools In 1787 our forefathers ratified the constitution of the United States of America, which contains the most important document than American citizen, the Bill of Rights. The first amendment of the Bill of Rights states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the establishment thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech; or of the press; or the right ofthe people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. these freedoms (commonly called the freedom of expression) are ofthe most important rights in a truly democratic society. Without them there would be no new ideas; we would all conform under totalitarian rule for fear of punishment. However, when I, a common student at West Rowan High School try to express my feelings on testate of the Bill of Rights in schools today by making a computer presentation in multimedia class, my work is declared bad and my teacher and assistant principal do one of the most un-American things imaginable: they censored it.
I had to re-make the presentation and lighten the harsh tone, and also erase the anarchy symbol from it. The teacher said that she was worried about me for reasons such as my feelings on the freedom of religion were almost satanic, because I said teachers should not be able to publicly practice religion in schools because it will encourage students to become a part of that religion. The presentation was neither slanderous nor obscene, but it did criticize teachers and administrators calling them fascist dictators. At first I was angry at the school because I could wear clothing thats obscene or contained liquor advertisements, now they have completely taken away my freedom of speech. This of course proved my argument that teachers and administrators are totalitarians. Alone journalist put it, If Freedom of expression becomes merely an empty slogan in the minds of enough children, it will be dead by theme we are adults.
I soon began reading more and more about the freedom of speech in schools and every time a subject as such came upton Supreme Court ruled in favor of the student declaring the action unconstitutional under the first amendment. As I was reading NatHentoffs book The First Freedom I came across a story in which a student wrote a newspaper article criticizing the school administration, soon after he ran for student government and was taken off the ballot for his critique. Unfortunately he did not fight it in court. The principal sharply taught the student, The constitution of this school takes precedence over the United States Constitution. The freedom of expression in school is marred by society but not completely dissolved by the administration. The 1969 supreme court ruling Tinker v.
Des Moins Community Schools defined a students freedom of speech best. John and MaryBeth Tinker wore black armbands to school as a protest of the Vietnam war. It was a silent protest; the Tinkers never caused one problem, although some students did make threats at them. The schools administrators made them take them off.
Their case made italy the way to the US Supreme Court, where it won a 7 - 2 ruling. (Pascoe, 96) Justice Abe Fortas gave an excellent interpretation o students freedom of speech when he said: It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their rights at the schoolhouse gate In our system, state-operated schools may not be the enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school as well as out of school are persons under our constitution. Students may not be regarded as closed circuit recipients of only that which the State wishes to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved.
In essence Fortas stated that a student could say whatever they wanted, no matter what it was. However, The Court acknowledged that there would be times when expression should be limited; such as if a student disrupted classwork, created substantial disorder, or infringed on the rights of others. The fact that the administration thought it might cause a disturbance was not enough. The court said: Any departure from absolute regimentation may cause trouble.
Any variation from the majority's opinion may inspire fear. Any word spoken, in class in the lunchroom, or on the campus may start an argument or cause a disturbance. But our Constitution says we must take this risk. (Pascoe, 98) Tinker s opinion stood as a rule until 1983 when Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier changed academic history again. Students in Hazelwood wrote articles on teen pregnancy and divorce in their student newspaper The Spectrum, and their principal deleted them because they were inappropriate. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school because they said the school shouldnt be required to endorse ideas it considered unsuitable.
This decision gave administrators the right to censor newspapers, plays and many other activities. Everything the students printed was fact and they should be able to say whatever they want as long as it isnt libelous. Later in 1986, Bethel School District v. Matthew Fraser further defined the extent of a students rights. Fraser made a speech nominating a friend for student-government and used a few lightly disguised sexual innuendoes. He was subsequently suspended for it.
The Court upheld his speech was obscene because of the strong sexual metaphor that follows: I know a man who is firm. He is firm in his pants he is firm in his shirt, his character is firm but most all his belief in you, the students of Bethel, is firm. Jeff Kuhlman is a man who takes his point and pounds it in. If necessary he will take an issue and nail it to the wall. He doesnt attack things in spurts- he drives hard, pushing and pushing until finally- he succeeds. Jeff is a man who will go to the very end- even the climax for each and every one of you.
So vote for Jeff for A. S. B. vice-president- hell never come between you and the best our high school can be.
This decision further defined a students freedom of speech by stating that a student may not say anything obscene. The first amendment is the most important one because, without it there would be no new ideas. It is a shame our countrys students must live under the dictatorship commonly called the School Board. It is thought that freedom of speech would cause anarchy, but in most instances it is perfectly acceptable. Our government needs to revise and outline a students rights to avoid confusion, and give pupils the rights they deserve.
Free research essays on topics related to: freedom of speech, bill of rights, supreme court ruled, freedom of expression, commonly called
Research essay sample on Supreme Court Ruled Freedom Of Speech
