NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... ng. This issue is to the point where President Bill Clinton banned human cloning. As mentioned in Silberner's article, President Clinton said on this: "we must ratify the ethical consensus of the scientific and religious communities, and ban the cloning of human being" (2). While government is trying to draw the line, single individuals keep focusing their efforts in clone human beings. For example, "Seed is a physicist by education who developed a no-longer-used technique for human embryo transfer" (Silberner 1).
His statements at a conference show his interest on human cloning: "we are going to have almost as much knowledge and almost as much power as God, " (Silberner 2). He seems to be an individual who can really hurt mankind by his desire for power. He also claimed that he has the financial resources and people to start experimenting. A lot of people think that human cloning will be difficult to stop because not all the countries in the world are taking the same position as the United States. Silver claims in Harris's article that "there's nothing that we as a society can do to stop it" (Harris 6). The question really is why do we need to do it? .
Larry Disney MD author of several books on consciousness believes that "just because something can be done, it doesn't necessarily follow that it should be done" (Harris 6). There are really different alternatives or possible solutions to the problems cloning claims it can solved. For instance, one of the biggest concerns of people in favor of cloning is the fact that cloning can help infertile couples. There are already systems such us in-vitro fertilization which are working just fine. David Magnus states in Harris article that "we over valorize genes" (5) meaning that people would prefer the cloning option instead of others such as adoption because by the first one the child would have the parent's genes. He also believe that "maybe we need to counsel people so the can seriously consider other options, like adoption" (5).
It seems difficult to understand how people would go through cloning and its possible bad repercussions to have a baby when there are millions of children in the streets of undeveloped countries and even the United States. Furthermore, it has not been enough research to demonstrate human cloning is safe. For instance, "it took 277 tries to produce Dolly, and Roslin scientists produced many lambs with abnormalities. This is the main reason why science is holding out on cloning humans" (Wilmut, 1997).
The history of cloning is to narrow to start doing it to human beings. Dr. Ian Wilmut, the actual Dolly's creator and absolute authority in this field states that "we think it would be ethically unacceptable and certainly would no want to be involve in that project" (Henahan 2) Besides the debate of cloning being ethical or not, much more animal research should be done before even trying human cloning. For some people might be OK to experiment with animals, but human being is a total different issue.
Scientist cannot experiment with humans like they do with laboratory mousses. It is totally different. On the other hand, this brings up a different issue and this is the bad treatment scientist give to animals. This will keep on going on if scientist want to perfection ate cloning.
Another major problem is the psychology aspect of human cloning which makes matters worst. Psychologists are debating how a cloned individual would feel about the fact that he or she did not born in a natural way and is a twin of somebody that he or she might never met in his or her life. Also, how society would receive this individual. Once in time, men created guns and mass destruction weapons. People found its positive side and applications. We did not stop it and we did not think it was unethical.
Mass destruction and wars followed this creation. I believe we are in front of something similar, something that can hurt mankind if we do not stop it at the right moment. For instance, if scientist get to clone human beings one of the few imaginable things that can happen is that people may kidnap important people just to clone them. Or even create super soldiers or employees among the most horrible things. Also people need to think about the planet's resources. These resources are scare and for certain amount of people.
By cloning people would be changing the planet's natural system and environment. I also believe that cloning violates the rights of both, the new individual and the individual who provide the DNA. Leon Kass, MD professor of social thought at the university of Chicago and author of Toward a More Natural Science states " Identical twins are the result of accident. Clones are the result of design" (Harris 5). For all these reasons I strongly believe that human cloning is unethical and that it should be banned worldwide. Governments need to draw the line and people need to realize the world they live in is regulate by their actions.
Cloning goes against all possible natural things. I think that the risks are much more scary than the benefits humankind can gain from cloning. Let's do not take in our hands something we cannot handle. Bibliography: Works Cited "Cloning." Encyclopedia. 1997 edition. Kolkata, Gina. "With Cloning of a Sheep, Ethical Ground Shifts. " The New York Times. 24 February 1997: publication web site page. Wills, Christopher. "A Sheep in Sheep's Clothing? . " Discover.
January 1998: pp. 22 - 23. Harris, Mark. "To be or not to be?" Vegetarian Times. N. 250, 1998, pp. 64 - 65. Bruce, Dr.
Donald. "Cloning, a Step too Far? (1998, January 5) Society, Religion and Technology. Project, Church of Scotland, [WWW Document] web Hopkins, Patrick. "How Popular Media Represent Cloning As an Ethical Problem. " The Hastings Center Report, v 28, n. 2, 1998, pp. 6 - 8. Husted, Gladys. "Is Cloning Moral?" Nursing and Health Care Perspectives, v. 18, n. 3, 1997, pp. 168. Silberner, Joanne. "Seeding The Cloning Debate. " The Hastings Center Report, v. 28, n. 2, pp. 5. Henahan, Sean. "Access Excellence. " Nature Magazine. February 27, 1997.
Foote, Robert. "Artificial Insemination to Cloning: Tracing 50 Years of Research. " 1 st ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1998. Editorial. "Cooling Down Over Cloning. " P. 151. The Lancet, v. 351, n. 9097, 1998. Ramsey, Paul. "Fabricated Man: The Ethics of Genetic Control. " P. 174. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1995.
Cole-Turner, Roland. "Human Cloning: Religious responses. " 1 st ed. Louisville, KY. Westminster John Knox Press, 1997. Chawla, Anil. "Molecular Cloning of DNA. " [videorecording].
Shrewsbury, MA: Biotech Visions, 1994. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. "Cloning Human Beings: report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. V. 110, 5 p. Rockville, MO: The Commission, 1997.
Free research essays on topics related to: 1 st ed, hastings center report, clone human beings, bioethics advisory commission, national bioethics advisory
Research essay sample on Bioethics Advisory Commission Clone Human Beings
